gcc archive
date index for December, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 28, 2004

23:04 A workaround for PR 19038 Mostafa Hagog

20:58 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041228)on MICO sources Karel Gardas

20:50 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch

20:09 sparc/sparc.c:502: error: initializer element is not constant Christian Joensson

19:44 Extra from email addresses and incoming bugzilla handling Daniel Berlin

18:49 Re: [Bug debug/19124] [4.0 regression] gcc generates incorrectdwarf2 debug info Daniel Berlin

18:01 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch

16:52 Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files? Paolo Bonzini

16:39 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Steven Bosscher

16:37 Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files? Andrew Pinski

16:33 may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files? Bob Gustafson

16:31 Re: [arm-gnu] how to add new command line option for arm gcc Mark Mitchell

15:05 Re: [ECOS] arm-elf-g++ ver3.2.1 problem Gary Thomas

14:26 arm-elf-g++ ver3.2.1 problem Ryos Suzuki

12:06 Re: Problems with vector definition Oscar Fuentes

11:10 Problems with vector definition Juan Roberto Jiménez Pérez

11:06 Multilib test problems with libgcc_s in gfortran, libstdc++ tests Andreas Jaeger

08:44 Re: Please Help Me with Dev-C++ Sisyphus

08:18 make check problems on multilib systems in libstdc++ Andreas Jaeger

04:13 Please Help Me with Dev-C++ Wes Ripley

04:08 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev

04:07 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Giovanni Bajo

04:05 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Denis Zaitsev

03:57 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Andrew Pinski

03:54 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Denis Zaitsev

03:50 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Andrew Pinski

03:44 [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Denis Zaitsev

00:17 Re: RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule Andrew Pinski

00:06 RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule Kelley Cook

December 26, 2004

21:26 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch

18:06 gcc-4.0-20041226 is now available gccadmin

11:14 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Toon Moene

01:13 Re: Help with constraint for single register Richard Henderson

01:01 Re: Help with constraint for single register Daniel Jacobowitz

00:45 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch

December 25, 2004

21:06 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paolo Carlini

20:59 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Schlie

17:32 G++ enums 'underlying type' Paolo Carlini

17:14 Data dependence dumps Flavio _

15:20 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Richard Stallman

14:51 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Gerald Pfeifer

11:53 Re: Help with constraint for single register0 Ulrich Weigand

04:52 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Sam Lauber

04:28 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch

01:55 Re: Help with constraint for single register Ian Lance Taylor

December 24, 2004

23:20 gcc-3.4-20041224 is now available gccadmin

18:49 Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch

16:32 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Giovanni Bajo

15:15 Re: Bug in int_fits_type_p Olivier Hainque

14:54 Re: Bug in int_fits_type_p Richard Kenner

13:25 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Steven Bosscher

11:30 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Roger Sayle

08:59 PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Mostafa Hagog

05:27 Bug in int_fits_type_p Roger Sayle

03:50 Re: comment error Ben Elliston

03:44 Re: gcc command-line option parsing doc Ben Elliston

03:07 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor

02:32 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch

00:26 Re: GTY and const Marc Espie

00:25 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ulrich Weigand

December 23, 2004

23:23 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch

23:10 RE: Help with define_insn and constraints Dave Korn

23:00 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Richard Henderson

22:38 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Richard Henderson

22:28 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou

22:15 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez

22:09 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou

21:45 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez

21:37 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor

21:36 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor

21:34 RE: Help with define_insn and constraints Dave Korn

21:21 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch

21:17 Re: RFC (proposed fix for PR18916) Richard Henderson

21:04 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Richard Henderson

20:55 RE: query reg. gcc Dave Korn

20:33 Re: query reg. gcc Mike Stump

20:30 Re: query reg. gcc Mike Stump

20:28 assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez

20:09 Re: query reg. gcc Mike Stump

20:04 RE: query reg. gcc Dave Korn

19:56 Re: GTY and const Robert Dewar

19:42 FAMILY & HOME PROTECTION Correction Bob

19:06 RFC (proposed fix for PR18916) Fariborz Jahanian

18:39 Re: query reg. gcc Ian Lance Taylor

18:29 Re: query reg. gcc Shachindra Sharma

17:31 Re: SMS improvements branch Devang Patel

17:13 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor

17:09 RE: how to fix Heisenbug Dave Korn

17:01 Re: Re: GTY and const Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3

16:59 Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch

15:14 Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Jan Hubicka

14:40 Re: SMS improvements branch Mostafa Hagog

13:12 Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Uros Bizjak

12:00 Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Jan Hubicka

11:19 FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Uros Bizjak

09:18 comment error Mathieu Lacage

08:59 bad include search order in top level configure.in Jan Beulich

08:56 gcc command-line option parsing doc Mathieu Lacage

05:39 Re: Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass? Ben Elliston

05:30 Re: GTY and const Daniel Berlin

05:15 Re: query reg. gcc Zack Weinberg

05:07 Re: GTY and const Zack Weinberg

04:40 Re: query reg. gcc Dale Johannesen

04:32 Re: Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error? Robert Baruch

04:12 Re: query reg. gcc Deepak Soi

03:43 Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? Daniel Jacobowitz

01:23 Re: GTY and const Geoff Keating

01:18 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Ian Lance Taylor

01:00 Re: Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error? Richard Henderson

00:49 broken build on powerpc64-linux-gnu Janis Johnson

00:23 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Paul Brook

00:11 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Mike Stump

00:05 Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error? Robert Baruch

December 22, 2004

23:50 Re: Help with new port: infinite looping in reload Robert Baruch

23:44 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Sam Lauber

23:38 Re: New Makefile targets? Ben Elliston

23:24 gcc-3.3-20041222 is now available gccadmin

23:11 Re: GTY and const Zack Weinberg

23:06 Re: GTY and const Daniel Berlin

22:20 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev

22:05 Re: Bootstrap failure due to your latest change Andrew Pinski

22:03 Bootstrap failure due to your latest change Richard Kenner

20:41 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Mike Stump

20:13 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev

20:07 Re: performing updates from gcc cvs and building Mike Stump

19:56 [Fwd: Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?] Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3

19:47 Re: Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger

19:45 Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger

19:25 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Devang Patel

18:56 Re: type gimplification, continued Richard Kenner

18:54 Re: type gimplification, continued Richard Kenner

18:42 Re: type gimplification, continued Andrew Pinski

18:25 Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? H. J. Lu

18:20 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Richard Guenther

18:09 Re: type gimplification, continued Alexandre Oliva

17:59 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Dorit Naishlos

17:54 Re: [Fwd: Re: Popping Registers] Robert Dewar

17:28 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Bobby McNulty

17:03 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Mark Mitchell

17:03 Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Sam Lauber

16:16 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Joe Buck

16:02 Re: query reg. gcc Ian Lance Taylor

15:58 Re: performing updates from gcc cvs and building Ian Lance Taylor

15:55 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful peter.kourzanov

15:53 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Ian Lance Taylor

15:42 Re: Help with new port: infinite looping in reload Ian Lance Taylor

14:55 query reg. gcc Deepak Soi

14:50 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Paul Koning

14:39 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Eric Botcazou

14:18 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Kevin Puetz

13:57 performing updates from gcc cvs and building Mathieu Lacage

13:02 .bss section and uninitialised variables Gisle Grimen

12:28 Re: type gimplification, continued Richard Kenner

11:09 Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? Nick Clifton

11:00 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Steven Bosscher

08:42 type gimplification, continued Richard Henderson

06:08 Re: RFA: how to fix Heisenbug Jeffrey A Law

04:39 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Andrew Pinski

04:34 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev

04:06 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Andrew Pinski

03:48 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 James A. Morrison

03:42 [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev

03:36 Help with new port: infinite looping in reload Robert Baruch

03:24 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Mark Mitchell

02:55 Denied post to the www mailing list owner-www

01:28 New Makefile targets? Sam Lauber

01:16 Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? H. J. Lu

December 19, 2004

23:26 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand

23:26 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand

23:22 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak

23:12 Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass? Björn Haase

23:08 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand

23:08 Modifing Gcc Sridat Kota

20:51 Re: Q about REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P et al Richard Henderson

20:35 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Aaron W. LaFramboise

20:05 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Pjotr Kourzanov

18:59 Q about REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P et al Robert Baruch

18:23 gcc-4.0-20041219 is now available gccadmin

17:31 RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Gary Funck

12:27 Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Arnd Bergmann

10:37 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Robert Dewar

08:23 Re: x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Richard Henderson

07:37 Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Paul Schlie

03:42 PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty H. J. Lu

02:40 Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Jan Hubicka

00:56 RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Joseph S. Myers

00:20 Re: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Giovanni Bajo

00:17 Re: 3.4.3 problem with fix for PR/17384 Richard Henderson

00:14 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Richard Henderson

23:25	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Richard Henderson
23:20	gcc-3.4-20041231 is now available	gccadmin
22:03	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
21:57	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin
21:54	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
21:50	Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations	Daniel Berlin
21:50	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
21:14	-funsafe-loop-optimizations	Zdenek Dvorak
20:16	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin
20:15	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
20:11	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
20:09	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin
20:09	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin
20:08	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin
19:59	Re: bug	Daniel Jacobowitz
19:57	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
19:26	Re: bug	Ian Lance Taylor
19:09	Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline	Devang Patel
19:04	bug	Najib Bakari
19:03	Gdb complaints Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers	H. J. Lu
18:44	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
17:21	Re: rtl semantics	Russell Shaw
17:00	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin
16:38	Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
16:14	Re: rtl semantics	Ian Lance Taylor
15:55	Re: rtl semantics	Russell Shaw
15:50	Re: gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ????	James A. Morrison
15:31	Re: rtl semantics	Ian Lance Taylor
15:26	rtl semantics	Russell Shaw
14:44	Re: discouraging register use	Ian Lance Taylor
12:05	Re: gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ????	Andreas Schwab
08:32	Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline	Timothy J . Wood
06:41	gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ????	Dean Kolosiek
06:21	Re: discouraging register use	Richard Henderson
04:52	Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline	Andrew Pinski
03:52	__APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline	Timothy J . Wood
03:28	Re: discouraging register use	Ian Lance Taylor
02:29	Re: discouraging register use	DJ Delorie
02:22	RE: discouraging register use	Dave Korn
01:10	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Robert Dewar
00:56	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Steven Bosscher
00:56	Re: discouraging register use	DJ Delorie
00:52	Re: discouraging register use	Steven Bosscher
00:35	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin

23:54	discouraging register use	DJ Delorie
22:03	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Joe Buck
21:05	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
21:01	Guidance on address expression optimization in CSE	HutchinsonAndy
20:56	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Berlin
20:52	Gdb generates DW_OP_fbreg in location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
20:28	Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:23	Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base	H. J. Lu
20:07	Re: GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:02	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Mike Hearn
19:56	Re: GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists	H. J. Lu
19:36	Re: GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists	H. J. Lu
19:35	Re: A workaround for PR 19038	Mostafa Hagog
19:24	GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists	H. J. Lu
18:45	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Matt Austern
18:14	Re: Gcc mirrors checking	Luca Benini
17:56	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Mark Mitchell
16:17	Re: Gcc mirrors checking	Luca Benini
15:26	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Robert Dewar
15:20	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Roger Sayle
14:41	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:34	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Robert Dewar
14:28	Re: Gcc mirrors checking	Gerald Pfeifer
14:20	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Robert Dewar
13:47	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:46	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Steven Bosscher
13:23	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:18	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Robert Dewar
13:03	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Mike Hearn
12:33	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Robert Dewar
12:21	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Mike Hearn
08:58	Re: Hacker guide?	Steven Bosscher
08:35	Hacker guide?	vivek
03:52	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paul Schlie
02:53	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Stefan Strasser
02:35	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Robert Dewar
02:11	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Stefan Strasser
01:49	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:47	Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Robert Dewar
01:45	Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage	Roger Sayle
01:40	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paolo Carlini
01:33	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:29	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:43	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Robert Dewar
00:30	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Pjotr Kourzanov
00:05	Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Jeffrey A Law

