This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 06:29:22PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:1)Registers that _must_ hold addresses (pointers) _can_ hold integers as well.
Sorry, I don't quite get the wording here; I can't tell exactly what is the referent of "that" in the above sentence. I'm not sure if you mean
1) If it is true that registers that hold pointers can only be used
for pointers and not integers, there's absolutely....
This one.
So you would suggest to change the front-end, e.g. introducing a new tree operator and modifing the parser?Hmm, but wouldn't the potential workaround of defining Pmode to some mode
(other than SImode) that is not used by the machine ...
No. The problems start in the front end.
r~Thanks,
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |