gcc archive
date index for November, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2004
22:49 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Jeffrey A Law
22:48 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Richard Henderson
22:47 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Richard Henderson
22:19 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Gerald Pfeifer
21:21 gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Zbigniew Łuszpiński
20:57 Re: INT_MIN % -1 Paul Schlie
20:26 Re: Error -j2 building gcc cvs trunk with Ada Laurent GUERBY
19:44 Re: new contribution: GSA converter Daniel Berlin
19:17 Re: new contribution: GSA converter Diego Novillo
18:49 Re: Gcc mirros check Joe Buck
18:37 Re: Gcc mirros check Gerald Pfeifer
18:19 Re: A lot of gfortran failures on sparc-linux and sparc64-linux... Eric Botcazou
18:16 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Andrew Haley
18:11 Re: ./libgcc_s.so.1 => not found, mainline broken?!? Paolo Carlini
18:11 A lot of gfortran failures on sparc-linux and sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
18:10 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Geert Bosch
18:09 Re: ./libgcc_s.so.1 => not found, mainline broken?!? Eric Botcazou
18:07 Re: ./libgcc_s.so.1 => not found, mainline broken?!? Paolo Carlini
18:03 Re: ./libgcc_s.so.1 => not found, mainline broken?!? Christian Joensson
17:50 ./libgcc_s.so.1 => not found, mainline broken?!? Paolo Carlini
16:25 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Jeffrey A Law
16:23 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Andrew Haley
16:20 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Jeffrey A Law
16:09 tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Andrew Haley
15:12 new contribution: GSA converter Manuel Arenaz
15:05 Re: Useless assembly Robert Dewar
15:04 gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Zbigniew Łuszpiński
14:53 Error in verify_ssa with loop-iv Richard Kenner
14:51 RE: FTP server down? Dave Korn
14:39 FTP server down? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
14:12 Error -j2 building gcc cvs trunk with Ada Christian Joensson
13:55 Re: Reducing JUMPs and using conditional exec Sami Khawam
13:43 RE: Should -Os imply -shared-libgcc? Dave Korn
13:43 RE: Useless assembly Dave Korn
07:02 Re: Test failure in libgcj on mainline Ranjit Mathew
06:48 Re: Inefficient uses of JUMP_P Kazu Hirata
05:57 Re: I am soon to be ... Aaron W. LaFramboise
04:36 Re: INT_MIN % -1 Robert Dewar
04:33 Re: Inefficient uses of JUMP_P Richard Henderson
04:25 Re: Uberbaum fails to build for --target=m68k-elf Phil Edwards
04:23 Re: Useless assembly Robert Dewar
03:24 Inefficient uses of JUMP_P Kazu Hirata
03:12 Re: INT_MIN % -1 Paul Schlie
02:58 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Paul Schlie
02:56 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Dan Kegel
02:45 Re: Useless assembly Sam Lauber
01:50 Re: How to test for duplicate error messages Giovanni Bajo
00:45 Re: Uberbaum fails to build for --target=m68k-elf Daniel Jacobowitz
00:24 Uberbaum fails to build for --target=m68k-elf Peter Barada
00:22 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Andreas Schwab
00:15 Re: INT_MIN % -1 Andreas Schwab

November 29, 2004
23:54 Re: INT_MIN % -1 David Daney
23:49 Libffi header problem Bill Northcott
23:48 Re: Mainline in regression-fix only mode Mark Mitchell
23:38 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Richard Henderson
23:27 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Paul Schlie
22:57 Re: Mainline in regression-fix only mode Toon Moene
21:59 INT_MIN % -1 Morten Welinder
21:47 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Phil Edwards
21:42 Re: Howto dump syntax tree of erroneous program? Phil Edwards
21:21 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Paul Brook
21:15 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Phil Edwards
20:33 Re: dg-skip-if usage problem Janis Johnson
20:32 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Devang Patel
20:20 Re: Should -Os imply -shared-libgcc? Paul Koning
20:14 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Jeffrey A Law
20:06 Re: dg-skip-if usage problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:05 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Steven Bosscher
20:04 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Richard Kenner
19:59 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Devang Patel
19:54 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041126)on MICO sources Karel Gardas
19:54 Re: Mainline in regression-fix only mode Mark Mitchell
19:46 Should -Os imply -shared-libgcc? Ian Lance Taylor
19:30 Re: Reducing JUMPs and using conditional exec based on if_then_else Sami Khawam
19:19 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dave Korn
19:17 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dave Korn
19:15 Re: large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" Joe Buck
19:09 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Chris Jefferson
18:57 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dale Johannesen
18:53 Re: large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" David Mosberger
18:52 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Andrew Haley
18:46 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Matt Austern
18:35 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dave Korn
18:35 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dave Korn
18:29 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dave Korn
18:10 Re: I am soon to be ... Andrew Walrond
18:09 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Peter Barada
18:06 Re: dg-skip-if usage problem Janis Johnson
18:05 Re: Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Andrew Walrond
17:59 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Joe Buck
17:46 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Joe Buck
17:38 Re: To gcc steering committee Joe Buck
17:26 Re: Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Joe Buck
17:14 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Chris Jefferson
17:12 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Andrew Haley
17:01 RE: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dave Korn
16:33 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Dale Johannesen
16:30 warning: right shift count >= width of type Andrew Haley
16:30 Re: warning: right shift count >= width of type Nathan Sidwell
16:29 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Will Cohen
16:20 warning: right shift count >= width of type Dave Korn
16:12 I am soon to be ... Ric Thornborough
16:07 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Will Cohen
15:01 Re: Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Albert Chin
14:24 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Andreas Schwab
14:23 Re: Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Andrew Walrond
14:14 How to test for duplicate error messages Volker Reichelt
14:06 Re: Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Andreas Jaeger
13:53 Re: Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Andrew Walrond
13:43 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Richard Earnshaw
13:29 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Paul Brook
12:38 Re: Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Andreas Jaeger
12:09 Re: about the third column Nathan Sidwell
12:04 about the third column Yu Neil
11:30 Configuring gcc for pure 64bit x86_64 Andrew Walrond
10:48 Re: Useless assembly Andreas Schwab
09:59 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Richard Earnshaw
09:12 Re: Test failure in libgcj on mainline Ranjit Mathew
07:41 Re: SMS parameters Mostafa Hagog
07:06 RE: large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" Luck, Tony
05:11 Re: ACATS PR status James A. Morrison
05:02 Re: ACATS PR status Richard Kenner
04:25 Re: Елена Климентьевна
04:17 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mark Mitchell
03:26 Re: Useless assembly Robert Dewar
01:24 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) bobby mcnulty junior
00:47 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Kai Henningsen

November 28, 2004
23:53 Re: ix86_address_cost Jan Hubicka
23:27 Re: How to start reading gcc source code. hgbasm
23:18 Re: Question re tree-ssa-ccp.c:substitute_and_fold Diego Novillo
23:14 Re: Question re tree-ssa-ccp.c:substitute_and_fold Richard Kenner
23:08 Re: Question re tree-ssa-ccp.c:substitute_and_fold Diego Novillo
22:46 Re: ix86_address_cost Zdenek Dvorak
22:37 Re: disable ivopts by default for 4.0? Nathanael Nerode
22:29 Re: Useless assembly jlh
22:27 Re: ix86_address_cost Jan Hubicka
22:06 ix86_address_cost Zdenek Dvorak
21:56 dg-skip-if usage problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:41 Re: Useless assembly Steven Bosscher
21:40 Re: Useless assembly Eric Botcazou
21:35 Re: Useless assembly Kazu Hirata
21:27 Useless assembly Sam Lauber
19:26 Re: ACATS PR status Richard Kenner
19:17 ACATS PR status Laurent GUERBY
18:58 Re: 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries Albert Chin
18:33 Re: disable ivopts by default for 4.0? Zdenek Dvorak
18:22 Re: inline-unit-growth=50 a bad idea Steven Bosscher
18:18 inline-unit-growth=50 a bad idea Richard Guenther
18:07 gcc-4.0-20041128 is now available gccadmin
17:13 How to start reading gcc source code. hgbasm
13:41 Re: Reducing JUMPs and using conditional exec based on if_then_else Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:02 Reducing JUMPs and using conditional exec based on if_then_else Sami Khawam
12:59 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Richard Kenner
12:50 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Toon Moene
11:25 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Toon Moene
08:06 Re: 64-bit configure hell Eric Botcazou
07:58 Re: default_elf_select_section Richard Henderson
03:50 default_elf_select_section Alan Modra

