This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> writes:
2) Put __eprintf back into the shared libgcc, as an exported symbol, for all !inhibit_libc targets, so that fixincludes can rely on its being there. (If we instead use __assert, then __eprintf will remain a static-library-only backward compatibility symbol.)
Is this really necessary? I'd rather have __eprintf linked into only those apps that need it.
Right now, any shared library that uses assert will fail to link. _Something_ has to be done. I'm open to alternative suggestions.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |