gcc archive
date index for January, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 30, 2005

23:32 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works Ben Elliston

20:22 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Björn Haase

19:57 gcc-4.0-20050130 is now available gccadmin

18:46 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding? Ramana Radhakrishnan

17:09 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? sean darcy

17:00 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? sean darcy

16:32 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Andy Hutchinson

16:16 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Björn Haase

07:09 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Eric Botcazou

06:23 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding? Paul Schlie

05:44 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding? Paul Schlie

05:05 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding? Ramana Radhakrishnan

04:54 How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified forsetjump coding? Paul Schlie

03:02 Sorry my website was down! Want something for Free? OK it

01:59 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Gabriel Dos Reis

01:23 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar

01:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Gabriel Dos Reis

01:14 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? Sam Lauber

00:28 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar

00:24 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? James A. Morrison

January 29, 2005

23:34 Re: template_decl's Stefan Strasser

23:20 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? Falk Hueffner

23:08 -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? sean darcy

20:48 Why is there no arg_pointer_needed? Øyvind Harboe

18:28 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Andy Hutchinson

15:55 template_decl's Stefan Strasser

15:45 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Björn Haase

13:44 Status of PR19300? Christian Joensson

02:02 New option? Sam Lauber

01:31 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen

01:15 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Roger Sayle

00:52 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen

January 28, 2005

23:52 gcc-3.4-20050128 is now available gccadmin

23:43 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen

23:39 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL James E Wilson

23:38 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp

22:24 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Øyvind Harboe

21:59 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp

21:54 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Mike Stump

21:50 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles Richard Henderson

21:50 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Roger Sayle

21:43 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp

21:39 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Mike Stump

21:08 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles Richard Henderson

20:59 Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c Andrew MacLeod

20:57 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler

20:44 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen

19:58 linear_search_fdes problem on linux Sanjiv Pandey

19:39 Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type Gabriel Dos Reis

19:15 Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type Devang Patel

19:01 TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type Joseph S. Myers

18:36 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler

18:09 new mirror Mr david deng

17:00 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey

16:23 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp

16:10 Re: Continuing GCCNews rd flowers

16:10 Re: typeof throws away the reference Gabriel Dos Reis

16:04 Re: typeof throws away the reference Gabriel Dos Reis

15:54 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp

15:31 Re: Continuing GCCNews Daniel Berlin

15:16 Re: Continuing GCCNews Giovanni Bajo

15:15 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Remy X.O. Martin

15:07 Re: typeof throws away the reference Andrew Pinski

15:06 Re: Continuing GCCNews Giovanni Bajo

15:04 Re: typeof throws away the reference Giovanni Bajo

14:58 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Remy X.O. Martin

14:48 typeof throws away the reference Jari Petter Sundell

13:54 Failures in gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/copysign1.c execution on i686 Uros Bizjak

13:53 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Jonathan Wilson

13:27 Re: Continuing GCCNews rd flowers

12:18 Re: Building Supergraph (at call graph level) Steven Bosscher

12:04 Building Supergraph (at call graph level) Virender Kashyap

10:52 Re: Continuing GCCNews Giovanni Bajo

08:46 Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help Olivier Hainque

08:44 Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help Olivier Hainque

08:38 Re: [PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Steven Bosscher

08:12 [PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Uros Bizjak

08:05 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Øyvind Harboe

07:07 doubts in adding new instruction aram bharathi

05:54 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Miles Bader

05:50 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Andi Kleen

05:49 Re: Continuing GCCNews rd flowers

05:32 Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger

05:09 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Stan Shebs

04:34 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Dale Johannesen

04:22 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Matt Austern

03:27 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Alexander Strange

03:18 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Stan Shebs

02:27 Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Diego Novillo

00:43 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Richard Henderson

00:42 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Andrew Pinski

00:21 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen

00:04 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Roger Sayle

January 24, 2005

23:52 Re: SSE scalar/float transition tbp

23:49 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Ulrich Weigand

23:43 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Richard Henderson

23:38 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Richard Henderson

23:24 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko

23:20 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko

23:20 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Dale Johannesen

23:10 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Richard Henderson

23:09 Re: SSE scalar/float transition Richard Henderson

23:08 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Mike Frysinger

23:04 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets Richard Henderson

22:56 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko

22:49 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin

22:43 Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Gregory John Casamento

22:32 forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko

22:32 Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation Alan Modra

21:15 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Andreas Schwab

20:36 SSE scalar/float transition tbp

19:48 Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation Ian Lance Taylor

19:11 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Dale Johannesen

18:29 Re: Building gcc Paul Brook

18:19 Building gcc Halldór Ísak Gylfasson

17:47 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin

17:43 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin

17:42 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Joe Buck

17:40 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b Joe Buck

17:33 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Joe Buck

17:29 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin

17:27 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin

17:25 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Joe Buck

17:21 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther

17:07 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin

17:05 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Paolo Carlini

16:59 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin

16:58 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Geert Bosch

16:58 Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin

16:57 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works Nix

16:54 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther

16:50 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Andreas Schwab

16:44 [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insnsets Uros Bizjak

16:35 Re: typeof and bitfields Olly Betts

16:32 Re:Incorrect C++ code or regression? Pierre Chatelier

16:23 Re: Incorrect C++ code or regression? Giovanni Bajo

16:16 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Geert Bosch

16:07 Incorrect C++ code or regression? Grumble

16:05 Re: -mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp

15:43 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b tm_gccmail

14:58 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin

14:46 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin

14:23 Away from email Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

14:23 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute Andrew Pinski

14:20 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute Daniel Jacobowitz

14:17 -mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question Uros Bizjak

14:09 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute Andrew Pinski

14:08 What to do with the transparent_union attribute Steven Bosscher

13:54 Strange compiler error with g++ 3.3 Peter Cech

13:29 bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Jan Beulich

13:03 PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther

12:04 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog

11:56 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog

11:44 Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? Georg Bauhaus

02:55 Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? J.T. Conklin

02:42 Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? Sam Lauber

02:38 Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? Sam Lauber

00:28 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc James A. Morrison

00:04 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Joseph S. Myers

January 23, 2005

23:59 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Andrew Pinski

23:58 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Daniel Berlin

23:56 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Joseph S. Myers

23:44 wikidata dir added to htdocs Daniel Berlin

18:33 gcc-4.0-20050123 is now available gccadmin

18:27 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ? Mark Mitchell

15:34 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ulrich Weigand

15:34 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Robert Dewar

14:05 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Andreas Schwab

14:01 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21] Steven Bosscher

13:34 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired) Virender Kashyap

13:17 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc Tommy Vercetti

13:11 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc James A. Morrison

12:55 can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc Tommy Vercetti

12:42 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Clifford Wolf

04:43 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status Gabriel Dos Reis

04:34 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status Roger Sayle

02:07 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Richard Henderson

00:54 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Remy Martin

00:30 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Andrew Pinski

00:28 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Remy Martin

00:05 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ayal Zaks

January 22, 2005

23:30 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Richard Henderson

23:09 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Robert Dewar

22:43 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Jonathan Wakely

22:43 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ? Daniel Jensen

22:16 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Gabriel Dos Reis

21:58 GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Sam Lauber

21:36 Re: Gcc certification jf

18:51 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? H. J. Lu

18:37 Re: Ada failures due to -largs Eric Botcazou

18:08 Re: Ada failures due to -largs Ulrich Weigand

17:44 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Andrew Pinski

17:41 longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Remy X.O. Martin

17:38 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired) Andrew Pinski

17:36 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired) Daniel Berlin

17:35 Re: Ada failures due to -largs Eric Botcazou

17:35 HELP (change in control flow desired) Virender Kashyap

17:32 Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn Robert Baruch

13:21 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? Marc Espie

09:47 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Marc Espie

02:12 Re: pragma pack on hp-ux John David Anglin

01:56 Re: RFC: logical expression in test directive target lists Janis Johnson

01:54 Ada failures due to -largs Ulrich Weigand

01:33 RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation H. J. Lu

01:18 Re: Arguments for Obj-C++ in GCC 4.0 Joe Buck

00:53 array of unknown bound handling Steven L. Zook

00:03 x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16byte struct Paul Schlie

January 19, 2005

23:43 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar

21:44 Re: Gcc certification Joe Buck

21:32 Re: Gcc certification Janis Johnson

21:15 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Tobias Schlüter

21:15 Re: Gcc certification E. Weddington

20:51 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Toon Moene

20:41 Gcc certification jf

19:49 Re: Issues with gcc 3.4.2 Philipp Thomas

19:05 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler Scott Dudley

18:48 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler David Edelsohn

18:23 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Diego Novillo

18:13 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler Scott Dudley

17:48 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler David Edelsohn

17:47 IA64 alignment problem / how to fix? Steve Ellcey

17:26 Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler Scott Dudley

15:56 Moving to bugzilla 2.19.2 sometime in the next few months Daniel Berlin

15:38 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Mark Mitchell

15:26 correct way to access gcc's own static libs? Jack Howarth

15:03 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Dave Korn

13:17 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt

12:17 Re: cmov and movnti in gcc Tommy Vercetti

12:08 cmov and movnti in gcc Tommy Vercetti

09:21 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther

09:10 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Zdenek Dvorak

09:04 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Ralf Wildenhues

08:21 [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Biagio Lucini

05:20 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell

03:02 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Daniel Jacobowitz

01:59 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Mike Stump

00:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Ulrich Weigand

00:35 Re: I have a problem, help me ... Ben Elliston

00:32 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Mark Mitchell

00:18 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Richard Kenner

00:16 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Richard Kenner

00:14 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Richard Kenner

00:08 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Toon Moene

00:06 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Steven L. Zook

00:03 Re: cvs access problems Ian Lance Taylor

January 16, 2005

21:29 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gerald Pfeifer

21:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar

21:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Ulrich Weigand

20:43 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Joseph S. Myers

20:34 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar

20:32 Re: typeof and bitfields Joseph S. Myers

19:52 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Joseph S. Myers

19:37 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Falk Hueffner

18:09 gcc-4.0-20050116 is now available gccadmin

16:54 cross gnat tools on head question Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp

13:26 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Marc Espie

04:22 Re: How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation? Andrew Pinski

04:18 How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation? Dmitry K.

03:14 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar

03:05 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Tom Tromey

02:48 Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message with an unscannable attachment or body (SYM:01012470573105447031) Administrator

00:10 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Zack Weinberg

January 15, 2005

23:44 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? jlh

23:19 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Gabriel Dos Reis

22:59 openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here] Tommy Vercetti

22:49 openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here] Tommy Vercetti

22:32 Re: Incorrect warning message? Denis Zaitsev

22:07 Re: can't compile 4.0 here Andrew Pinski

22:05 Re: Incorrect warning message? Andreas Schwab

22:04 can't compile 4.0 here Tommy Vercetti

21:41 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Denis Zaitsev

21:29 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Dale Johannesen

21:22 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch

21:22 Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Denis Zaitsev

21:08 Incorrect warning message? Denis Zaitsev

17:02 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Andrew Pinski

15:21 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? jlh

15:12 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? jlh

14:58 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Nick NoSpam

14:42 Re: how to add new instruction Ian Lance Taylor

14:12 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Robert Dewar

13:36 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? jlh

13:27 Re: The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c" jlh

13:24 Re: Test failure, documentation bugs? Luca Benini

12:38 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Eric Botcazou

12:36 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Marc Espie

12:26 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Geert Bosch

12:10 The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c" gan_xiao_jun

11:38 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar

09:58 Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions? Marcel Cox

06:41 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Tom Tromey

05:26 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar

04:53 Re: how to add new instruction apollo

04:47 Re: make install fails? Daniel Jacobowitz

04:28 does gcc remember register values through into functions? Lin Gu

03:52 Re: make install fails? Sam Lauber

03:39 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Nick NoSpam

03:09 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Nick NoSpam

01:56 Re: how to add new instruction James E Wilson

01:53 Re: Test failure, documentation bugs? James E Wilson

01:48 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ? Andrew Pinski

01:20 GCC 3.4.4 ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier

01:06 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT. checkpoint_05lottery

00:32 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT. checkpoint_05lottery

January 13, 2005

23:59 Re: typeof and bitfields Andrew Pinski

23:56 typeof and bitfields Matt Austern

23:51 sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit tbp

23:06 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Paolo Carlini

23:02 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Gabriel Dos Reis

22:48 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 H. J. Lu

22:41 Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Paolo Carlini

22:09 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Kaveh R. Ghazi

21:32 how to add new instruction apollo

21:24 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? James E Wilson

21:17 Re: Will someone answear me? Vladius

21:09 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Richard Henderson

21:06 Re: Will someone answear me? Gerald Pfeifer

20:33 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 Allan B. Cruse

19:35 Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 H. J. Lu

19:33 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin

19:24 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak

19:11 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak

18:44 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT. checkpoint_05lottery

18:29 valgrind shows ada/i-cobol.adb real bug Laurent GUERBY

18:18 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Charles Manning

18:17 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Ian Lance Taylor

18:00 Re: Stack Frame Problem Joe Buck

17:58 Winning Notification checkpoint_05lottery

17:37 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Charles Manning

17:19 Re: [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only onefrom multi-lib configuration. Ralf Corsepius

17:14 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Eric Botcazou

16:52 Re: [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only one from multi-lib configuration. Ian Lance Taylor

16:42 [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only one frommulti-lib configuration. Karel Gardas

16:41 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Duncan Sands

16:20 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Geert Bosch

15:28 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin

15:17 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand

15:16 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Bradley Lucier

15:03 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak

14:49 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Mircea Namolaru

14:33 Re: Stack Frame Problem Ian Lance Taylor

12:38 GraphViz is now free software Florian Weimer

12:28 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Richard Earnshaw

10:39 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Marc Espie

09:14 Stack Frame Problem Peter Bühler

08:35 Re: make install fails? Paolo Bonzini

08:22 make install fails? Uros Bizjak

07:40 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Eric Botcazou

07:37 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Jan Beulich

06:42 Successfull gcc-3.4.3 Installation On SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 huangzb_np

06:20 Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness Ranjit Mathew

05:11 Re: _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics tbp

05:04 Re: _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics Andrew Pinski

05:02 _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics tbp

04:45 Re: About support for architecture: Andrew Pinski

04:42 About support for architecture: siddharth godbole

00:53 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch

00:46 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Geoffrey Keating

00:10 Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT Richard Henderson

00:00 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Richard Henderson

January 09, 2005

21:06 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Geert Bosch

20:32 Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Michael Veksler

18:56 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Richard Guenther

18:37 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Paul Brook

18:20 gcc-4.0-20050109 is now available gccadmin

16:35 Re: pr18241 tests Diego Novillo

15:31 Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set? Andrew Pinski

13:11 Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set? Alan Modra

13:04 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Toon Moene

12:42 Re: pr18241 tests Andreas Jaeger

11:22 pr18241 tests Michael Ritzert

09:43 __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set? Olaf Hering

07:05 Re: how to debug gcc Russell Shaw

06:46 how to debug gcc aram bharathi

04:10 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Giovanni Bajo

01:50 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Matt Austern

00:42 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Gabriel Dos Reis

00:36 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Gabriel Dos Reis

00:14 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Mathieu Malaterre

January 03, 2005

20:33 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Richard Henderson

20:25 Having dg-skip-if on the branches? Kaveh R. Ghazi

20:24 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Henderson

20:22 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie

20:13 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Sam Lauber

19:58 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell

18:20 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Paul Schlie

17:15 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak

17:05 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand

16:58 Re: ChangeLog rotated Gerald Pfeifer

16:55 Re: ChangeLog rotated Joseph S. Myers

16:48 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar

16:40 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie

15:24 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie

14:11 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar

14:08 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar

13:50 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression Daniel Berlin

13:17 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp

13:15 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Giovanni Bajo

12:32 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Florian Weimer

12:26 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar

12:08 Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Gerald Pfeifer

10:45 Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Volker Reichelt

10:33 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Dean Kolosiek

10:11 Re: SSE testcase failure Anders Carlsson

10:05 Re: SSE testcase failure Uros Bizjak

09:47 default_section_type_flags and SECTION_SMALL Jan Beulich

09:30 Re: SSE testcase failure Anders Carlsson

09:29 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp

09:05 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression Uros Bizjak

08:19 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp

07:53 Re: Question about instruction packing Steven Bosscher

07:45 Re: SSE testcase failure Luca Benini

07:34 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Arnaud Charlet

07:34 Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Andreas Jaeger

07:32 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression Uros Bizjak

07:21 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Andreas Jaeger

07:20 Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Hao Qian

06:50 Question about instruction packing Balaji S

06:46 gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp

05:53 Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Dean Kolosiek

05:33 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie

02:49 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Mark Mitchell

01:16 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Sam Lauber

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

23:45	Re: wordsize.h	Jan Zizka
23:43	Re: optimisation question	Joe Buck
23:25	MODES_TIEABLE_P issue. Forwarded test results for libc library routines.	Björn Haase
22:33	Re: optimisation question	Robert Dewar
22:21	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Steve Ellcey
22:15	Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend	Matt Austern
22:08	Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:33	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	James E Wilson
21:22	Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend	Matt Austern
21:12	Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend	Matt Austern
21:06	g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend	Fariborz Jahanian
21:04	Re: Using HAVE_FOO_H and HAVE_FOO	Paul Brook
20:54	Using HAVE_FOO_H and HAVE_FOO	François-Xavier Coudert
20:09	Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to ppc604/vxWorks	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:06	Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to ppc604/vxWorks	jf
19:30	Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...	Marc Espie
19:16	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double	Mark Mitchell
19:12	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:07	Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...	Richard Henderson
19:02	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double	Jonathan Wakely
18:48	Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...	Marc Espie
18:38	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double	Mark Mitchell
18:29	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double	Jonathan Wakely
18:25	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double	Fariborz Jahanian
18:21	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double	Matt Austern
18:16	Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double	Mark Mitchell
17:43	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Steve Ellcey
17:34	g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double	Fariborz Jahanian
17:24	Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...	Richard Henderson
16:52	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Ian Lance Taylor
16:26	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Marc Espie
16:07	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Florian Weimer
16:06	Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?	Ian Lance Taylor
15:57	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Marc Espie
15:42	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Florian Weimer
15:13	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Paolo Bonzini
15:12	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Marc Espie
15:11	wordsize.h	James Tung
14:55	Re: assembler generated code	Karel Gardas
14:48	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Paolo Bonzini
14:37	PATCH: get PCH to fail reliably on OpenBSD	Marc Espie
14:34	Re: optimisation question	Chris Jefferson
14:27	optimisation question	Remy X.O. Martin
13:44	Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2	Gunther Nikl
13:27	exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD...	Marc Espie
13:24	assembler generated code	san bangalore
12:16	OpenBSD pch, take 2	Marc Espie
10:15	Re: New option?	Paolo Bonzini
09:54	Re: Bootstrap broken because of warning	Martin Reinecke
09:49	Bootstrap broken because of warning	Martin Reinecke
09:20	Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?	Øyvind Harboe
08:56	Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(20050127) on MICO sources	Karel Gardas
08:46	tree-ssa-dom.c Bug or not?	Marcin Dalecki
07:14	Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	Björn Haase
05:03	Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?	Ian Lance Taylor
04:52	Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?	Ian Lance Taylor
03:40	Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	Mike Stump
03:24	Re: <netdb.h>	Jan Zizka
01:38	<netdb.h>	James Tung

23:32	Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works	Ben Elliston
20:22	Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	Björn Haase
19:57	gcc-4.0-20050130 is now available	gccadmin
18:46	Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding?	Ramana Radhakrishnan
17:09	Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?	sean darcy
17:00	Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?	sean darcy
16:32	Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	Andy Hutchinson
16:16	Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	Björn Haase
07:09	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Eric Botcazou
06:23	Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding?	Paul Schlie
05:44	Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding?	Paul Schlie
05:05	Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding?	Ramana Radhakrishnan
04:54	How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified forsetjump coding?	Paul Schlie
03:02	Sorry my website was down!	Want something for Free? OK it
01:59	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:23	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
01:16	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:14	Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?	Sam Lauber
00:28	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
00:24	Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?	James A. Morrison

23:34	Re: template_decl's	Stefan Strasser
23:20	Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?	Falk Hueffner
23:08	-march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ?	sean darcy
20:48	Why is there no arg_pointer_needed?	Øyvind Harboe
18:28	Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	Andy Hutchinson
15:55	template_decl's	Stefan Strasser
15:45	Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	Björn Haase
13:44	Status of PR19300?	Christian Joensson
02:02	New option?	Sam Lauber
01:31	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Dale Johannesen
01:15	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Roger Sayle
00:52	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Dale Johannesen

23:52	gcc-3.4-20050128 is now available	gccadmin
23:43	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Dale Johannesen
23:39	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	James E Wilson
23:38	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
22:24	Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite	Øyvind Harboe
21:59	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
21:54	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?	Mike Stump
21:50	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	Richard Henderson
21:50	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Roger Sayle
21:43	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
21:39	Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite	Mike Stump
21:08	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	Richard Henderson
20:59	Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c	Andrew MacLeod
20:57	Re: mudflap problem	Frank Ch. Eigler
20:44	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Dale Johannesen
19:58	linear_search_fdes problem on linux	Sanjiv Pandey
19:39	Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:15	Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type	Devang Patel
19:01	TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type	Joseph S. Myers
18:36	Re: mudflap problem	Frank Ch. Eigler
18:09	new mirror	Mr david deng
17:00	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Steve Ellcey
16:23	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
16:10	Re: Continuing GCCNews	rd flowers
16:10	Re: typeof throws away the reference	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:04	Re: typeof throws away the reference	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:54	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
15:31	Re: Continuing GCCNews	Daniel Berlin
15:16	Re: Continuing GCCNews	Giovanni Bajo
15:15	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?	Remy X.O. Martin
15:07	Re: typeof throws away the reference	Andrew Pinski
15:06	Re: Continuing GCCNews	Giovanni Bajo
15:04	Re: typeof throws away the reference	Giovanni Bajo
14:58	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?	Remy X.O. Martin
14:48	typeof throws away the reference	Jari Petter Sundell
13:54	Failures in gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/copysign1.c execution on i686	Uros Bizjak
13:53	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?	Jonathan Wilson
13:27	Re: Continuing GCCNews	rd flowers
12:18	Re: Building Supergraph (at call graph level)	Steven Bosscher
12:04	Building Supergraph (at call graph level)	Virender Kashyap
10:52	Re: Continuing GCCNews	Giovanni Bajo
08:46	Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help	Olivier Hainque
08:44	Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help	Olivier Hainque
08:38	Re: [PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64	Steven Bosscher
08:12	[PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64	Uros Bizjak
08:05	Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite	Øyvind Harboe
07:07	doubts in adding new instruction	aram bharathi
05:54	Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Miles Bader
05:50	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?	Andi Kleen
05:49	Re: Continuing GCCNews	rd flowers
05:32	Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64	Andreas Jaeger
05:09	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?	Stan Shebs
04:34	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?	Dale Johannesen
04:22	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?	Matt Austern
03:27	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?	Alexander Strange
03:18	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?	Stan Shebs
02:27	Bootstrap broken on x86-64	Diego Novillo
00:43	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Richard Henderson
00:42	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Andrew Pinski
00:21	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Dale Johannesen
00:04	Re: RFC: PR 19650	Roger Sayle

