This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Dammit, wrong patch. I meant this.
Yes Attached is a patch that should fix it. We weren't generating frame base in all the cases we could.
Please let me know if this doesn't fix all the cases, because if so, there is a bit more i can do.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, H. J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:00:32PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
It doesn't help tls_symbolic_operand at all.
Then i need you to determine where loc_descriptor is called with can_use_fbreg == 1 for the location list that you are referring to
I updated PR 19124 with a small testcase and the output from readelf. The questionable debug info is marked with `[without DW_AT_frame_base]'. Will it enough for you to debug it?
H.J.
Attachment:
forhj.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |