This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
GCC Status Report (2004-10-26)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:28:14 -0700
- Subject: GCC Status Report (2004-10-26)
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com
GCC 3.4.3
=========
There are 126 regressions targeted at GCC 3.4.3, which is almost
exactly the same as the 129 on October 8th. Of these 24 are
wrong-code, 30 are ice-on-valid code, and 9 are rejects-valid. Most
of these are also 4.0 regressions, so fixing these is a win for both
3.4.3 and 4.0.
I wish there were fewer problems, but I'm still planning to make a
3.4.3 release next week. As of Friday, October 29th, the branch will
be slushy; all non-documentation patches after that point will require
my explicit approval.
GCC 4.0
=======
There are 200 regressions targeted at GCC 4.0, down from 223 on
October 8th. Of these, 36 are wrong-code, 54 are ice-on-valid-code,
and 14 are rejects-valid. However, of these many have to do with Ada,
Java, or platforms that are not on the primary platform lists.
I'm still targeting 100 regressions before we make the branch, but I
plan to make a pass over the open regressions and retarget those that
I can tomorrow. I expect that after that, we will be much closer.
I have been informed that our SPEC benchmark results are looking
pretty good, which matches our independent observations. However,
there are apparently regressions in perlbmk and mgrid. Andy MacLeod
has a potential fix for the perlbmk problem here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00488.html
I intend to review this patch, if nobody else gets to it.
Zdenek has a patch to improve mgrid here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02007.html
but there is some controvesy about various parts of that patch. I
intend to review this patch as well, perhaps consulting with various
other people with more expertise in this area.