This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -V and -b fails of g++

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: "Dana, Eric" <Eric_Dana at bmc dot com>
Cc: "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:58:00 -0400
Subject: Re: -V and -b fails of g++
References: <F12B6443B4A38748AFA644D1F8EF353202692A26@bos-ex-01.adprod.bmc.com>

On Oct 15, 2004, at 11:52 AM, Dana, Eric wrote:

When using gcc 3.4.2 with the -V or -b switch, the appropriate gcc compiler is invoked. However when using g++ with -V or -b switch, the appropriate gcc compiler is invoked (well not appropriate any more), instead of the appropriate g++ compiler. We're in the process of testing multiple versions of GCC and a possibly a cross-compiler environment. In the old days (2.95.x) and early 3.x, using g++ with -V and -B worked. Was the change in functionality intentional, if not, should I file a PR? Thanks.


There is already a PR about this see PR 10707 but it is suspended.
In fact for a while -V was removed from GCC.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- -V and -b fails of g++
  - From: Dana, Eric

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]