This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: wrong-code regressions review

From: Bradley Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: "<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org> <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Bradley Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>, Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer dot com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:54:55 -0500
Subject: Re: wrong-code regressions review
References: <95C1438C-4E38-11D9-A170-003065BA681E@math.purdue.edu> <056701c4e2a7$bf87a450$f503030a@mimas> <278F7AF2-4E9F-11D9-8F62-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu>

On Dec 15, 2004, at 8:42 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

And I would try again since there was a fix recently with respect with
computed gotos.

It failed with this compiler yesterday:

[lucier@cohomology gambc40b11]$ ~/local/bin/gcc -v Reading specs from /home/lucier/local/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.0/specs Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/home/lucier/local/ --enable-languages=c --enable-checking=no Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.0 20041215 (experimental)

References:
- Re: wrong-code regressions review
  - From: Bradley Lucier
- Re: wrong-code regressions review
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: wrong-code regressions review
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]