23:39	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ken Raeburn
23:32	Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Steven Bosscher
23:21	gcc-3.3-20041229 is now available	gccadmin
23:07	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
22:48	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Jakub Jelinek
22:16	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paul Schlie
22:16	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paul Schlie
22:12	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:11	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:05	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:03	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Marc Espie
21:56	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paolo Carlini
21:54	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paul Brook
21:52	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paolo Carlini
21:45	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paul Schlie
20:47	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:32	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Toon Moene
20:22	Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Jeffrey A Law
19:52	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paul Schlie
19:40	Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Steven Bosscher
19:30	Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Jeffrey A Law
19:30	Re: A workaround for PR 19038	Jeffrey A Law
18:14	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:08	Gcc mirrors checking	Luca Benini
16:12	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
16:06	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
15:00	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Jakub Jelinek
14:46	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
14:07	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Sebastian Pop
14:07	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Sebastian Pop
08:27	Re: sparc/sparc.c:502: error: initializer element is not constant	Christian Joensson
07:14	Re: sparc/sparc.c:502: error: initializer element is not constant	Christian Joensson
06:53	How to enable instruction scheduling?	Balaji S
04:58	Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files?	Bob Gustafson

23:04	A workaround for PR 19038	Mostafa Hagog
20:58	Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041228)on MICO sources	Karel Gardas
20:50	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
20:09	sparc/sparc.c:502: error: initializer element is not constant	Christian Joensson
19:44	Extra from email addresses and incoming bugzilla handling	Daniel Berlin
18:49	Re: [Bug debug/19124] [4.0 regression] gcc generates incorrectdwarf2 debug info	Daniel Berlin
18:01	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
16:52	Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files?	Paolo Bonzini
16:39	Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Steven Bosscher
16:37	Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files?	Andrew Pinski
16:33	may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files?	Bob Gustafson
16:31	Re: [arm-gnu] how to add new command line option for arm gcc	Mark Mitchell
15:05	Re: [ECOS] arm-elf-g++ ver3.2.1 problem	Gary Thomas
14:26	arm-elf-g++ ver3.2.1 problem	Ryos Suzuki
12:06	Re: Problems with vector definition	Oscar Fuentes
11:10	Problems with vector definition	Juan Roberto Jiménez Pérez
11:06	Multilib test problems with libgcc_s in gfortran, libstdc++ tests	Andreas Jaeger
08:44	Re: Please Help Me with Dev-C++	Sisyphus
08:18	make check problems on multilib systems in libstdc++	Andreas Jaeger
04:13	Please Help Me with Dev-C++	Wes Ripley
04:08	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Denis Zaitsev
04:07	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour	Giovanni Bajo
04:05	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour	Denis Zaitsev
03:57	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour	Andrew Pinski
03:54	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour	Denis Zaitsev
03:50	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour	Andrew Pinski
03:44	[BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour	Denis Zaitsev
00:17	Re: RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule	Andrew Pinski
00:06	RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule	Kelley Cook

22:57	Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Jeffrey A Law
21:41	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
21:40	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
21:36	Re: Help with constraint for single register	E. Weddington
21:25	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
21:14	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Denis Zaitsev
17:43	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:40	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:07	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Giovanni Bajo
16:03	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
16:01	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Richard Kenner
15:50	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
15:43	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
15:40	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Richard Kenner
15:37	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
15:20	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Richard Kenner
15:18	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Florian Weimer
15:09	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Richard Kenner
14:53	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
14:49	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
14:29	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Richard Kenner
14:21	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Florian Weimer
14:11	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Andrew Pinski
14:05	Re: GCC 3.4.3 and fiend decleration.	Andrew Pinski
14:04	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
13:56	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Florian Weimer
13:52	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Florian Weimer
13:40	GCC 3.4.3 and fiend decleration.	Georg Grabler
13:31	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
13:00	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Giovanni Bajo
12:13	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Richard Guenther
11:39	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Robert Dewar
11:01	Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Richard Guenther
07:57	Wrong RTL instruction deleted	Uros Bizjak
01:38	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
00:26	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
00:01	Emmanuelle EG GUITTON FRAGNAUD/CCIB est absent(e).	EGUITTONFRAGNAUD

21:26	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
18:06	gcc-4.0-20041226 is now available	gccadmin
11:14	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Toon Moene
01:13	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Richard Henderson
01:01	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Daniel Jacobowitz
00:45	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch

21:06	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paolo Carlini
20:59	Re: G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paul Schlie
17:32	G++ enums 'underlying type'	Paolo Carlini
17:14	Data dependence dumps	Flavio _
15:20	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Richard Stallman
14:51	[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21)	Gerald Pfeifer
11:53	Re: Help with constraint for single register0	Ulrich Weigand
04:52	Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Sam Lauber
04:28	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
01:55	Re: Help with constraint for single register	Ian Lance Taylor

23:20	gcc-3.4-20041224 is now available	gccadmin
18:49	Help with constraint for single register	Robert Baruch
16:32	Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Giovanni Bajo
15:15	Re: Bug in int_fits_type_p	Olivier Hainque
14:54	Re: Bug in int_fits_type_p	Richard Kenner
13:25	Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Steven Bosscher
11:30	Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Roger Sayle
08:59	PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int	Mostafa Hagog
05:27	Bug in int_fits_type_p	Roger Sayle
03:50	Re: comment error	Ben Elliston
03:44	Re: gcc command-line option parsing doc	Ben Elliston
03:07	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Ian Lance Taylor
02:32	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Robert Baruch
00:26	Re: GTY and const	Marc Espie
00:25	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Ulrich Weigand

23:23	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Robert Baruch
23:10	RE: Help with define_insn and constraints	Dave Korn
23:00	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Richard Henderson
22:38	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Richard Henderson
22:28	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Eric Botcazou
22:15	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Aldy Hernandez
22:09	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Eric Botcazou
21:45	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Aldy Hernandez
21:37	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Ian Lance Taylor
21:36	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Ian Lance Taylor
21:34	RE: Help with define_insn and constraints	Dave Korn
21:21	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Robert Baruch
21:17	Re: RFC (proposed fix for PR18916)	Richard Henderson
21:04	Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Richard Henderson
20:55	RE: query reg. gcc	Dave Korn
20:33	Re: query reg. gcc	Mike Stump
20:30	Re: query reg. gcc	Mike Stump
20:28	assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels	Aldy Hernandez
20:09	Re: query reg. gcc	Mike Stump
20:04	RE: query reg. gcc	Dave Korn
19:56	Re: GTY and const	Robert Dewar
19:42	FAMILY & HOME PROTECTION Correction	Bob
19:06	RFC (proposed fix for PR18916)	Fariborz Jahanian
18:39	Re: query reg. gcc	Ian Lance Taylor
18:29	Re: query reg. gcc	Shachindra Sharma
17:31	Re: SMS improvements branch	Devang Patel
17:13	Re: Help with define_insn and constraints	Ian Lance Taylor
17:09	RE: how to fix Heisenbug	Dave Korn
17:01	Re: Re: GTY and const	Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
16:59	Help with define_insn and constraints	Robert Baruch
15:14	Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH	Jan Hubicka
14:40	Re: SMS improvements branch	Mostafa Hagog
13:12	Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH	Uros Bizjak
12:00	Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH	Jan Hubicka
11:19	FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH	Uros Bizjak
09:18	comment error	Mathieu Lacage
08:59	bad include search order in top level configure.in	Jan Beulich
08:56	gcc command-line option parsing doc	Mathieu Lacage
05:39	Re: Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass?	Ben Elliston
05:30	Re: GTY and const	Daniel Berlin
05:15	Re: query reg. gcc	Zack Weinberg
05:07	Re: GTY and const	Zack Weinberg
04:40	Re: query reg. gcc	Dale Johannesen
04:32	Re: Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error?	Robert Baruch
04:12	Re: query reg. gcc	Deepak Soi
03:43	Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug?	Daniel Jacobowitz
01:23	Re: GTY and const	Geoff Keating
01:18	Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Ian Lance Taylor
01:00	Re: Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error?	Richard Henderson
00:49	broken build on powerpc64-linux-gnu	Janis Johnson
00:23	Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Paul Brook
00:11	Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Mike Stump
00:05	Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error?	Robert Baruch