November 27, 2004
23:57 Re: 64-bit configure hell Daniel Jacobowitz
23:42 RE: large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" Dave Korn
21:58 Re: 64-bit configure hell Mike Stump
21:50 Re: large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" Mike Stump
20:48 Re: disable ivopts by default for 4.0? Giovanni Bajo
18:41 Re: Test failure in libgcj on mainline John David Anglin
18:23 disable ivopts by default for 4.0? Nathanael Nerode
18:16 Re: Test failure in libgcj on mainline Ranjit Mathew
13:44 Re: Mainline in regression-fix only mode Bernd Schmidt
08:27 Re: Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4? Paolo Bonzini
04:55 Re: Test failure in libgcj on mainline John David Anglin
03:27 Re: large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" hx w
02:46 Re: Calling function with va_list Geoffrey Keating
02:43 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Ian Lance Taylor
02:13 Re: large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" Peter Barada
01:55 large array, ia64, "segmentation fault" hx w
01:48 Question re tree-ssa-ccp.c:substitute_and_fold Richard Kenner
01:41 how to change the stack in the shell? hx w
01:15 Re: Status of the GNAT Ada compiler Luke A. Guest
01:13 Re: Status of the GNAT Ada compiler Laurent GUERBY
01:01 Re: Status of the GNAT Ada compiler Luke A. Guest
00:56 Re: Status of the GNAT Ada compiler Laurent GUERBY
00:44 Re: Status of the GNAT Ada compiler Luke A. Guest
00:08 Re: Status of the GNAT Ada compiler Andrew Pinski
00:01 Status of the GNAT Ada compiler Luke A. Guest

November 26, 2004
23:17 gcc-3.4-20041126 is now available gccadmin
22:49 Re: insertion of profiling code Jan Hubicka
21:44 Re: PATCH for Re: Mainline in regression-fix only mode Mark Mitchell
21:41 PATCH for Re: Mainline in regression-fix only mode Gerald Pfeifer
21:36 Mainline in regression-fix only mode Mark Mitchell
20:10 Re: Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4? Mikael Kilpeläinen
20:03 Re: Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4? Andrew Pinski
19:55 Re: Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4? Mikael Kilpeläinen
19:48 RE: [RFC] Using more than one access method to memory locations Dave Korn
19:38 [RFC] Using more than one access method to memory locations Svein E. Seldal
19:16 Re: Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4? Andrew Pinski
19:10 Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4? Peter Cech
17:24 Howto dump syntax tree of erroneous program? Bob Gustafson
17:16 Re: C++ and Ada. Robert Dewar
17:10 Re: C++ and Ada. Robert Dewar
17:08 Re: C++ and Ada. Luke A. Guest
16:23 Re: issues with doubles and -fno-schedule-insns2 Andrew Haley
16:02 prototype does not match any in class - maybe it should Peter Cech
16:00 RE: issues with doubles and -fno-schedule-insns2 Dave Korn
15:48 Re: issues with doubles and -fno-schedule-insns2 Giovanni Bajo
15:25 Re: issues with doubles and -fno-schedule-insns2 Matthew J Fletcher
14:27 Re: issues with doubles and -fno-schedule-insns2 Nathan Sidwell
14:17 RE: issues with doubles and -fno-schedule-insns2 Dave Korn
14:06 issues with doubles and -fno-schedule-insns2 Matthew J Fletcher
13:02 SMS parameters Nathan Sidwell
12:23 Re: 64-bit configure hell Alexandre Oliva
10:27 Re: [BENCHMARK]-mfpmath=sse should disable x387 intrinsics Martin Reinecke
08:55 Re: Test failure in libgcj on mainline Ranjit Mathew
08:52 To gcc steering committee xing xing
08:07 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Dan Kegel
07:16 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Ranjit Mathew
06:19 MacOS X gcc-4 successes Bill Northcott
06:19 Re: 64-bit configure hell Bill Northcott
05:32 Re: Lots of warning when building Java library Bryce McKinlay
05:08 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Dan Kegel
04:20 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Dan Kegel
03:26 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Dan Kegel
01:34 Re: 64-bit configure hell Peter O'Gorman
01:09 Re: 64-bit configure hell Peter O'Gorman
00:05 Re: Lots of warning when building Java library Andrew Pinski
00:01 Lots of warning when building Java library Richard Kenner

November 25, 2004
23:27 Re: question about ashlqi3 pattern Paul Schlie
23:15 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Ben Elliston
23:13 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
22:52 Fwd: cc-mode adds newlines Andrew Pinski
21:54 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Jeffrey A Law
21:17 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Joseph S. Myers
21:07 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Matt Austern
21:02 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Diego Novillo
20:59 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Dan Kegel
20:58 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Richard Kenner
20:56 Suggestion for alias.c in 4.1 Richard Kenner
20:55 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Diego Novillo
20:45 Re: 64-bit configure hell Stan Shebs
20:41 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Jeffrey A Law
20:38 Re: 64-bit configure hell Rainer Orth
20:31 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
19:49 Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? Jeffrey A Law
19:21 Re: Remove ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/index.html ? Mark Mitchell
19:14 profile-driven optimization and the linker? Dan Kegel
18:55 Re: Remove ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/index.html ? Volker Reichelt
18:12 Re: 64-bit configure hell Ulrich Weigand
18:03 Re: Remove ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/index.html ? Mark Mitchell
18:03 insertion of profiling code Kenneth Zadeck
18:03 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mike Stump
17:48 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Richard Kenner
17:48 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Joseph S. Myers
17:41 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Richard Kenner
17:39 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Nathan Sidwell
16:57 RE: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Dave Korn
16:53 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Daniel Berlin
16:47 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Andrew MacLeod
16:35 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Diego Novillo
16:32 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Richard Guenther
16:28 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Daniel Berlin
16:28 Re: 64-bit configure hell Benjamin Kosnik
16:18 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Richard Kenner
16:12 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Andrew Pinski
16:11 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Daniel Berlin
16:02 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures andscalars Diego Novillo
15:47 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Richard Kenner
15:47 Re: [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Richard Kenner
15:38 Re: Callgraph of GCC 4.0.0 nico
15:33 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Gerald Pfeifer
15:33 [RFC] ignoring type alias conflicts between structures and scalars Diego Novillo
14:20 Re: Callgraph of GCC 4.0.0 Diego Novillo
14:13 Re: Callgraph of GCC 4.0.0 nico
14:03 Re: question about ashlqi3 pattern Uros Bizjak
13:35 Fw: [Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload ofa psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr Ulrich Weigand
13:22 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Diego Novillo
12:46 Re: call graph - question ? Jan Hubicka
12:44 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Jan Hubicka
12:41 Test failure in libgcj on mainline Andrew Haley
11:25 question about ashlqi3 pattern Balaji S
10:46 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Richard Sandiford
10:17 Re: Remove ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/index.html ? Gerald Pfeifer
09:45 Re: problems with the ipa pass manager. Jan Hubicka
09:44 Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Richard Guenther
08:42 Re: Ada HEAD bootstrap ICE during gnatlib-shared on x86 and x86_64 Andrew Pinski
08:41 Re: 64-bit configure hell Andrew Pinski
08:41 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Andrew Pinski
08:41 Re: Accuracy of clock Andrew Pinski
07:15 Structure with bit-field offset is wrong. Nitin Shah
05:04 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Ian Lance Taylor
04:42 Re: Accuracy of clock Ankit Jain
04:15 Re: 64-bit configure hell Stan Shebs
03:59 Re: generalized lvalues Aaron W. LaFramboise
03:02 Does openmp support nested loop? hx w
02:43 Re: 64-bit configure hell Tom Tromey
02:42 Calling function with va_list Jan Ringoš
02:03 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Devang Patel
00:48 Re: 64-bit configure hell Joe Buck
00:33 [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Giovanni Bajo
00:20 Re: 64-bit configure hell Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:14 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Jeffrey A Law
00:03 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Jeffrey A Law

