This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Björn Haase <Bjoern dot M dot Haase at web dot de>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 11:57:58 -0800
Subject: Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <1238991885@web.de> <200501021628.00741.paul@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0501021135040.8214@dberlin.org>

Daniel Berlin wrote:

Bingo.
Heck, i helped write it and i agree.
new-ra has failed, long live a new new-ra

I agree; the new-ra code should be removed before 4.0, or, at least, the option and associated documentation should be removed. It's not useful to users to have this option, as it doesn't work.

Patches to implement either of the above options are pre-approved.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Bj=F6rn=20Haase
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]