This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: native gcc for vxworks

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, j_f at laposte dot net,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, list gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 20:00:03 -0500
Subject: Re: native gcc for vxworks
References: <41AF8607.6070800@laposte.net> <87oehcfivu.fsf@codesourcery.com> <1102345280.5107.57.camel@jfmorcillo.sdcgemenos.local> <41B4769E.3080602@codesourcery.com> <41B55331.1080506@adacore.com> <9846F6F9-3CC8-40BC-BA5A-2FA14B118587@apple.com>

Mike Stump wrote:

On Dec 6, 2004, at 10:52 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
I trust the small here is meant with a sense of irony, since this would
in practice be many person years of work I would guess.
No, it isn't that hard, probably take a few weeks.

cygwin is a lot of work, not because of gcc, but because of the 1000s of other software packages it compiles.


Well you are far more optimistic than I would be. After all even getting
VxWorks to be posix compatible is a major amount of work. Gteting a full
unix environment seems much harder to me.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: native gcc for vxworks
  - From: Mike Stump

References:
- native gcc for vxworks
  - From: jf
- Re: native gcc for vxworks
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: native gcc for vxworks
  - From: Jean-François Morcillo
- Re: native gcc for vxworks
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: native gcc for vxworks
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: native gcc for vxworks
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]