23:24	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Steve Ellcey
23:20	RFC: PR 19650	Dale Johannesen
22:55	Re: link problem: BFD: Warning: Writing section `.text' to huge	Ian Lance Taylor
22:21	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?	Mike Stump
22:18	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Mike Stump
22:05	Re: Any issue with anon CVS?	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
22:04	Re: Any issue with anon CVS?	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
21:55	link problem: BFD: Warning: Writing section `.text' to huge	Virgil Anuichi
21:55	Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?	Andrew Pinski
21:47	Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?	Remy X.O. Martin
21:46	Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help	Bruce Korb
21:41	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc3.4.x	Remy X.O. Martin
21:19	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Marc Espie
20:48	Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c	Daniel Berlin
20:41	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Mike Stump
20:15	Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c	Jeffrey A Law
18:08	Re: Any issue with anon CVS?	Karel Gardas
17:53	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Alfred M. Szmidt
17:39	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Marcin Dalecki
17:34	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Marcin Dalecki
17:03	Any issue with anon CVS?	Karel Gardas
16:47	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
16:37	Re: Continuing GCCNews	E. Weddington
16:24	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	Uros Bizjak
16:17	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Alfred M. Szmidt
15:41	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Tommy Vercetti
15:40	Continuing GCCNews	R. D. Flowers
15:34	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking	Dan Kegel
15:20	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
13:17	Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	Uros Bizjak
12:44	Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC	Kazu Hirata
11:36	-mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles	tbp
11:31	Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite	Joseph S. Myers
11:20	Re: meaning of floating-point comparison operators	Miles Bader
09:56	Re: meaning of floating-point comparison operators	Richard Earnshaw
09:01	meaning of floating-point comparison operators	Miles Bader
08:39	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking	Rene Rebe
07:17	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Jakub Jelinek
07:12	setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite	Øyvind Harboe
04:29	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
04:22	Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC	John David Anglin
04:06	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Marcin Dalecki
04:03	Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use	James E Wilson
03:51	Re: how to pack data using gcc compiler?	James E Wilson
02:11	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Ian Lance Taylor
02:10	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking	Dan Kegel
01:02	MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no	HutchinsonAndy
00:19	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko

23:52	Re: float returned in xmm0	Steven Bosscher
23:47	gcc-3.3-20050126 is now available	gccadmin
23:40	float returned in xmm0	Maurizio Monge
23:17	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Jakub Jelinek
22:27	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking	Randy.Dunlap
22:22	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Joe Buck
22:21	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Alfred M. Szmidt
22:01	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
21:58	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
21:56	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Alfred M. Szmidt
21:54	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Joe Buck
21:23	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
20:08	mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c	Daniel Berlin
19:48	Re: how to pack data using gcc compiler?	Ian Lance Taylor
19:44	how to pack data using gcc compiler?	Michael Sung
19:42	Re: Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn	James E Wilson
19:21	Re: make header flag	James E Wilson
18:27	Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC	Jeffrey A Law
18:26	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Steve Ellcey
18:17	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Richard Henderson
18:05	Re: define_constants and tm.h	Zack Weinberg
17:23	Re: Bugzilla misbehaving?!?	Daniel Berlin
17:22	Re: Bugzilla misbehaving?!?	Frank Ch. Eigler
17:17	Bugzilla misbehaving?!?	Paolo Carlini
16:34	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Alfred M. Szmidt
16:30	Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC	Kazu Hirata
16:29	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Steve Ellcey
16:22	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
16:12	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Ulrich Weigand
16:02	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Marcin Dalecki
16:01	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Mostafa Hagog
16:00	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Andrew Pinski
15:56	Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC	John David Anglin
15:53	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
15:48	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Ulrich Weigand
15:48	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Ulrich Weigand
14:59	[gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment	Ted Teah via RT
14:54	A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC	Kazu Hirata
14:27	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
14:21	define_constants and tm.h	Bernd Jendrissek
14:05	Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use	Paolo Bonzini
11:38	PUSH and POP next to first/last register use	Sami Khawam
11:02	Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...	Jonathan Wakely
09:18	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Richard Guenther
08:58	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Richard Guenther
08:44	Re: FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse?	Uros Bizjak
07:14	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Marcus Meissner
06:47	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking	Dan Kegel
03:28	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	Zack Weinberg
02:38	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Daniel Berlin
02:34	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
02:07	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Nicola Pero
02:04	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Mark Mitchell
01:56	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Mike Stump
01:54	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:51	Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Richard Henderson
01:38	Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.	Richard Kenner
01:32	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	浅尾忍
01:28	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Nicola Pero
01:17	Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.	Andrew Pinski
01:16	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Steven Bosscher
01:14	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Nicola Pero
01:13	Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL	Steve Ellcey
00:48	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Gregory John Casamento
00:32	Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.	Richard Kenner
00:29	Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them alwaysinto long data	James E Wilson
00:17	Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data	Richard Henderson
00:12	Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data	Steve Ellcey
00:06	Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...	Richard Henderson

23:52	Re: SSE scalar/float transition	tbp
23:49	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Ulrich Weigand
23:43	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Richard Henderson
23:38	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Richard Henderson
23:24	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
23:20	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
23:20	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Dale Johannesen
23:10	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Richard Henderson
23:09	Re: SSE scalar/float transition	Richard Henderson
23:08	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Mike Frysinger
23:04	Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets	Richard Henderson
22:56	Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
22:49	Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Daniel Berlin
22:43	Objective-C bugs and GCC releases	Gregory John Casamento
22:32	forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking	Edward Peschko
22:32	Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation	Alan Modra
21:15	Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?	Andreas Schwab
20:36	SSE scalar/float transition	tbp
19:48	Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation	Ian Lance Taylor
19:11	Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code	Dale Johannesen
18:29	Re: Building gcc	Paul Brook
18:19	Building gcc	Halldór Ísak Gylfasson
17:47	Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Daniel Berlin
17:43	Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Daniel Berlin
17:42	Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Joe Buck
17:40	Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b	Joe Buck
17:33	Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs	Joe Buck
17:29	Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Daniel Berlin
17:27	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
17:25	Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Joe Buck
17:21	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Richard Guenther
17:07	Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Daniel Berlin
17:05	Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Paolo Carlini
16:59	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
16:58	Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?	Geert Bosch
16:58	Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org	Daniel Berlin
16:57	Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works	Nix
16:54	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Richard Guenther
16:50	Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?	Andreas Schwab
16:44	[BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insnsets	Uros Bizjak
16:35	Re: typeof and bitfields	Olly Betts
16:32	Re:Incorrect C++ code or regression?	Pierre Chatelier
16:23	Re: Incorrect C++ code or regression?	Giovanni Bajo
16:16	Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?	Geert Bosch
16:07	Incorrect C++ code or regression?	Grumble
16:05	Re: -mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
15:43	Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b	tm_gccmail
14:58	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
14:46	Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Daniel Berlin
14:23	Away from email	Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
14:23	Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute	Andrew Pinski
14:20	Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:17	-mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question	Uros Bizjak
14:09	Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute	Andrew Pinski
14:08	What to do with the transparent_union attribute	Steven Bosscher
13:54	Strange compiler error with g++ 3.3	Peter Cech
13:29	bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output?	Jan Beulich
13:03	PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?	Richard Guenther
12:04	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Mostafa Hagog
11:56	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Mostafa Hagog
11:44	Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?	Georg Bauhaus
02:55	Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?	J.T. Conklin
02:42	Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?	Sam Lauber
02:38	Migrate to Autotest for testing framework?	Sam Lauber
00:28	Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc	James A. Morrison
00:04	Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs	Joseph S. Myers