November 24, 2004
23:39 Re: C++ front end slow on MicoORB's current.cc Steven Bosscher
23:31 C++ front end slow on MicoORB's current.cc Steven Bosscher
23:24 Re: 64-bit configure hell David Edelsohn
23:17 gcc-3.3-20041124 is now available gccadmin
23:09 64-bit configure hell Stan Shebs
21:23 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Zack Weinberg
20:55 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
20:43 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2EH Danny Smith
20:40 Ada HEAD bootstrap ICE during gnatlib-shared on x86 and x86_64 Laurent GUERBY
20:03 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Kai Henningsen
20:03 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Kai Henningsen
20:02 Re: [libmudflap] Why was the toplevel libtool.m4 copied into acinclude.m4? Alexandre Oliva
19:57 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Devang Patel
19:39 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Richard Henderson
19:00 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Andrew Pinski
18:49 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Joe Buck
18:44 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Richard Henderson
18:22 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Giovanni Bajo
18:19 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Giovanni Bajo
18:13 Re: Remove ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/index.html ? Mark Mitchell
17:41 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Andrew Haley
17:40 Binaries of gcc-3.4.3 for alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
17:38 Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Jeffrey A Law
17:32 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Richard Henderson
17:29 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Gabriel Dos Reis
17:29 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mark Mitchell
17:17 simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr question Richard Kenner
17:13 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Joseph S. Myers
17:02 Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr Richard Kenner
16:34 Re: RFC: generate TLS address arithmetic for back-end Aldy Hernandez
16:30 Testing Patrick McFarland
16:12 Re: nurbs cannot be compiled with gcc 3.4 Giovanni Bajo
15:35 Re: nurbs cannot be compiled with gcc 3.4 e7677215
15:12 Re: objc data structure design Nathan Sidwell
14:23 Re: Accuracy of clock Nathan Sidwell
13:35 Re: gcc-chill3.X Diego Novillo
13:31 gcc-chill3.X Muhitov Yuriy
12:53 Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Michael Koch
12:44 Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Steven Bosscher
12:16 Re: cgraph_remove_node slow(?) Jan Hubicka
10:27 Re: nurbs cannot be compiled with gcc 3.4 Giovanni Bajo
09:41 Re: [ECOS] gcc's error? Nick Garnett
09:31 nurbs cannot be compiled with gcc 3.4 e7677215
08:49 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2EH Aaron W. LaFramboise
08:40 Re: RFC: generate TLS address arithmetic for back-end Richard Henderson
08:26 Re: RFC: generate TLS address arithmetic for back-end Aldy Hernandez
08:12 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2EH Danny Smith
08:08 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Richard Henderson
07:59 gcc's error? twomol
07:52 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2EH Danny Smith
07:08 Accuracy of clock Ankit Jain
06:58 Re: OpenMP licensing problem: a solution Joe Buck
06:34 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2EH Ranjit Mathew
05:35 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Christopher Faylor
03:20 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2EH Aaron W. LaFramboise
02:09 Re: OpenMP licensing problem: a solution Daniel Berlin
01:26 Re: OpenMP licensing problem: a solution Mike Stump
01:03 Re: OpenMP licensing problem: a solution Joe Buck
00:52 Re: Register window support in DWARF-2 Steven Bosscher
00:47 Re: OpenMP licensing problem: a solution Daniel Berlin
00:37 Re: Register window support in DWARF-2 Richard Henderson
00:32 Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Richard Henderson
00:07 Re: RFC: generate TLS address arithmetic for back-end Aldy Hernandez
00:05 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Joseph S. Myers
00:03 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Steven Bosscher

November 23, 2004
23:55 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Eric Botcazou
23:52 Re: OpenMP licensing problem: a solution Mike Stump
23:27 Register window support in DWARF-2 Eric Botcazou
23:09 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mike Stump
23:00 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
22:58 Re: GNU DWARF augmentation authority David Mosberger
22:56 Re: objc data structure design Ziemowit Laski
22:41 Re: GNU DWARF augmentation authority Daniel Berlin
22:37 Re: GNU DWARF augmentation authority David Mosberger
22:29 stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Danny Smith
22:27 Re: GNU DWARF augmentation authority Daniel Berlin
22:24 GNU DWARF augmentation authority David Mosberger
22:23 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Joseph S. Myers
22:14 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Nathan Sidwell
22:09 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Eric Botcazou
21:52 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mike Stump
21:45 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Joseph S. Myers
21:34 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Thomas Kunert
21:21 Re: RFC: generate TLS address arithmetic for back-end Richard Henderson
21:10 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Ziemowit Laski
20:16 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Paul Koning
20:05 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Eric Botcazou
20:04 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
19:34 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Richard Kenner
19:11 RFC: generate TLS address arithmetic for back-end Aldy Hernandez
19:01 objc data structure design Geoffrey Keating
18:57 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Matt Austern
18:34 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Joe Buck
18:30 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Thomas Kunert
18:27 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Giovanni Bajo
18:20 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Nathan Sidwell
18:03 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Aaron W. LaFramboise
18:03 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Joe Buck
18:02 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Thomas Kunert
17:31 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Janis Johnson
17:23 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mark Mitchell
17:19 Re: Succesful build GCC 3.4.3 Giovanni Bajo
17:16 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Giovanni Bajo
17:01 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Janis Johnson
16:50 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Andreas Schwab
16:44 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Paul Koning
16:31 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Eric Botcazou
16:12 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Andreas Schwab
16:09 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Richard Guenther
15:58 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Michael Matz
15:56 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mark Mitchell
15:56 Re: Callgraph of GCC 4.0.0 Joe Buck
15:51 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
15:51 Callgraph of GCC 4.0.0 nico
15:50 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
15:47 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
15:31 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Steve Naroff
15:15 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Michael Matz
15:09 Remove ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/index.html ? Volker Reichelt
15:07 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Andrew Pinski
15:02 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Michael Matz
15:01 GOMP Requirements 2.0 Scott Robert Ladd
14:56 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Michael Matz
14:03 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Nathan Sidwell
13:35 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Daniel Berlin
12:43 Re: miscompilation of complex switch statement Andrew Pinski
11:50 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Michael Matz
11:47 miscompilation of complex switch statement Michael Cieslinski
11:46 Succesful build GCC 3.4.3 Diggory Hardy
09:54 Re: cgraph_remove_node slow(?) Richard Guenther
09:43 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Nathan Sidwell
09:31 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Nathan Sidwell
08:39 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Eric Botcazou
08:17 OpenMP licensing problem: a solution Biagio Lucini
03:00 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving H. J. Lu
02:54 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Daniel Berlin
02:31 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Giovanni Bajo
02:15 Re: configure, CFLAGS, and libjava Tom Tromey
02:12 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mark Mitchell
02:10 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mike Stump
01:56 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Dale Johannesen
01:55 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Marcus G. Daniels
01:45 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Andrew Pinski
01:42 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Dale Johannesen
01:37 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Andrew Pinski
01:32 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Mark Mitchell
01:31 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Diego Novillo
01:28 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Dale Johannesen
01:26 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mark Mitchell
01:21 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Diego Novillo
01:19 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Mark Mitchell
01:16 Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Kazu Hirata
01:13 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Matt Austern
00:27 Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Mark Mitchell
00:20 Re: The 3.4.X line future (for the next half a year)? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:11 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Mike Stump
00:11 The Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.1 is released H. J. Lu
00:09 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Mark Mitchell
00:07 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
00:06 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
00:04 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
00:03 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis

November 22, 2004
23:57 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Gabriel Dos Reis
22:50 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Jonathan Lennox
22:33 Re: Darwin assert.h / shared libgcc mess Zack Weinberg
22:12 Re: Darwin assert.h / shared libgcc mess Geoff Keating
22:11 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Ziemowit Laski
21:45 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Matt Austern
21:39 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Joe Buck
21:31 Re: cgraph_remove_node slow(?) Jeffrey A Law
21:23 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Matt Austern
21:11 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Richard Henderson
21:01 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Nathan Sidwell
20:54 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Ziemowit Laski
20:45 Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Andrew Pinski
20:40 generalized lvalues -- patch outline Ziemowit Laski
19:17 Re: Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Kai Henningsen
18:58 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Richard Henderson
18:52 Re: -xtaso_short option on DEC Alpha Linux ? Richard Henderson
15:39 Re: Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Robert Dewar
15:21 Re: Warn implicit enum conversions Giovanni Bajo
15:19 Re: Warn implicit enum conversions Giovanni Bajo
15:02 Warn implicit enum conversions "Richter, Jörg"
14:49 -xtaso_short option on DEC Alpha Linux ? Jim McCarthy
14:44 Re: Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Andreas Schwab
14:13 Possible problem with scheduler Ronny Pedersen
13:19 Re: Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Jamie Lokier
12:44 Re: SUBREG and reload.c Richard Kenner
12:21 Re: CCP and Ada testsuite failure c330001 Richard Kenner
11:51 SUBREG and reload.c Øyvind Harboe
10:42 Re: Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Andreas Schwab
10:41 cgraph_remove_node slow(?) Richard Guenther
10:31 Re: Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Jamie Lokier
10:07 Re: Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Joseph S. Myers
09:15 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Ranjit Mathew
08:06 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Phil Edwards
07:27 Re: I can't 'make' gcc-3.4.2 on Solaris 9 Sparc Eric Botcazou
04:26 Documentation bug for __builtin_choose_expr Jamie Lokier
04:20 CCP and Ada testsuite failure c330001 Andrew Pinski
03:22 I can't 'make' gcc-3.4.2 on Solaris 9 Sparc M M
02:29 Re: Is it time to start using 4.0? Bradley Lucier
01:31 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Chuck Robey
00:59 RHEL3, openmp, got system error(22): hx w

November 21, 2004
22:13 Re: Is it time to start using 4.0? Mike Stump
21:18 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Eric Botcazou
18:02 gcc-4.0-20041121 is now available gccadmin
06:54 Re: reg. cross compiling Peter Barada
06:49 reg. cross compiling Santhu
06:24 Virus gefunden in Nachricht "FwD: Delivery_failure_notice <Esmtp:5404>" Auto-Mailer
00:24 Re: compiler memory use optimization Dan Kegel

November 20, 2004
19:28 Re: Is it time to start using 4.0? Giovanni Bajo
19:07 Is it time to start using 4.0? sean darcy
14:22 Re: problems with the ipa pass manager. Jan Hubicka
14:14 Re: problems with the ipa pass manager. Kenneth Zadeck
05:17 Re: problems with the ipa pass manager. Jan Hubicka
05:04 Re: Slow profile updating (pr 15524) Jan Hubicka
01:51 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
01:40 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
01:30 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
01:20 Re: generalized lvalues Joseph S. Myers
01:01 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Eric Botcazou
01:00 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
00:54 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Janis Johnson
00:41 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski

November 19, 2004
23:54 gcc-3.4-20041119 is now available gccadmin
22:46 Slow profile updating (pr 15524) Jeffrey A Law
22:43 RE: Linking a library Daniel Wells
22:30 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Richard Henderson
22:24 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Eric Botcazou
21:58 Re: generalized lvalues Robert McNulty Junior
21:50 Re: generalized lvalues Michael Matz
21:39 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
21:02 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Richard Henderson
20:22 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Richard Henderson
20:19 problems with the ipa pass manager. Kenneth Zadeck
20:08 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Ziemowit Laski
20:04 Re: Gcc mirros check DJ Delorie
19:57 RE: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Dave Korn
19:44 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Dan Grillo
19:29 Gcc mirros check Luca Benini
19:17 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Dale Johannesen
18:37 Benchmarking again... looking for suggestions Scott Robert Ladd
18:12 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Eric Botcazou
17:58 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Janis Johnson
17:19 GC 3.4.2 ICE while building compiler Dana, Eric
17:12 RE: Gcc3.4.2 C preprocessor problem Dave Korn
16:28 Re: Gcc3.4.2 C preprocessor problem Andrew Walrond
16:23 RE: Gcc3.4.2 C preprocessor problem Dave Korn
16:20 RE: Gcc3.4.2 C preprocessor problem Dave Korn
16:14 Gcc3.4.2 C preprocessor problem Andrew Walrond
13:31 Re: [PATCH] trunk broken for `make check' Paolo Bonzini
13:10 RE: Linking a library Dave Korn
12:56 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Richard Kenner
12:38 Re: generalized lvalues Nathan Sidwell
11:20 Re: trunk broken for `make check' Eric Botcazou
11:04 trunk broken for `make check' Karel Gardas
08:17 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Eric Botcazou
07:52 Re: Linking a library Luca Benini
06:42 Linking a library Daniel Wells
05:49 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Phil Edwards
04:52 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Ziemowit Laski
04:26 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Matt Austern
04:22 Re: generalized lvalues Matt Austern
03:56 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Gregory John Casamento
02:52 Re: generalized lvalues Zack Weinberg
02:00 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
01:41 Re: generalized lvalues Zack Weinberg
01:39 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
01:38 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Helge Hess
01:26 Re: generalized lvalues Mike Stump
01:20 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
00:57 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Rogelio Serrano
00:40 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
00:37 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Ziemowit Laski
00:20 Re: generalized lvalues Steven Bosscher
00:15 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Janis Johnson
00:14 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
00:08 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Eric Botcazou

November 18, 2004
23:49 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Janis Johnson
23:45 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Janis Johnson
23:44 Re: generalized lvalues Zack Weinberg
23:43 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
23:37 Re: generalized lvalues Andrew Pinski
23:36 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Kaz Kojima
23:36 Re: generalized lvalues Matt Austern
23:28 Re: generalized lvalues Ziemowit Laski
23:27 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Eric Botcazou
23:27 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Gregory John Casamento
23:22 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Alex Perez
22:45 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Geoffrey Keating
22:35 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Geoffrey Keating
22:30 Re: compiler memory use optimization Mike Stump
21:10 Re: Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Janis Johnson
19:33 Re: compiler memory use optimization Joe Buck
19:11 Re: [libmudflap] Why was the toplevel libtool.m4 copied into acinclude.m4? Frank Ch. Eigler
18:45 Re: compiler memory use optimization Giovanni Bajo
18:44 Re: generalized lvalues Alex Rosenberg
18:34 compiler memory use optimization naje
18:28 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
18:23 [libmudflap] Why was the toplevel libtool.m4 copied into acinclude.m4? Kelley Cook
18:19 Re: generalized lvalues Mike Stump
18:10 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
17:57 Bind expression Virender Kashyap
17:22 call graph - question ? Virender Kashyap
17:14 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
16:34 Build success for gcc 3.4.3 on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
16:23 Re: generalized lvalues Fariborz Jahanian
13:29 Re: autoconf help needed Arnaud Desitter
13:17 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Richard Sandiford
11:40 Adding call_line/call_file DWARF information Daniel Towner
09:21 Re: generalized lvalues Giovanni Bajo
07:37 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Alan Modra
07:15 Running the compat testsuite in "non-mirror" mode Eric Botcazou
05:33 Re: generalized lvalues Matt Austern
05:28 Re: generalized lvalues Joe Buck
04:31 Re: generalized lvalues Dale Johannesen
04:27 Important juha.aaltola
04:24 Hi drepper
04:21 Re: generalized lvalues Matt Austern
04:18 Re: generalized lvalues Matt Austern
04:01 Re: generalized lvalues Andrew Pinski
03:52 Re: generalized lvalues Daniel Berlin
03:50 Re: generalized lvalues Andrew Pinski
03:50 Re: generalized lvalues Andrew Pinski
03:47 generalized lvalues Matt Austern
02:43 Re: feature request Sam Lauber
01:48 Re: -sizeof() Erik Trulsson
01:19 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Bob Wilson
01:18 Re: -sizeof() Zack Weinberg
01:11 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg
01:06 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Giovanni Bajo
00:53 -sizeof() Jan Ringoš
00:53 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Alan Modra
00:50 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Alex Perez
00:46 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Mark Mitchell
00:35 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Alex Perez
00:26 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Gregory John Casamento
00:06 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg

November 17, 2004
23:50 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Joe Buck
23:47 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Alex Perez
23:31 gcc-3.3-20041117 is now available gccadmin
23:17 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Joseph S. Myers
23:05 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Phil Edwards
23:02 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Andrew Pinski
22:54 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Nicolas Roard
22:40 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Gregory John Casamento
22:32 Re: RFC: split_complex_args enhancement Aldy Hernandez
22:32 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Janis Johnson
22:28 Re: RFC: split_complex_args enhancement Alan Modra
21:53 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Ziemowit Laski
21:42 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
20:51 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Ulrich Weigand
20:26 Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Mike Stump
20:02 Re: autoconf help needed Aaron W. LaFramboise
19:58 autoconf help needed Steve Kargl
19:46 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Richard Henderson
19:20 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Eric Botcazou
19:19 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Bob Wilson
18:58 Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Ulrich Weigand
18:40 [cft] subreg validation round 2 Richard Henderson
18:33 Re: RFC: split_complex_args enhancement Aldy Hernandez
18:29 Re: RFC: split_complex_args enhancement Richard Henderson
18:18 RFC: split_complex_args enhancement Aldy Hernandez
16:45 Re: cross compiler build error fro arm Paul Brook
16:41 AW: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Beschorner Daniel
15:44 more on 17107 Nathan Sidwell
14:08 Re: Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Daniel Towner
13:55 cross compiler build error fro arm aram bharathi
13:53 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Robert Dewar
13:52 Re: Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Robert Dewar
13:51 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Luca Benini
13:40 Re: Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Nathan Sidwell
13:39 RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Michael Matz
13:19 Re: Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Robert Dewar
13:08 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Robert Dewar
13:06 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Robert Dewar
13:01 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Robert Dewar
12:56 Re: Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Daniel Towner
12:46 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Joseph S. Myers
12:45 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Robert Dewar
12:17 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Steven Bosscher
12:15 RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Dave Korn
11:59 RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Dave Korn
11:41 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Luca Benini
11:33 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Robert Dewar
11:14 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Luca Benini
11:12 Re: Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Robert Dewar
10:52 RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Dave Korn
10:47 Re: Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Nathan Sidwell
10:28 Using `const int' values to size stack arrays Daniel Towner
09:59 Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
07:43 Re: feature request Luca Benini
06:33 ColdFire V4e port submission C Jaiprakash, Noida
03:27 Re: feature request Ian Lance Taylor
03:03 Re: feature request Sam Lauber
02:05 Re: make html for fortran build request Paul Brook
01:23 make html for fortran build request Mike Stump
01:01 RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Gerald Pfeifer

November 16, 2004
21:02 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
21:02 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
18:27 Re: feature request Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 Re: feature request Luca Benini
17:56 Re: Possible gcc 3.4/4.0 bug wrt template dependant lookup Nathan Sidwell
17:51 Re: Possible gcc 3.4/4.0 bug wrt template dependant lookup Nathan Sidwell
17:47 Possible gcc 3.4/4.0 bug wrt template dependant lookup Pollard, Andrew
17:44 RE: Possible gcc 3.4/4.0 bug wrt template dependant lookup Pollard, Andrew
17:41 Re: feature request Joe Buck
17:35 Re: feature request David Skinner
17:35 Possible gcc 3.4/4.0 bug wrt template dependant lookup Pollard, Andrew
16:05 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Luca Benini
15:55 RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Beschorner Daniel
15:38 Re: AW: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Luca Benini
15:24 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders David Edelsohn
14:28 Re: Overhead of SSA operands Andrew MacLeod
14:03 a bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Kazu Hirata
13:46 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Ulrich Weigand
13:02 RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Beschorner Daniel
12:15 gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Andrew Haley
12:06 Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Luca Benini
09:13 gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question Beschorner Daniel
08:50 Re: Overhead of SSA operands Steven Bosscher
08:26 Overhead of SSA operands Steven Bosscher
07:30 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders Gabriel Paubert
06:58 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Released Eric Botcazou
06:41 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Released Mark Mitchell
04:50 Re: The 3.4.X line future (for the next half a year)? Mark Mitchell
03:57 Re: feature request Sam Lauber
03:49 Re: The 3.4.X line future (for the next half a year)? Benjamin Kosnik

November 15, 2004
23:39 Re: Darwin assert.h / shared libgcc mess Zack Weinberg
23:22 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders Gabriel Paubert
22:42 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Ulrich Weigand
22:25 Re: Darwin assert.h / shared libgcc mess Geoffrey Keating
22:08 feature request David Skinner
22:02 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
21:49 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Ulrich Weigand
21:43 Re: The 3.4.X line future (for the next half a year)? Mark Mitchell
20:50 Darwin assert.h / shared libgcc mess Zack Weinberg
20:12 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez
20:04 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
17:28 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Dorit Naishlos
16:47 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? David Edelsohn
16:18 about parse tree LIU Fang
16:08 A question for the parse tree cgllinux
13:12 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gabriel Dos Reis
12:39 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez
12:05 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Dorit Naishlos
11:18 Re: configure, CFLAGS, and libjava Rainer Orth
05:10 Re: The 3.4.X line future (for the next half a year)? Joe Buck

November 14, 2004
18:03 gcc-4.0-20041114 is now available gccadmin
15:03 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Ulrich Weigand
12:09 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez
11:23 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez
11:12 Re: latest versions of gcc and binutils Paul Brook
10:50 latest versions of gcc and binutils aram bharathi
10:41 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Eric Botcazou
07:46 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Dorit Naishlos
06:14 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
05:12 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Geert Bosch
04:41 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
00:21 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
00:07 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Eric Botcazou
00:05 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gabriel Dos Reis
00:02 Re: configure, CFLAGS, and libjava Gerald Pfeifer

November 13, 2004
23:50 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
23:47 Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Eric Botcazou
23:31 Re: configure, CFLAGS, and libjava Mike Stump
23:06 Re: Non-representable subregs of subword pseudoregs Eric Botcazou
22:55 [cft] subreg validation patch Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: Non-representable subregs of subword pseudoregs Richard Sandiford
20:37 The 3.4.X line future (for the next half a year)? Denis Vakatov
20:24 configure, CFLAGS, and libjava Gerald Pfeifer
19:24 Re: Non-representable subregs of subword pseudoregs Eric Botcazou
18:39 Re: Non-representable subregs of subword pseudoregs Ulrich Weigand
17:14 Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Volker Reichelt
13:45 Re: --enable-intermodule bootstrap Richard Guenther
13:17 Re: Non-representable subregs of subword pseudoregs Jan Hubicka
09:46 Non-representable subregs of subword pseudoregs Eric Botcazou

November 12, 2004
23:19 gcc-3.4-20041112 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Geert Bosch
21:18 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders Nathan Sidwell
20:57 Re: --enable-intermodule bootstrap Geoffrey Keating
19:45 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders David Edelsohn
19:30 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders Geoffrey Keating
18:37 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders Nathan Sidwell
18:25 Re: PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders David Edelsohn
17:16 Symbol tables in GCC Tom Crick
17:01 PR target/17101: question about powerpc s<cond> expanders Nathan Sidwell
14:50 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS & local_alloc Alessandro Lonardo

