This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
ieee.exp tests containing generic FP tests
- From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- To: rth at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:16:45 -0400
- Subject: ieee.exp tests containing generic FP tests
Hi Richard. Hi folks.
Most of the tests in execute/ieee/ fail on the e500 (and the Vax for
that matter), but there are a handful that pass, and which I don't
consider IEEE compliance tests.
Could someone more IEEE savvy point out which tests could be moved one
level higher (gcc.c-torture/execute). I volunteer to move them,
I'm just not sure whether all the ones I think should be moved, should...
In particular, I believe we should keep all the INF, NAN, PZERO,
NZERO, *ORDERED, tests in ieee/ and move everything else out.
For example, these are a few I believe don't belong in IEEE:
20001122-1.c
20010114-2.c
20011123-1.c
20030331-1.c
acc1.c
etc.
OTOH, things like fp-cmp*, mzero*, compare-fp*, etc do obviously belong in
IEEE.
Agreed? Am I missing something?
Cheers.
Aldy