This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: "4.0" in known-to-fail field
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:49:32 -0400
- Subject: Re: "4.0" in known-to-fail field
- References: <4183EC9A.1020209@codesourcery.com>
I'll do this by script.
I thought i did both fields (known to work and known to fail), but
apparently i missed one.
On Oct 30, 2004, at 3:33 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
A lot of PRs have "4.0" in the known-to-fail field.? Any change to such
a PR results in a complaint from Buzilla that this is an invalid
setting; it wants "4.0.0".? Would one of the bugmasters care to go
through and correct all open bugs that have "4.0" in the known-to-fail
field?
Thanks,
--?
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
I'll do this by script.
I thought i did both fields (known to work and known to fail), but
apparently i missed one.
On Oct 30, 2004, at 3:33 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
A lot of PRs have "4.0" in the known-to-fail field.? Any change to such
a PR results in a complaint from Buzilla that this is an invalid
setting; it wants "4.0.0".? Would one of the bugmasters care to go
through and correct all open bugs that have "4.0" in the known-to-fail
field?
Thanks,
--?
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com