November 11, 2004
22:19 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Kenneth Zadeck
21:40 Re: Bad compile time complexity for large files ??? (fwd) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:05 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Geoffrey Keating
20:33 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez
20:15 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS & local_alloc James E Wilson
19:38 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Diego Novillo
19:31 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Roger Sayle
19:17 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Tom Tromey
19:04 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Roger Sayle
18:24 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Tom Tromey
17:45 Re: uberbaum tree fails for --target=m68k-elf Janis Johnson
17:20 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Roger Sayle
15:55 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Geert Bosch
15:45 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS & local_alloc Alessandro Lonardo
15:26 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Richard Kenner
15:17 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Daniel Berlin
15:17 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Steven Bosscher
15:15 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Daniel Berlin
15:09 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Geert Bosch
15:08 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Richard Kenner
15:07 uberbaum tree fails for --target=m68k-elf Peter Barada
15:04 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Roger Sayle
14:18 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Kenneth Zadeck
10:02 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Dorit Naishlos
09:09 GLIBC 2.3.3 build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Dan Kegel
07:56 a problem when building gcc3.3.1 twomol
04:28 Re: GLIBC 2.3.3 build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu James E Wilson
04:08 Re: TOT bootstrap failure Adam Nemet
03:13 Re: TOT bootstrap failure Andrew Pinski
01:53 Re: Bad compile time complexity for large files ??? (fwd) Mike Stump
01:24 Re: Build Breaker while trying to build gcc-3.2.2 using gcc-3.4.3 James E Wilson
00:31 Mainline is broken H. J. Lu
00:06 TOT bootstrap failure Matt Austern

November 10, 2004
23:35 gcc-3.3-20041110 is now available gccadmin
22:46 Re: a question about const and pure functions. Geoffrey Keating
20:55 Problem building 3.4.3 David Ronis
20:39 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Released Eric Botcazou
20:19 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Released Mark Mitchell
19:37 Re: Bad compile time complexity for large files ??? (fwd) Matt Austern
19:14 Bad compile time complexity for large files ??? (fwd) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:06 a question about const and pure functions. Kenneth Zadeck
18:44 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Zack Weinberg
18:27 Re: Janis Johnson appointed GCC testsuite maintainer Janis Johnson
18:19 Fixincludes magfr
18:01 Re: Example where tree PTA takes 36% of user time Andrew Pinski
17:35 Re: gcc newsletter Tom Copeland
17:32 Re: OpenMP and its testing Janis Johnson
17:03 Re: Managing different versions of GCC installed Joe Buck
16:57 Re: Example where tree PTA takes 36% of user time Daniel Berlin
16:56 Re: gcc newsletter Robert Dewar
16:46 gcc newsletter Mathieu Lacage
16:45 Re: Example where tree PTA takes 36% of user time Daniel Berlin
16:34 Example where tree PTA takes 36% of user time Bradley Lucier
15:54 Re: Janis Johnson appointed GCC testsuite maintainer Kurt Wall
15:52 Janis Johnson appointed GCC testsuite maintainer David Edelsohn
15:22 Re: New contributor on [detect mirrors] DJ Delorie
14:35 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
14:30 Re: OpenMP and its testing Biagio Lucini
13:32 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Diego Novillo
12:46 Re: OpenMP and its testing Diego Novillo
12:15 OpenMP and its testing Nick Maclaren
11:52 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Richard Kenner
11:49 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
08:35 Managing different versions of GCC installed BSH666
07:59 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Steven Bosscher
06:56 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Zack Weinberg
06:10 Re: New contributor on [detect mirrors] Luca Benini
05:03 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Jeffrey A Law
05:01 GLIBC 2.3.3 build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Sam Lauber
03:40 Re: how to build a non-lwl gcc James E Wilson
03:37 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missingstdint.h (PR 14325) Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:30 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS & local_alloc James E Wilson
03:25 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Henderson
03:22 Re: Building GCC On Tru64 5.1B James E Wilson
03:19 Re: How can i get a ref from a this pointer ? Richard Henderson
03:16 Re: UPDATE: grep problem James E Wilson
02:49 Re: Global object initialisation doesn't work ?? James E Wilson
02:41 Re: How can i get a ref from a this pointer ? James E Wilson
02:11 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Richard Kenner
02:10 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
01:45 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Daniel Berlin
01:42 Re: PATCH: target/18380: [3.4 regression]: _Unwind_FindTableEntryshouldn't be exported from libunwind.so.7 James E Wilson
01:33 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Steven Bosscher
00:58 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Zack Weinberg
00:56 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Henderson
00:52 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Jeffrey A Law
00:28 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Douglas B Rupp
00:17 Re: PATCH: PR 528: .set is broken for weak symbols H. J. Lu
00:12 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Daniel Berlin

November 09, 2004
23:58 Build Breaker while trying to build gcc-3.2.2 using gcc-3.4.3 Nitin Gupta
23:57 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
23:53 Re: GOMP Requirements v1.1 Diego Novillo
23:48 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
23:47 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
23:37 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Diego Novillo
23:09 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Daniel Berlin
22:57 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Diego Novillo
22:48 Re: New contributor on [detect mirrors] DJ Delorie
22:26 New contributor on [detect mirrors] Luca Benini
22:03 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
21:44 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Henderson
21:39 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Richard Henderson
21:29 Re: PATCH: PR 528: .set is broken for weak symbols Aaron W. LaFramboise
21:15 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Tom Tromey
20:10 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Dean Luick
19:52 RE: [Patch ping] was: Option to compile for both AMD64 and EM64T? Justin Palmer
18:13 Re: Draft release notes 3.4.3 Mark Mitchell
17:50 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Diego Novillo
16:57 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Jeffrey A Law
16:50 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Jeffrey A Law
16:29 Re: PATCH: PR 528: .set is broken for weak symbols H. J. Lu
16:02 Re: generating compare and branch instructions Paul Brook
15:47 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Jeffrey A Law
13:11 GOMP Requirements v1.1 Scott Robert Ladd
10:40 Re: Draft release notes 3.4.3 Volker Reichelt
08:30 Draft release notes 3.4.3 Toon Moene
08:15 Re: generating compare and branch instructions Zack Weinberg
07:59 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Zack Weinberg
07:37 Re: generating compare and branch instructions Øyvind Harboe
07:19 Re: generating compare and branch instructions Øyvind Harboe
06:47 Re: PATCH: PR 528: .set is broken for weak symbols Aaron W. LaFramboise
05:11 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Richard Henderson
04:17 Re: Draft release notes for GCC 3.4.3 Mark Mitchell
04:15 Re: [C++] Attributes and explicit template instantiations Mark Mitchell
03:20 Re: PR 18294: help with rtl-optimization bug on IA64 James E Wilson
02:18 Which combination of platform/debugger to debug 4.0? Bradley Lucier
00:58 Re: PATCH: PR 528: .set is broken for weak symbols Alan Modra
00:33 Re: generating compare and branch instructions Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:30 PATCH: PR 528: .set is broken for weak symbols H. J. Lu
00:15 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections James E Wilson

November 08, 2004
23:57 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections James E Wilson
23:50 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Daniel Berlin
23:46 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Daniel Jacobowitz
23:37 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Thiemo Seufer
23:08 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR George Garvey
23:03 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections James E Wilson
22:52 Checksum error on tar? Greg Ramos
22:05 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Mark Kettenis
21:52 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Tom Tromey
21:06 Re: Documentation on {} and | in inline asm to allow Intel syntax? James E Wilson
20:54 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections James E Wilson
20:18 Re: gcc-4.0-virtual function return type JFanatiker
19:59 Don't die with duplicate entries in a jarfile Andrew Haley
19:49 Re: gcc-4.0-virtual function return type JFanatiker
18:55 PR 18294: help with rtl-optimization bug on IA64 Steve Ellcey
18:53 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Zack Weinberg
18:44 Re: Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Joseph S. Myers
18:37 Configuration issues on Itanium VMS Douglas B Rupp
17:48 Successful build of gcc-3.4.3 on i686-pc-mingw32 Aaron W. LaFramboise
17:46 PATCH: target/18380: [3.4 regression]: _Unwind_FindTableEntry shouldn't be exported from libunwind.so.7 H. J. Lu
17:10 generating compare and branch instructions Øyvind Harboe
17:06 successful bootstrap/install of gcc-4.0-20041107 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
16:50 Re: gcc-4.0-virtual function return type Florian Weimer
16:24 Re: --enable-intermodule bootstrap Richard Guenther
16:03 successful build of GCC 3.4.3 on Mac OS 10.3.6 (bootstrap) Bojan Antonovic
15:08 Re: --enable-intermodule bootstrap Richard Guenther
14:19 Re: --enable-intermodule bootstrap Andrew Pinski
14:15 --enable-intermodule bootstrap Richard Guenther
14:13 generating compare and branch instructions Øyvind Harboe
13:31 Problem with libunwind.so.7 Jakub Jelinek
13:17 Re: gcc-4.0-virtual function return type Robert Dewar
12:24 Re: RTL generation Diego Novillo
12:04 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Richard Kenner
09:20 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Geoff Keating
09:18 Re: gcc-4.0-virtual function return type Nathan Sidwell
09:08 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Paolo Bonzini
08:20 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Kai Henningsen
07:07 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Steven Bosscher
06:13 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Kazu Hirata
05:52 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Zack Weinberg
05:39 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Andrew Pinski
05:15 Re: [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Zack Weinberg
04:56 [RFC] A new data structure for SWITCH_EXPR Kazu Hirata
03:33 RTL generation apollo
02:55 Re: Documentation on {} and | in inline asm to allow Intel syntax? Richard Kenner
02:47 Re: Documentation on {} and | in inline asm to allow Intel syntax? Andrew Pinski
02:42 Documentation on {} and | in inline asm to allow Intel syntax? Danny Smith
02:12 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Zack Weinberg
01:46 Your job application to Altiris Australia Recruitment
01:13 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missingstdint.h (PR 14325) Joseph S. Myers
01:01 [RFC] an update on O(1) PHI argument look up Kazu Hirata
00:56 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Zack Weinberg
00:17 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missingstdint.h (PR 14325) Joseph S. Myers
00:02 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Zack Weinberg