23:50	Re: Help with new port: infinite looping in reload	Robert Baruch
23:44	Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Sam Lauber
23:38	Re: New Makefile targets?	Ben Elliston
23:24	gcc-3.3-20041222 is now available	gccadmin
23:11	Re: GTY and const	Zack Weinberg
23:06	Re: GTY and const	Daniel Berlin
22:20	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Denis Zaitsev
22:05	Re: Bootstrap failure due to your latest change	Andrew Pinski
22:03	Bootstrap failure due to your latest change	Richard Kenner
20:41	Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Mike Stump
20:13	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Denis Zaitsev
20:07	Re: performing updates from gcc cvs and building	Mike Stump
19:56	[Fwd: Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?]	Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
19:47	Re: Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu	Andreas Jaeger
19:45	Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu	Andreas Jaeger
19:25	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Devang Patel
18:56	Re: type gimplification, continued	Richard Kenner
18:54	Re: type gimplification, continued	Richard Kenner
18:42	Re: type gimplification, continued	Andrew Pinski
18:25	Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug?	H. J. Lu
18:20	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Richard Guenther
18:09	Re: type gimplification, continued	Alexandre Oliva
17:59	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Dorit Naishlos
17:54	Re: [Fwd: Re: Popping Registers]	Robert Dewar
17:28	Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Bobby McNulty
17:03	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21)	Mark Mitchell
17:03	Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?	Sam Lauber
16:16	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21)	Joe Buck
16:02	Re: query reg. gcc	Ian Lance Taylor
15:58	Re: performing updates from gcc cvs and building	Ian Lance Taylor
15:55	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	peter.kourzanov
15:53	Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables	Ian Lance Taylor
15:42	Re: Help with new port: infinite looping in reload	Ian Lance Taylor
14:55	query reg. gcc	Deepak Soi
14:50	Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables	Paul Koning
14:39	Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables	Eric Botcazou
14:18	Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables	Kevin Puetz
13:57	performing updates from gcc cvs and building	Mathieu Lacage
13:02	.bss section and uninitialised variables	Gisle Grimen
12:28	Re: type gimplification, continued	Richard Kenner
11:09	Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug?	Nick Clifton
11:00	Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21)	Steven Bosscher
08:42	type gimplification, continued	Richard Henderson
06:08	Re: RFA: how to fix Heisenbug	Jeffrey A Law
04:39	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Andrew Pinski
04:34	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Denis Zaitsev
04:06	Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Andrew Pinski
03:48	Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24	James A. Morrison
03:42	[BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++	Denis Zaitsev
03:36	Help with new port: infinite looping in reload	Robert Baruch
03:24	GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21)	Mark Mitchell
02:55	Denied post to the www mailing list	owner-www
01:28	New Makefile targets?	Sam Lauber
01:16	Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug?	H. J. Lu

23:47	RFA: how to fix Heisenbug	Dale Johannesen
23:39	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
23:39	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
22:42	Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24	Eric Botcazou
22:00	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizerquestions	Paul Schlie
21:42	Revision to 4.0 release critieria: add arm-none-elf	Mark Mitchell
20:56	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
19:19	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
19:18	[Fwd: Re: Popping Registers]	Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
19:18	[Fwd: Re: gimplify_parameters]	Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
19:01	Re: GTY and const	Zack Weinberg
18:26	Re: GTY and const	Geoffrey Keating
18:16	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
18:14	Re: RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary))	Jakub Jelinek
18:03	Re: Popping registers	Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
18:00	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
17:48	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
17:48	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
17:43	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
17:13	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizerquestions	Paul Schlie
16:56	Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24	Eric Botcazou
16:27	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
16:00	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
15:50	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
15:11	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
15:04	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
15:03	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
14:51	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
14:46	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
14:10	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
13:40	FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !!	Manish Shah
13:25	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
13:19	Re: FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !!	jf
13:05	Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24	Richard Kenner
12:50	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
12:41	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
12:35	Re: RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary))	Richard Henderson
10:04	Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24	Eric Botcazou
09:36	Re: FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !!	jf
09:25	FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !!	Manish Shah
08:11	Re: fix c/18282, for 4.0	Eric Botcazou
07:45	Re: RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary))	Andreas Jaeger
07:33	RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary))	Uros Bizjak
07:23	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Marcus Meissner
05:55	Re: Popping registers	Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:47	Re: Popping registers	Peter Barada
05:02	Re: Crossgcc FAQ. In perpetual maintenance.	Ranjit Mathew
03:14	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
03:07	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
02:45	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
02:41	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
02:40	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
02:39	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
02:26	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
02:25	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
02:21	Re: Popping registers	Sam Lauber
02:20	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner
02:14	RE: Popping registers	Dave Korn
02:04	Re: Popping registers	Zack Weinberg
02:00	RE: Popping registers	Dave Korn
01:58	Re: Popping registers	Peter Barada
01:48	Re: Popping registers	Sam Lauber
01:47	RE: Popping registers	Dave Korn
01:43	Re: gimplify_parameters	Richard Henderson
01:26	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Andrew Pinski
01:23	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Mike Stump
01:23	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Joe Buck
01:09	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Joe Buck
00:56	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Joseph S. Myers
00:52	Re: Popping registers	Richard Henderson
00:46	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Mike Stump
00:45	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Stefan Strasser
00:42	Re: gcc 4.0 libgcc_eh static linking	Richard Henderson
00:16	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Paul Schlie
00:08	gimplify_parameters	Richard Kenner