23:59	Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs	Andrew Pinski
23:58	Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs	Daniel Berlin
23:56	Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs	Joseph S. Myers
23:44	wikidata dir added to htdocs	Daniel Berlin
18:33	gcc-4.0-20050123 is now available	gccadmin
18:27	Re: GCC 3.4.4 ?	Mark Mitchell
15:34	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Ulrich Weigand
15:34	Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code	Robert Dewar
14:05	Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code	Andreas Schwab
14:01	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21]	Steven Bosscher
13:34	Re: HELP (change in control flow desired)	Virender Kashyap
13:17	Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc	Tommy Vercetti
13:11	Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc	James A. Morrison
12:55	can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc	Tommy Vercetti
12:42	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Clifford Wolf
04:43	Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:34	Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status	Roger Sayle
02:07	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Richard Henderson
00:54	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Remy Martin
00:30	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Andrew Pinski
00:28	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Remy Martin
00:05	Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Ayal Zaks

23:30	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Richard Henderson
23:09	Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code	Robert Dewar
22:43	Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code	Jonathan Wakely
22:43	Re: GCC 3.4.4 ?	Daniel Jensen
22:16	Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:58	GCC rejecting (I think) valid code	Sam Lauber
21:36	Re: Gcc certification	jf
18:51	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	H. J. Lu
18:37	Re: Ada failures due to -largs	Eric Botcazou
18:08	Re: Ada failures due to -largs	Ulrich Weigand
17:44	Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Andrew Pinski
17:41	longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x	Remy X.O. Martin
17:38	Re: HELP (change in control flow desired)	Andrew Pinski
17:36	Re: HELP (change in control flow desired)	Daniel Berlin
17:35	Re: Ada failures due to -largs	Eric Botcazou
17:35	HELP (change in control flow desired)	Virender Kashyap
17:32	Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn	Robert Baruch
13:21	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	Marc Espie
09:47	Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?	Marc Espie
02:12	Re: pragma pack on hp-ux	John David Anglin
01:56	Re: RFC: logical expression in test directive target lists	Janis Johnson
01:54	Ada failures due to -largs	Ulrich Weigand
01:33	RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation	H. J. Lu
01:18	Re: Arguments for Obj-C++ in GCC 4.0	Joe Buck
00:53	array of unknown bound handling	Steven L. Zook
00:03	x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16byte struct	Paul Schlie

23:48	gcc-3.4-20050121 is now available	gccadmin
23:43	Deprecated -I-, any good replacement?	Sam Ravnborg
23:20	Arguments for Obj-C++ in GCC 4.0	Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
20:55	pragma pack on hp-ux	Eric Frias
20:51	Re: Gcc certification	Toon Moene
20:30	RFC: logical expression in test directive target lists	Janis Johnson
20:04	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:50	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Mark Mitchell
19:47	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Andrew Pinski
19:38	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Mark Mitchell
18:23	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Paul Brook
18:10	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Bernd Schmidt
18:04	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Mark Mitchell
17:58	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Jeffrey A Law
17:46	GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21]	Mark Mitchell
17:42	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Jeffrey A Law
17:34	GCC-3.3.6 release status	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:31	Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0	Mark Mitchell
17:28	Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0	Joe Buck
16:51	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Giovanni Bajo
16:20	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	Marcin Dalecki
16:16	Re: Bootstrap failure?	Bruce Korb
15:04	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Ian Lance Taylor
14:54	Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0	Steven Bosscher
14:47	Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0	Kelley Cook
10:52	Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Jakub Jelinek
10:51	Successful build of gcc 3.2 on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1.	Raffaele Rubino
10:38	fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?	Richard Guenther
10:34	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Kai Ruottu
08:25	Re: typeof and bitfields	Nathan Sidwell
07:59	Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0	Mark Mitchell
07:56	Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0	Eric Botcazou
06:45	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	H. J. Lu
06:39	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	Zack Weinberg
06:26	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	Ian Lance Taylor
06:15	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	Andrew Pinski
06:06	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	浅尾忍
05:52	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	H. J. Lu
05:46	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	Ian Lance Taylor
05:37	Re: Bootstrap failure?	Eric Botcazou
05:18	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	H. J. Lu
05:13	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	Zack Weinberg
05:07	Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	Ian Lance Taylor
04:57	RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation?	H. J. Lu
04:56	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	浅尾忍
04:26	Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	Zack Weinberg
03:11	Bootstrap failure?	Bruce Korb
02:16	a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler.	浅尾忍
01:59	x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16 byte struct	Gary Funck
00:24	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:15	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Diego Novillo
00:10	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Joe Buck
00:05	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Daniel Berlin
00:03	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Daniel Berlin
00:00	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Joe Buck

23:56	Re: bug in head, can't compile	Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
23:47	Re: Gcc certification	Robert Dewar
23:46	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Steven Bosscher
23:44	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Diego Novillo
23:40	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:35	bug in head, can't compile	Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
23:29	Re: Gcc certification	Joe Buck
23:05	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Daniel Berlin
23:01	Re: Gcc certification	Robert Dewar
22:50	Re: Gcc certification	Joe Buck
22:48	Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Joe Buck
22:43	Computer to Plate - Digital - Mitsubishi Genesis DPX 5080	Extremeliquidators.com
22:41	Re: Gcc certification	Robert Dewar
22:41	Computer to Plate - Digital - Mitsubishi Genesis DPX 5080	Extremeliquidators.com
21:40	Links between bugzilla and gccwiki	Daniel Berlin
21:06	Re: Gcc certification	jf
20:57	Re: Gcc certification	Robert Dewar
20:51	Re: Gcc certification	jf
20:44	Re: Gcc certification	Robert Dewar
20:43	Re: Gcc certification	Robert Dewar
20:37	Re: Is mainline still in Stage 3?	Ian Lance Taylor
20:25	Re: Gcc certification	jf
20:19	Re: Gcc certification	jf
20:18	Re: current mainline, port status	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:17	Re: Gcc certification	jf
20:13	Re: Gcc certification	jf
19:59	archive of http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/linux_compilers/	Benjamin Kosnik
19:47	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Daniel Berlin
19:41	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Zack Weinberg
19:27	postreload-gcse heuristics broken?	Ulrich Weigand
19:19	Re: Sign extension of const_int rtx	Richard Henderson
19:12	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Daniel Berlin
19:10	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Zack Weinberg
19:04	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Daniel Berlin
19:03	Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?	Richard Henderson
18:56	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Zack Weinberg
18:48	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Daniel Berlin
18:46	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Zack Weinberg
18:42	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Zack Weinberg
18:38	Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works	Ted Sung
18:31	Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?	Steve Ellcey
18:30	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Bruce Korb
18:16	Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?	Richard Henderson
18:14	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Kenneth Zadeck
17:40	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Kenneth Zadeck
17:29	Is mainline still in Stage 3?	Peter Barada
17:26	Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?	Steve Ellcey
17:21	Sign extension of const_int rtx	Paul Brook
17:21	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Bruce Korb
17:13	Re: a question about fix-header.c	Bruce Korb
13:22	gcc-bugs ml archive [Thread-Prev] == [Date-Prev]	Brian Inglis
11:39	Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers	Neil Booth
10:59	Successful build of gcc 3.4.3	Paul Hunt
08:14	Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote	Ralf Wildenhues
04:42	Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3	James E Wilson
04:16	Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs	Geert Bosch
03:53	Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3	Edward Peschko
03:48	Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs	Richard Henderson
03:18	Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3	Giovanni Bajo
02:45	3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3	Edward Peschko
02:22	RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions	Joseph S. Myers
02:20	Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs	DJ Delorie
02:06	Re: cmov and movnti in gcc	James E Wilson
01:56	Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers	Andrew Pinski
01:45	Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers	Matt Austern
01:43	Re: correct way to access gcc's own static libs?	James E Wilson
01:42	Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers	Mark Mitchell
01:36	Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works	James E Wilson
01:19	Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs	James E Wilson
00:23	Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler	David Edelsohn
00:20	typedefs and elaborated type specifiers	Matt Austern
00:14	Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix?	Richard Henderson
00:13	gcc-3.3-20050119 is now available	gccadmin

23:57	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Henderson
23:53	cvs access problems	Bud Davis
23:50	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	Chris Lattner
23:41	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	Richard Henderson
23:32	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	James E Wilson
23:12	Re: Incorrect warning message?	Denis Zaitsev
23:12	Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch	Gerald Pfeifer
23:05	Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote	Ralf Wildenhues
23:05	Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e	Steven Bosscher
23:04	Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e	Diego Novillo
22:55	ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e	Richard Kenner
22:51	Re: I have a problem, help me ...	Gerald Pfeifer
22:37	Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote	Mike Stump
22:36	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Guenther
22:30	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	Chris Lattner
22:28	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	Richard Henderson
22:06	precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote	Ralf Wildenhues
22:03	Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions	Mark Mitchell
21:39	dynamic library version crashes but static version works	Ted Sung
21:37	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	Chris Lattner
21:35	Re: No .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support?	James E Wilson
21:24	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	James E Wilson
21:15	Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions	Steven L. Zook
21:07	Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?	Richard Henderson
20:47	Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?	Robert Dewar
20:39	Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?	Marc Espie
20:38	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
20:18	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Henderson
20:09	Floating point problems (accuracy).	Phil Prentice
20:06	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	Eljay Love-Jensen
20:01	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Andrew Pinski
20:00	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Guenther
19:57	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Mark Mitchell
19:57	Re: PCH relocation ?	Mark Mitchell
19:55	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Mark Mitchell
19:54	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Guenther
19:52	Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).	Joe Hughes
19:52	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Giovanni Bajo
19:51	Re: PCH relocation ?	Richard Guenther
19:47	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Mark Mitchell
19:44	Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?	Richard Henderson
19:39	Re: PCH relocation ?	Mark Mitchell
19:27	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:15	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Joe Buck
19:08	Re: typeof and bitfields	Matt Austern
18:54	Re: typeof and bitfields	Tom Tromey
18:53	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
18:43	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
18:42	RE: typeof and bitfields	Dave Korn
18:31	Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?	Zack Weinberg
18:29	Re: typeof and bitfields	Mark Mitchell
18:07	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:05	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
17:28	Re: typeof and bitfields	Mark Mitchell
17:18	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:12	Re: typeof and bitfields	Andreas Schwab
17:04	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
16:40	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Jonathan Wakely
16:27	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Guenther
16:23	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Guenther
16:19	Re: openssl speed tests	Giovanni Bajo
16:02	openssl speed tests	Tommy Vercetti
16:01	Re: typeof and bitfields	Andreas Schwab
15:56	Re: Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block.	Diego Novillo
15:55	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Ulrich Weigand
15:52	Re: Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block.	Zdenek Dvorak
15:25	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Giovanni Bajo
15:25	Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block.	Kazu Hirata
15:20	Re: Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot	Michael Cieslinski
15:03	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
14:44	Re: [dj@redhat.com: ./ diff Makefile.def Makefile.in Makefile.tpl]	Alexandre Oliva
14:33	Re: [Ada] Can't bootstrap gcc cvs 20050118 on i686-cygwin: ada/exp_ch2.adb:722: undefined reference to `_exp_ch2__expand_current_value__in_appropriate_scope.634'	Andrew Pinski
14:27	Re: openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here]	Tommy Vercetti
14:01	[Ada] Can't bootstrap gcc cvs 20050118 on i686-cygwin: ada/exp_ch2.adb:722: undefined reference to `_exp_ch2__expand_current_value__in_appropriate_scope.634'	Christian Joensson
12:52	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
12:50	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
12:42	Re: [dj@redhat.com: ./ diff Makefile.def Makefile.in Makefile.tpl]	Kelley Cook
11:57	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:22	trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ?	Marc Espie
09:59	No .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support?	Dr. Franz Fehringer
09:30	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Richard Guenther
08:34	Re: SPE configuration in GCC	Olivier Hainque
08:28	Re: typeof and bitfields	Mark Mitchell
07:58	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Marcin Dalecki
07:51	I have a problem, help me ...	labam at rambler dot ru labam
06:37	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Kevin Puetz
06:20	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
05:45	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Marcin Dalecki
05:00	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
04:58	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
03:36	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Marcin Dalecki
03:35	RE: a treelang question about printf.	Der-Johng Sun
03:33	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Marcin Dalecki
03:14	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Marcin Dalecki
02:39	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
01:08	Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:00	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:26	Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch	Mike Stump
00:15	Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?	Joseph S. Myers

21:29	Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch	Gerald Pfeifer
21:16	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
21:09	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Ulrich Weigand
20:43	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Joseph S. Myers
20:34	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
20:32	Re: typeof and bitfields	Joseph S. Myers
19:52	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Joseph S. Myers
19:37	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?	Falk Hueffner
18:09	gcc-4.0-20050116 is now available	gccadmin
16:54	cross gnat tools on head question	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
13:26	Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?	Marc Espie
04:22	Re: How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation?	Andrew Pinski
04:18	How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation?	Dmitry K.
03:14	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
03:05	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Tom Tromey
02:48	Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message with an unscannable attachment or body (SYM:01012470573105447031)	Administrator
00:10	Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?	Zack Weinberg

23:44	Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?	jlh
23:19	Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:59	openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here]	Tommy Vercetti
22:49	openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here]	Tommy Vercetti
22:32	Re: Incorrect warning message?	Denis Zaitsev
22:07	Re: can't compile 4.0 here	Andrew Pinski
22:05	Re: Incorrect warning message?	Andreas Schwab
22:04	can't compile 4.0 here	Tommy Vercetti
21:41	Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?	Denis Zaitsev
21:29	Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?	Dale Johannesen
21:22	Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?	Robert Baruch
21:22	Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section?	Denis Zaitsev
21:08	Incorrect warning message?	Denis Zaitsev
17:02	Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?	Andrew Pinski
15:21	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?	jlh
15:12	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?	jlh
14:58	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?	Nick NoSpam
14:42	Re: how to add new instruction	Ian Lance Taylor
14:12	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?	Robert Dewar
13:36	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me?	jlh
13:27	Re: The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c"	jlh
13:24	Re: Test failure, documentation bugs?	Luca Benini
12:38	Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?	Eric Botcazou
12:36	Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?	Marc Espie
12:26	Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ?	Geert Bosch
12:10	The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c"	gan_xiao_jun
11:38	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
09:58	Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions?	Marcel Cox
06:41	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Tom Tromey
05:26	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
04:53	Re: how to add new instruction	apollo
04:47	Re: make install fails?	Daniel Jacobowitz
04:28	does gcc remember register values through into functions?	Lin Gu
03:52	Re: make install fails?	Sam Lauber
03:39	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?	Nick NoSpam
03:09	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?	Nick NoSpam
01:56	Re: how to add new instruction	James E Wilson
01:53	Re: Test failure, documentation bugs?	James E Wilson
01:48	Re: GCC 3.4.4 ?	Andrew Pinski
01:20	GCC 3.4.4 ?	Frédéric L. W. Meunier
01:06	NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT.	checkpoint_05lottery
00:32	NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT.	checkpoint_05lottery