November 07, 2004
23:52 Re: GCC 3.4.3 Released Eric Botcazou
23:44 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missingstdint.h (PR 14325) Joseph S. Myers
23:14 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h (PR 14325) Zack Weinberg
22:55 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missingstdint.h (PR 14325) Joseph S. Myers
22:22 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missingstdint.h (PR 14325) Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:05 Re: Draft release notes for GCC 3.4.3 Toon Moene
21:05 Re: Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missingstdint.h (PR 14325) Joseph S. Myers
20:35 gcc-4.0-virtual function return type JFanatiker
20:33 Getting glibfortran to build on newlib targets aka. missing stdint.h(PR 14325) Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:28 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Toon Moene
18:13 GCC 3.4 branch thawed Mark Mitchell
18:09 gcc-4.0-20041107 is now available gccadmin
17:58 GCC 3.4.3 Released Mark Mitchell
17:16 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Daniel Jacobowitz
16:28 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Mark Kettenis
15:36 Re: pch on sparc64 Daniel Jacobowitz
15:31 Re: Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Daniel Jacobowitz
14:51 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Kazu Hirata
14:28 Mixing 32-bit and 64-bit DWARF2/3 sections Mark Kettenis
14:22 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez
13:15 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Dorit Naishlos
13:12 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Dorit Naishlos
06:23 Re: pch on sparc64 David S. Miller
02:03 Re: pch on sparc64 Daniel Jacobowitz
01:20 Re: pch on sparc64 David S. Miller

November 06, 2004
22:31 Re: Build problem this morning Richard Kenner
22:21 Re: Build problem this morning Geoffrey Keating
20:20 Re: Draft release notes for GCC 3.4.3 Joe Buck
20:12 Re: Fortran configury switch: f95 versus fortran Joe Buck
18:05 Re: Draft release notes for GCC 3.4.3 Andrew Pinski
18:05 Re: Draft release notes for GCC 3.4.3 Andrew Pinski
16:58 pch on sparc64 James A. Morrison
11:00 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez
09:50 Fortran configury switch: f95 versus fortran Gerald Pfeifer
08:42 Problems after upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.3 Panagiotis Papadakos
07:09 Draft release notes for GCC 3.4.3 Joe Buck
02:12 Re: RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? David Edelsohn
00:11 RFC: PR14880 vec_duplicate or vec_select? Aldy Hernandez

November 05, 2004
23:43 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Kenneth Zadeck
23:16 gcc-3.4-20041105 is now available gccadmin
22:43 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Kazu Hirata
22:31 Migrate to i?86-pc-windows triplet from i?86-pc-mingw32? Aaron W. LaFramboise
21:44 Re: PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 Kaz Kojima
20:14 [C++] Attributes and explicit template instantiations Matt Austern
18:25 Re: New Port Suggestion Christopher Faylor
18:13 RE: UPDATE: grep problem MCVEIGH Mark J
18:03 RE: UPDATE: grep problem Dave Korn
16:56 RE: UPDATE: grep problem MCVEIGH Mark J
16:39 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Paolo Bonzini
16:14 How can i get a ref from a this pointer ? Richard Buchmann
16:07 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Kazu Hirata
16:04 Re: PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 Joern RENNECKE
14:53 Ralf Corsepius Appointed RTEMS GCC Co-Maintainer Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
14:52 Re: Build problem this morning Richard Kenner
14:43 Re: cross build failure at fixincludes Aldy Hernandez
13:58 Re: cross build failure at fixincludes Phil Edwards
13:47 Re: [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Andrew MacLeod
13:39 Re: Build problem this morning Nathan Sidwell
13:30 Build problem this morning Richard Kenner
12:32 RE: cross build failure at fixincludes Andreas Tobler
12:22 cross build failure at fixincludes Aldy Hernandez
12:14 [RFC] Mixed results with O(1) PHI arg lookup Kazu Hirata
10:59 FYI: 2004 GCC Summit Proceedings Ranjit Mathew
10:46 Re: Latest 3.3 version Gerald Pfeifer
10:37 RE: UPDATE: grep problem Dave Korn
07:13 Global object initialisation doesn't work ?? kavii ita
06:55 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Phil Edwards
06:50 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Richard Henderson
06:34 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Zack Weinberg
05:14 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Geert Bosch
03:17 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR target/18263 ARC backend. Mark Mitchell
02:58 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR target/18263 ARC backend. Giovanni Bajo
02:47 GCC 3.4.3 Freeze Mark Mitchell
02:02 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Zack Weinberg

November 04, 2004
22:46 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Bradley Lucier
22:46 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default H. J. Lu
22:26 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Terry L Moore
22:10 Re: UPDATE: grep problem MCVEIGH Mark J
21:47 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default Geert Bosch
21:36 Re: Contradictory infos about 3.3 branch on web sites Gerald Pfeifer
21:34 Latest 3.3 version Chris Clayton
21:32 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Richard Henderson
21:31 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default Geert Bosch
20:27 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 Andrew Pinski
20:21 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 H. J. Lu
20:03 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 Andrew Pinski
19:58 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 Andrew Pinski
19:54 Mainline is broken on ia64 H. J. Lu
18:25 Re: gcc.gnu.org and IBrowse ("spambot detected" problem) Joe Buck
18:12 Re: gcc.gnu.org and IBrowse ("spambot detected" problem) Christopher Faylor
17:48 Re: patch ping: cleanup of gcc.dg/vect tests Richard Sandiford
17:14 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Zack Weinberg
17:13 Re: gcc.gnu.org and IBrowse ("spambot detected" problem) Joe Buck
17:09 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default H. J. Lu
16:29 Re: patch ping: cleanup of gcc.dg/vect tests Aldy Hernandez
14:45 Re: gcc.gnu.org and IBrowse ("spambot detected" problem) Kurt Wall
14:18 Re: g++ rejects legal? Richard Guenther
14:04 Re: g++ rejects legal? Giovanni Bajo
13:54 Re: g++ rejects legal? Richard Guenther
13:42 Re: g++ rejects legal? Giovanni Bajo
13:42 Re: g++ rejects legal? Richard Guenther
13:26 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Paolo Bonzini
13:21 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Steven Bosscher
12:22 g++ rejects legal? Richard Guenther
10:02 gcc.gnu.org and IBrowse ("spambot detected" problem) Christian Rosentreter
09:54 Re: merge_pointed_to_info Nathan Sidwell
08:35 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Paolo Bonzini
05:02 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Zack Weinberg
04:53 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support sharedlibraries enabled by default Mark Mitchell
03:22 Re: New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Bradley Lucier
02:21 Re: [RFA:] unconstify md_short_jump_size, md_long_jump_size (was: Re: Gas: making md_long_jump_size mutable) Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:44 Re: PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 Kaz Kojima
01:13 Re: Test docbook
00:38 Cross build failure on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu Kaz Kojima

November 03, 2004
23:11 gcc-3.3-20041103 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Aldy Hernandez
21:14 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default Joe Buck
21:11 Re: merge_pointed_to_info Andrew Pinski
21:07 Re: merge_pointed_to_info Diego Novillo
20:19 Re: SSA and implicit uses. Michael Matz
20:12 New development branch: ia64-fp-model-branch Zack Weinberg
18:59 Re: [PR 18143] thunk range Mark Mitchell
18:57 Building GCC On Tru64 5.1B Eduardo Bezerra
18:33 CALL_USED_REGISTERS & local_alloc Alessandro Lonardo
18:20 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default Joe Buck
16:52 Re: Porting question: define_expand Vs define_split Daniel Jacobowitz
16:43 Re: Porting question: define_expand Vs define_split DJ Delorie
15:53 Re: Compilation performance of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041021) on tramp3d-v3 Richard Guenther
14:42 RE: [OT] RE: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default Dave Korn
14:30 Re: [OT] RE: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't supportshared libraries enabled by default Paolo Carlini
13:46 [OT] RE: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default Dave Korn
13:37 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Jan Hubicka
12:52 gcc newsletter #14 Mathieu Lacage
12:27 Re: gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
11:49 Re: gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Ralf Corsepius
11:39 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Richard Earnshaw
11:34 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Jan Hubicka
11:26 Re: [C++] Extensions deprecated in 3.4 Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
10:32 Re: Question about insn lengths Richard Earnshaw
10:23 Matrix layout transpose based on profile information Revital Eres
09:34 merge_pointed_to_info Nathan Sidwell
09:11 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Zack Weinberg
09:02 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
08:36 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Jan Hubicka
08:35 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Jan Hubicka
07:24 Re: More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Zack Weinberg
06:43 Porting question: define_expand Vs define_split Balaji S
05:18 Re: What are these test result differences? Kazu Hirata
04:52 More on compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
04:29 Re: Question about insn lengths Eric Christopher
03:16 Re: Question about insn lengths DJ Delorie
03:00 Re: Question about insn lengths Daniel Jacobowitz
02:58 Re: Question about insn lengths Jeffrey A Law
01:39 how to build a non-lwl gcc eagle_zhou
00:29 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
00:06 Re: Question about insn lengths DJ Delorie

November 02, 2004
23:37 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Henderson
23:34 Re: Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Henderson
22:28 Re: Question about insn lengths Eric Christopher
22:14 Re: PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support sharedlibraries enabled by default Mark Mitchell
22:01 Re: Question about insn lengths Pontus Lidman
21:53 Re: Question about insn lengths Pontus Lidman
21:45 Re: Question about insn lengths Pontus Lidman
19:54 Re: Where is the mainline snapshot of last week? Gerald Pfeifer
19:51 Re: Where is the mainline snapshot of last week? Joseph S. Myers
19:21 Re: Gcc is broken on ia64 Nathan Sidwell
18:56 Gcc is broken on ia64 H. J. Lu
18:46 Where is the mainline snapshot of last week? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
18:44 Re: Please review 3.4 patches David Mosberger
18:13 PATCH: PR other/17783: Top level configure doesn't support shared libraries enabled by default H. J. Lu
18:02 Re: Please review 3.4 patches H. J. Lu
18:00 Re: Please review 3.4 patches H. J. Lu
17:51 Re: Please review 3.4 patches H. J. Lu
17:43 Re: SSA and implicit uses. Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
17:13 Re: New warning options for 4.0? Joe Buck
16:35 Re: What are these test result differences? Joe Buck
16:33 Re: SSA and implicit uses. Joe Buck
16:30 Re: gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
15:58 New warning options for 4.0? Sam Lauber
14:58 Re: Question about insn lengths DJ Delorie
14:40 SSA and implicit uses. Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
14:09 Re: What are these test result differences? Kazu Hirata
13:56 Re: What are these test result differences? Gerald Pfeifer
13:51 Re: What are these test result differences? James A. Morrison
13:43 What are these test result differences? Kazu Hirata
12:33 Re: gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Richard Earnshaw
12:25 Re: gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
11:52 [C++] Extensions deprecated in 3.4 Giovanni Bajo
10:56 Re: gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Richard Earnshaw
10:49 Re: Question about insn lengths Richard Sandiford
10:09 Question about insn lengths Andrew Haley
09:56 Question about insn lengths Pontus Lidman
09:11 Contradictory infos about 3.3 branch on web sites Victor V. Terber
08:22 Re: Please review 3.4 patches Mark Mitchell
07:49 Re: Please review 3.4 patches Jakub Jelinek
06:02 Re: Please review 3.4 patches Mark Mitchell
01:38 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner
00:59 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Henderson
00:25 Re: gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Eric Christopher
00:24 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-26) Andrew MacLeod
00:22 gcc 3.3.5 arm-elf .. which multilib for soft-float? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp

November 01, 2004
23:35 Re: [Warning] When passing const reference and default value Joe Buck
23:17 Another case of DCE deleting live code Richard Kenner
22:25 Re: Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for4.x Vladimir Makarov
22:09 [Warning] When passing const reference and default value Mathieu Malaterre
21:48 Re: Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for4.x Jeffrey A Law
21:33 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner
21:06 Paul Brook appointed ARM co-maintainer Mark Mitchell
21:03 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Henderson
20:11 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Paul Schlie
19:18 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Ulrich Weigand
18:54 Re: Prerelease is not a treat on ia64 (at least older ia64 systems) Joe Buck
18:49 Re: Prerelease is not a treat on ia64 (at least older ia64 systems) H. J. Lu
18:46 Re: Prerelease is not a treat on ia64 (at least older ia64 systems) Joe Buck
18:45 Re: Prerelease is not a treat on ia64 (at least older ia64 systems) Joe Buck
18:44 Re: Prerelease is not a treat on ia64 (at least older ia64 systems) H. J. Lu
18:40 Re: Prerelease is not a treat on ia64 (at least older ia64 systems) Mark Mitchell
18:38 Prerelease is not a treat on ia64 (at least older ia64 systems) Joe Buck
18:36 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner
18:35 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner
18:07 Re: Bug in tree-sra.c:sra_walk_modify_expr Richard Henderson
18:04 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Henderson
17:57 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Richard Henderson
17:54 Re: Python frontend? Robert Dewar
16:47 Re: Trick or treat? H. J. Lu
16:33 Please review 3.4 patches H. J. Lu
16:29 Re: [PR 18143] thunk range Gabriel Dos Reis
16:26 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Gabriel Dos Reis
15:57 Re: Trick or treat? Geert Bosch
15:53 Re: Bug in tree-sra.c:sra_walk_modify_expr Richard Kenner
15:52 Re: Bug in tree-sra.c:sra_walk_modify_expr Richard Kenner
15:36 Re: Bug in tree-sra.c:sra_walk_modify_expr Andrew Pinski
15:26 Bug in tree-sra.c:sra_walk_modify_expr Richard Kenner
14:31 RE: Python frontend? Dave Korn
13:51 SSE scalars, intrinsics and transition to "float"... tbp
13:37 Re: Python frontend? Robert Dewar
13:23 Re: Python frontend? Andrew Haley
12:47 Re: Python frontend? Robert Dewar
11:43 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Paul Schlie
11:30 Re: Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for4.x Giovanni Bajo
11:27 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner
11:19 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner
10:59 Re: [PR 18143] thunk range Jakub Jelinek
10:14 [PR 18143] thunk range Nathan Sidwell
10:03 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Joseph S. Myers
09:48 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Jan Hubicka
09:19 Python frontend? Andrew Haley
06:04 Re: Trick or treat? Mark Mitchell
05:55 Re: Trick or treat? Zack Weinberg
05:47 Re: Trick or treat? Andrew Pinski
05:10 Trick or treat? Mark Mitchell
04:57 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Joe Buck
04:13 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Giovanni Bajo
03:34 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Randy.Dunlap
03:33 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner
03:06 Re: Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Andrew Pinski
02:50 Inlining, nested functions, and VLAs Richard Kenner

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3