23:18	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:16	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Denis Zaitsev
23:11	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:52	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
22:51	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Andrew Pinski
22:48	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Andrew Pinski
22:47	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Joe Buck
22:47	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Denis Zaitsev
22:44	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Joe Buck
22:37	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Pjotr Kourzanov
22:36	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Andrew Pinski
22:33	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Andrew Pinski
22:31	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Eric Botcazou
22:27	Re: Crossgcc FAQ. In perpetual maintenance.	E. Weddington
22:26	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Denis Zaitsev
22:23	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:20	Crossgcc FAQ. In perpetual maintenance.	Tiriac, Steve
22:17	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:08	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Denis Zaitsev
22:04	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Andrew Pinski
22:02	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Tom Tromey
21:54	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Andrew Pinski
21:50	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Zack Weinberg
21:48	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Denis Zaitsev
21:39	Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Andrew Pinski
21:37	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Ian Lance Taylor
21:37	Re: Compiling gnat with a different gcc	Luke A. Guest
21:36	[PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure	Denis Zaitsev
21:23	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:02	Re: Compiling gnat with a different gcc	Florian Weimer
20:59	The Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.2 is released	H. J. Lu
20:55	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Andrew Pinski
20:47	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Paul Schlie
20:46	Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty	Alexandre Oliva
20:24	Re: gcc pragma pack on hpux	Eric Frias
20:23	Popping registers	Sam Lauber
20:14	Compiling gnat with a different gcc	Luke A. Guest
19:58	Re: Warning for different pointer signedness	Andrew Pinski
19:56	Warning for different pointer signedness	Paul Schlie
18:45	Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty	H. J. Lu
18:41	Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty	Andrew Pinski
18:39	Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty	H. J. Lu
17:37	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question)	Joe Buck
17:35	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Joe Buck
17:28	Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty	Alexandre Oliva
17:27	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Joe Buck
16:06	Re: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !!	jf
15:40	Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !!	Manish Shah
15:16	Warning for different pointer signedness	Giovanni Bajo
14:48	The problem compiling s-fileio.adb	Richard Kenner
14:08	Re: CVS Head: libada build fails	Richard Kenner
13:55	Re: CVS Head: libada build fails	Graham Stott
13:44	Re: CVS Head: libada build fails	Eric Botcazou
13:26	Re: CVS Head: libada build fails	Richard Kenner
13:23	Re: CVS Head: libada build fails	Richard Kenner
12:26	gcc 4.0 libgcc_eh static linking	Roland Lengfeldner
09:02	Re: CVS Head: libada build fails	Andreas Jaeger
08:51	Re: CVS Head: libada build fails	Christian Joensson
08:47	CVS Head: libada build fails	Andreas Jaeger
08:31	Compiling for FreeBSD	DarkPhoton
03:48	Re: cp tree question	Stefan Strasser
02:40	Paradoxical subregs and !INSN_SCHEDULING. Why?	Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:10	Re: New option?	Sam Lauber
01:52	Re: Fix longstanding bugzilla anoyance	Kelley Cook
01:22	Fix longstanding bugzilla anoyance	Daniel Berlin
01:11	Re: Modifing Gcc	Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:57	Re: Modifing Gcc	Ben Elliston
00:47	Re: New option?	Ben Elliston
00:26	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Daniel Berlin

23:26	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
23:26	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
23:22	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Zdenek Dvorak
23:12	Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass?	Björn Haase
23:08	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Ulrich Weigand
23:08	Modifing Gcc	Sridat Kota
20:51	Re: Q about REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P et al	Richard Henderson
20:35	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Aaron W. LaFramboise
20:05	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Pjotr Kourzanov
18:59	Q about REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P et al	Robert Baruch
18:23	gcc-4.0-20041219 is now available	gccadmin
17:31	RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans?	Gary Funck
12:27	Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types	Arnd Bergmann
10:37	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Robert Dewar
08:23	Re: x86-64 abi, regarding vector types	Richard Henderson
07:37	Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types	Paul Schlie
03:42	PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty	H. J. Lu
02:40	Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types	Jan Hubicka
00:56	RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans?	Joseph S. Myers
00:20	Re: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans?	Giovanni Bajo
00:17	Re: 3.4.3 problem with fix for PR/17384	Richard Henderson
00:14	Re: New target for Coldfire v4e?	Richard Henderson

23:03	x86-64 abi, regarding vector types	Richard Henderson
20:52	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Stefan Strasser
17:46	New option?	Sam Lauber
16:23	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:14	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Paul Brook
15:12	Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration?	Bobby McNulty
15:01	Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:35	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:33	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question)	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:32	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question)	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:28	Re: cp tree question	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:08	Re: [gpc] GCC integration?	Florian Weimer
10:54	Re: [gpc] GCC integration?	Marc Espie
10:18	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful	Zack Weinberg
09:54	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question)	Stefan Strasser
09:39	Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question)	Nathan Sidwell
09:33	-fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp treequestion)	Zack Weinberg
08:32	Re: Danny Smith to become maintainer of our Windows ports	Patrick McFarland
07:27	cp tree question	Stefan Strasser
03:39	List of regressions that are assigned and not have moved	Andrew Pinski
03:17	Re: C++ ABI and ILP64	Zack Weinberg
02:42	Re: C++ ABI and ILP64	Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
02:29	RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans?	Gary Funck
01:26	Re: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans?	Giovanni Bajo
01:11	Re: genrecog: match_code "bug"?	Zack Weinberg
01:10	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Daniel Berlin
00:49	Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration?	Joseph S. Myers
00:24	genrecog: match_code "bug"?	DJ Delorie
00:16	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	Steven Bosscher
00:07	Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions	David Edelsohn

23:46	Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3	David Wuertele
23:16	Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3	Joe Buck
23:07	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Zdenek Dvorak
23:04	gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3	David Wuertele
22:21	RE: Need Help Building gcc on tru64 v5.1b	Hogan, Audrey M.
22:01	Re: gcc pragma pack on hpux	John David Anglin
21:18	Re: mem model defines for various platforms	Kai Henningsen
20:40	PR 18501. Before I mark it WONTFIX.	Diego Novillo
20:03	Re: C++ ABI and ILP64	Zack Weinberg
19:18	RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Dave Korn
19:00	Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Richard Henderson
18:44	RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Dave Korn
18:33	RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Dave Korn
18:31	RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Dave Korn
18:19	Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000	Peter Barada
18:14	Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Richard Henderson
18:13	Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Laura Tosoratto
17:56	Re: C++ ABI and ILP64	Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
17:45	Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000	Pascal Chaperon
17:16	Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000	Peter Barada
17:09	Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000	Pascal Chaperon
17:04	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Richard Guenther
16:56	Re: C++ ABI and ILP64	Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
16:47	RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Dave Korn
16:45	Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000	Ian Lance Taylor
16:45	RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Dave Korn
16:40	Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Richard Earnshaw
16:33	Different multiply operator for pointers and integers	Laura Tosoratto
16:29	Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000	Pascal Chaperon
16:10	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Diego Novillo
16:09	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Richard Guenther
16:06	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	David Edelsohn
16:04	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Richard Guenther
16:01	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Diego Novillo
15:58	Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Richard Guenther
15:57	Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional?	Richard Guenther
14:14	RE: [RFC] av

gcc archivedate index for December, 2004

gcc archive
date index for December, 2004