23:47	Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-(	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:40	gcc-3.4-20050114 is now available	gccadmin
23:27	Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-(	Christopher Faylor
22:40	RE:: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	ctmb1mf
22:09	NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT.	checkpoint_05lottery
21:49	Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)	H. J. Lu
21:34	Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?	James E Wilson
20:33	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Steven Bosscher
20:28	RE: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	ctmb1mf
20:25	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Toon Moene
19:43	RE: typeof and bitfields	Dave Korn
19:41	RE: typeof and bitfields	Dave Korn
19:21	RE: typeof and bitfields	Andrew Haley
19:21	RE: typeof and bitfields	Andrew Haley
18:27	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
17:19	Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdumpbug-report)	E. Weddington
16:50	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:45	RE: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
16:36	Re: typeof and bitfields	Andreas Schwab
16:11	Re: typeof and bitfields	Ian Lance Taylor
16:11	RE: \bintuils and gcc system requirements	Dave Korn
16:00	RE: typeof and bitfields	Dave Korn
15:48	Re: valgrind shows ada/i-cobol.adb real bug	Robert Dewar
15:33	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
14:54	Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?	Ian Lance Taylor
13:38	Re: \bintuils and gcc system requirements	Andrew Pinski
13:32	\bintuils and gcc system requirements	kslindee
12:08	gcc 3.4.3 installed succefully on Debian 3.0 i586-pc-linux-gnu linux-2.4.27 libc6-2.2.5	cp
11:47	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Mircea Namolaru
11:44	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Bernd Schmidt
10:26	Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ?	Pierre Chatelier
10:23	Re: typeof and bitfields	Andreas Schwab
10:14	Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays?	Paul Brook
09:17	Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays?	Richard Guenther
07:32	Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)	Bernd Jendrissek
06:31	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
06:11	Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)	Allan B. Cruse
04:27	Re: how to add new instruction	apollo
04:16	Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload?	Robert Baruch
04:05	Re: typeof and bitfields	Matt Austern
03:21	Re: how to add new instruction	Ian Lance Taylor
03:03	Re: typeof and bitfields	Ian Lance Taylor
02:46	Re: typeof and bitfields	Neil Booth
02:12	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:35	Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays?	James E Wilson
01:35	Re: typeof and bitfields	Paul Schlie
01:33	Re: typeof and bitfields	Matt Austern
00:59	Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)	Alan Modra
00:50	Re: typeof and bitfields	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:37	Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4	Alan Modra
00:27	Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report)	H. J. Lu
00:19	Re: typeof and bitfields	Andrew Pinski
00:17	Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4	Alan Modra
00:15	Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4	Thorsten Glaser
00:13	Re: sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit	tbp
00:13	Re: typeof and bitfields	Matt Austern
00:04	Re: sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit	Richard Henderson

23:54	Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check	Duncan Sands
23:42	Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check	Olly Betts
23:41	Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?	Ian Lance Taylor
23:30	Re: ARM thumb interworking hole?	Charles Manning
23:24	gcc-3.3-20050112 is now available	gccadmin
23:21	Re: Linking static and dynamic libraries	Ben Elliston
23:21	Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:11	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Richard Henderson
22:27	Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness	Kelley Cook
22:21	mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes	Bradley Lucier
21:47	Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Matt Austern
21:20	I think I understood what You want.(Was:Re: New logo gone vectorised.(SVG format))	Vladius
20:44	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
20:23	Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Aaron W. LaFramboise
20:21	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Aldy Hernandez
19:58	Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT	James A. Morrison
19:47	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
19:33	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Daniel Berlin
19:32	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Richard Henderson
19:27	Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT	Steve Kargl
19:25	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
18:43	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Daniel Berlin
18:39	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Eric Botcazou
18:39	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
18:34	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	David Edelsohn
18:32	Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Thorsten Glaser
18:31	Test failure, documentation bugs?	Luca Benini
18:26	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Daniel Berlin
18:23	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Aldy Hernandez
18:21	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	David Edelsohn
18:18	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
18:18	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
18:08	Linking static and dynamic libraries	Roman Pagac
18:07	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Eric Botcazou
17:53	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Aldy Hernandez
17:42	"make bubblestrap" weirdness	Kelley Cook
17:15	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Eric Botcazou
16:55	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Aldy Hernandez
15:59	Vague answer "better"	rd flowers
15:58	Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Vladius
15:43	Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Ian Lance Taylor
15:30	comment / code incosistency in cfgcleanup.c:flow_find_cross_jump	Joern RENNECKE
14:32	New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format)	Vladius
13:27	Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT	James Morrison
12:45	Re: New GCC logotype development.	Robert Dewar
12:02	Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)	Jan Beulich
11:59	Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)	Jan Beulich
11:51	Re: New GCC logotype development.	Florian Weimer
11:46	Re: OpenGL works! Was: Re: GCJ and OpenGL under Win32	Ranjit Mathew
11:35	"make bubblestrap" weirdness	Ranjit Mathew
10:54	Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check	Duncan Sands
10:36	ACATS tests that fail valgrind - differences between pre-ssa and current	Duncan Sands
10:20	ACATS tests that fail valgrind check - pre-ssa baseline	Duncan Sands
10:16	Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check	Arnaud Charlet
10:10	ACATS tests that fail valgrind check	Duncan Sands
09:50	Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)	Richard Henderson
09:20	Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)	Jan Beulich
09:10	Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)	Richard Henderson
08:56	Re: new-new-ra thoughts	Eric Botcazou
08:09	Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?	Paolo Bonzini
08:06	Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64)	Jan Beulich
07:14	Re: OpenGL works! Was: Re: GCJ and OpenGL under Win32	Ranjit Mathew
02:55	Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars	James E Wilson
01:55	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Neil Booth
01:32	Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)	Robert Dewar
01:15	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Robert Dewar
01:12	Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)	James A. Morrison
01:12	Re: ChangeLog rotated	Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:10	Re: ChangeLog rotated	Ian Lance Taylor
00:31	Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars	DJ Delorie
00:21	Re: new-new-ra thoughts	James E Wilson
00:18	Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters	Neil Booth

21:06	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)	Geert Bosch
20:32	Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ?	Michael Veksler
18:56	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)	Richard Guenther
18:37	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)	Paul Brook
18:20	gcc-4.0-20050109 is now available	gccadmin
16:35	Re: pr18241 tests	Diego Novillo
15:31	Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set?	Andrew Pinski
13:11	Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set?	Alan Modra
13:04	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)	Toon Moene
12:42	Re: pr18241 tests	Andreas Jaeger
11:22	pr18241 tests	Michael Ritzert
09:43	__uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set?	Olaf Hering
07:05	Re: how to debug gcc	Russell Shaw
06:46	how to debug gcc	aram bharathi
04:10	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)	Giovanni Bajo
01:50	Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file	Matt Austern
00:42	Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:36	Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:14	Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file	Mathieu Malaterre

23:42	[MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file	Mathieu Malaterre
23:37	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
23:26	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:47	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
22:40	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:13	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
22:10	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:11	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Russ Allbery
19:35	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
19:32	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:16	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
18:57	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53	Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?	Marc Espie
18:36	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
17:21	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
16:45	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Olaf Hering
16:43	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:39	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:33	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Olaf Hering
16:31	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:30	Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?	Andrew Pinski
16:27	Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?	Florian Weimer
16:23	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Daniel Berlin
16:05	how can I tell ada it's been moved around ?	Marc Espie
16:03	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Olaf Hering
15:59	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Olaf Hering
13:50	Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).	Luca Benini
12:27	Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build	Toon Moene
10:16	Will someone answear me?	Vladius
10:04	Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).	Vladius
06:39	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Sam Lauber
06:30	Successfull gcc-3.4.3 Installation On SCO OpenServer 5.0.6	Benben
05:50	Re: avr-back-end: instruction splitting issue	Denis Chertykov
05:50	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Denis Chertykov
00:40	avr-back-end: instruction splitting issue	Bj=F6rn=20Haase
00:39	Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:25	gcc-3.4-20050107 is now available	gccadmin

23:59	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Robert Dewar
23:42	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Richard Henderson
23:11	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Joe Buck
22:58	Re: discouraging register use	Geoffrey Keating
22:55	Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build	Toon Moene
20:49	Re: c++ stub generator	Nick Ing-Simmons
20:31	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	tbp
20:24	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Diego Novillo
20:21	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Steven Bosscher
20:13	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	tbp
20:05	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Denis Chertykov
19:55	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Mark Mitchell
19:50	Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED	Daniel Berlin
19:48	Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED	Diego Novillo
19:45	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Marcin Dalecki
19:40	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Steve Kargl
18:55	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Richard Henderson
18:21	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Steven Bosscher
17:59	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Kai Henningsen
17:51	Re: new-new-ra thoughts	Denis Chertykov
17:51	Re: new-new-ra thoughts	Denis Chertykov
17:42	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Denis Chertykov
17:42	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Denis Chertykov
17:42	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Denis Chertykov
17:42	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Denis Chertykov
17:23	Re: strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha?	Nick Clifton
17:07	ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b	Brandan C Lennox
17:00	strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha ?	Jim McCarthy
16:44	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	tbp
16:20	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Mark Mitchell
15:43	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Andrew Pinski
15:42	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Steve Kargl
15:36	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Richard Sandiford
13:44	A question about a test	Luca Benini
13:44	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	tbp
13:35	Re: Adding new register	Paul Brook
13:28	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Steven Bosscher
12:47	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	tbp
11:41	Re: ia64 vector mode support	Jan Beulich
10:58	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Robert Dewar
10:37	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Luca Benini
10:13	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Andreas Jaeger
09:13	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Luca Benini
07:49	Re: Download	Mostafa Hagog
07:46	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Andreas Jaeger
07:39	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Luca Benini
07:29	Download	Rajkishore Barik
07:21	Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build	Andreas Jaeger
07:10	Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build	Toon Moene
06:52	Adding new register	Petar Penchev
06:43	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Andreas Jaeger
00:13	Re: some remarks about gcc4.0	Richard Henderson

23:33	gcc-3.3-20050105 is now available	gccadmin
23:13	some remarks about gcc4.0	tbp
22:55	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Denis Zaitsev
22:45	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:41	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Ken Raeburn
22:40	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:33	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Andrew Pinski
22:31	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Andrew Pinski
22:30	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Denis Zaitsev
22:26	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Denis Zaitsev
22:17	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Andrew Pinski
22:10	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Denis Zaitsev
22:04	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
21:27	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Robert Dewar
21:21	Re: ia64 mulv8qi3 expander	Richard Henderson
21:04	Re: [gcc3.4.0] ARM/uClinux libstdc++ build.	Karel Gardas
20:06	Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Andrew Pinski
20:04	-mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron?	Steve Kargl
19:24	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Richard Kenner
19:05	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Mike Hearn
18:50	Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions	Joe Buck
18:48	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Andrew Pinski
18:47	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Mike Hearn
18:35	Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions	Andrew Pinski
18:28	Re: discouraging register use	DJ Delorie
18:21	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Andrew Pinski
17:52	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Joe Buck
17:48	Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions	Joe Buck
17:27	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Florian Weimer
17:21	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Robert Dewar
17:17	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Daniel Berlin
17:16	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Robert Dewar
17:09	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Mike Hearn
17:06	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Florian Weimer
17:01	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Daniel Berlin
17:01	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Andreas Schwab
16:48	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Robert Dewar
16:40	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Richard Kenner
16:27	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Richard Kenner
16:27	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Florian Weimer
16:23	Re: gcc-3.4-20041224 is now available	Thorsten Glaser
14:48	Re: discouraging register use	Joern RENNECKE
14:41	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Daniel Berlin
14:38	ia64 mulv8qi3 expander	Jan Beulich
14:18	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Robert Dewar
13:24	Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions	Frank Ch. Eigler
12:49	Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue	Richard Henderson
12:05	Adding new register	Petar Penchev
12:02	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Andreas Jaeger
11:53	Re: Question about instruction packing	Balaji S
11:47	Re: c++ stub generator	Ken Raeburn
11:45	Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue	Jan Beulich
11:45	Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?	Bill Northcott
11:11	Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue	Richard Henderson
10:53	another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue	Jan Beulich
10:43	Re: Question about instruction packing	Steven Bosscher
10:38	Re: c++ stub generator	Nick Ing-Simmons
10:32	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Ayal Zaks
09:45	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Florian Weimer
09:30	Re: new-new-ra thoughts	Steven Bosscher
08:48	Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:19	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Dean Kolosiek
08:14	GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05)	Mark Mitchell
07:00	about gcc on Solaris8	Vadim Karamov
05:55	Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug?	Bill Northcott
05:46	Re: Question about instruction packing	Balaji S
05:34	Re: discouraging register use	Richard Henderson
05:00	Re: discouraging register use	DJ Delorie
04:53	C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions	Raghu Annaluru
03:50	new-new-ra thoughts	Nathanael Nerode
03:40	new-new-ra thoughts	Nathanael Nerode
03:27	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
02:33	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Daniel Berlin
02:16	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Richard Kenner
02:14	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Daniel Berlin
02:05	Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada	Andrew Pinski
00:42	Re: isysroot and various headers	Daniel Jacobowitz
00:41	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:39	Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:18	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Jeffrey A Law
00:12	Re: RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule	Geoffrey Keating
00:12	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Geoffrey Keating

gcc archivedate index for January, 2005

gcc archive
date index for January, 2005

20:33	Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs	Richard Henderson
20:25	Having dg-skip-if on the branches?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:24	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Richard Henderson
20:22	Re: discouraging register use	DJ Delorie
20:13	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Sam Lauber
19:58	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Mark Mitchell
18:20	Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs	Paul Schlie
17:15	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
17:05	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
16:58	Re: ChangeLog rotated	Gerald Pfeifer
16:55	Re: ChangeLog rotated	Joseph S. Myers
16:48	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
16:40	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
15:24	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
14:11	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Robert Dewar
14:08	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Robert Dewar
13:50	Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression	Daniel Berlin
13:17	Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression	tbp
13:15	Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs	Giovanni Bajo
12:32	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Florian Weimer
12:26	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
12:08	Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option	Gerald Pfeifer
10:45	Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option	Volker Reichelt
10:33	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Dean Kolosiek
10:11	Re: SSE testcase failure	Anders Carlsson
10:05	Re: SSE testcase failure	Uros Bizjak
09:47	default_section_type_flags and SECTION_SMALL	Jan Beulich
09:30	Re: SSE testcase failure	Anders Carlsson
09:29	Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression	tbp
09:05	Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression	Uros Bizjak
08:19	Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression	tbp
07:53	Re: Question about instruction packing	Steven Bosscher
07:45	Re: SSE testcase failure	Luca Benini
07:34	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Arnaud Charlet
07:34	Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option	Andreas Jaeger
07:32	Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression	Uros Bizjak
07:21	Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Andreas Jaeger
07:20	Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option	Hao Qian
06:50	Question about instruction packing	Balaji S
06:46	gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression	tbp
05:53	Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64	Dean Kolosiek
05:33	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
02:49	Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete	Mark Mitchell
01:16	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Sam Lauber

23:22	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
22:53	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Richard Guenther
22:46	SSE testcase failure	Anders Carlsson
21:47	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
21:29	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Steven Bosscher
21:25	Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:09	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Sam Lauber
20:51	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Nathanael Nerode
18:48	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Matt Austern
18:43	Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets	Bj=F6rn=20Haase
18:25	Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline	Andreas Schwab
18:16	Re: philosophical argument / width of int for gcc targets	Bj=F6rn=20Haase
18:12	Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline	Mike Stump
18:07	gcc-4.0-20050102 is now available	gccadmin
17:54	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Mike Stump
17:49	Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets	Mike Stump
17:36	Re: Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5	Bradley Lucier
16:52	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
16:46	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
16:39	Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN	Giovanni Bajo
16:35	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Daniel Berlin
16:35	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
16:28	Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Paul Brook
15:27	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
15:14	MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs	Roger Sayle
14:50	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Richard Guenther
14:35	What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets	Bj=F6rn=20Haase
14:33	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
14:26	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Kai Henningsen
13:57	What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Bj=F6rn=20Haase
13:40	[C++] warn_synth considered obsolete	gcc
13:04	What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0	Steven Bosscher
12:35	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Kai Henningsen
10:59	Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:45	Re: Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5	Steven Bosscher
09:15	Re: Debugging with gdb	Russell Shaw
07:47	Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN	Richard Henderson
07:39	Re: Debugging with gdb	Russell Shaw
07:27	Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5	Bradley Lucier
07:12	Re: Debugging with gdb	Russell Shaw
05:03	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
03:54	Re: Debugging with gdb	Ian Lance Taylor
03:35	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Martin Dalecki
03:23	Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline	Timothy J . Wood
03:01	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
01:30	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
01:29	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:27	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	David Edelsohn
01:22	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
01:12	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Paul Schlie
01:09	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
00:53	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Giovanni Bajo
00:35	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Robert Dewar
00:29	Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:09	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Giovanni Bajo