This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Size of basic types
- From: "Dave Korn" <dk at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Allan Sandfeld Jensen'" <linux at carewolf dot com>,<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:01:37 -0000
- Subject: RE: Size of basic types
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> Sent: 03 December 2004 08:38
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 22:04, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
> > So I changed OurInt to int instead of long. But then, I
> have problems
> > because we have overloaded methods with OurInt and OurBool,
> which were
> > different in 32bits mode (int and long) but are the same
> now in 64bits
> > (the 2 are int)...
> > Any idea how to resolve that?
> >
> You have use long where you should have used int, so:
> #define long int
>
> `Allan
<g> And what #define do you suggest for long long?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....