This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libcpp built by host compiler?
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:00:35 -0400
- Subject: Re: libcpp built by host compiler?
- References: <417C9D06.2060200@aaronwl.com>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:28:22AM -0500, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
> While investigating wrong-code PR gcc/18139
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18139>, I noticed that,
> during a normal bootstrap, libcpp is built by the host compiler, but
> never re-built by the bootstrapped compilers. This results in the
> libcpp portion of the final gcc executables being compiled by the host
> compiler rather than by the bootstrapped compiler.
>
> Isn't all of GCC supposed to be bootstrapped, including libcpp?
Yes... this is a temporary loss, between the separation of libcpp and
top-level bootstrap. Try --enable-bootstrap and see if that works
better?
Ah, I see Paolo's already suggested that in the bug log.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz