This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotionapproach

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: dewar at gnat dot com
Cc: zack at codesourcery dot com, schlie at comcast dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:30:57 -0400
Subject: Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotionapproach
References: <BDA2DEAF.786C%schlie@comcast.net> <87breqebza.fsf@codesourcery.com> <417D6DBC.7080108@gnat.com>

> The best approach is to quote selectively. Personally
> I really dislike message which have pages of quoted junk
> you have have to scroll through to find a reply. When
> more than one person starts doing this, you end up with
> a complete thread in each message.

Usenet used to reject messages with more quoted text than new text.
Perhaps we could try such a filter in our mailing list software?  It
would, of course, reject most patch approvals ;-)

References:
- Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operatorclassification/promotion approach
  - From: Paul Schlie
- Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotion approach
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotionapproach
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]