This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: "Lars Segerlund" <lars dot segerlund at comsys dot se>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:33:30 +0200
Subject: Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP
References: <416D5F62.1040508@coyotegulch.com><416E2C4A.8090308@gnu.org><04bb01c4b1dc$ea67f720$18422597@bagio><20041014132920.15066158@zeta.comsys.se><056b01c4b1e3$3f935810$18422597@bagio> <20041014202116.5680b59e@zeta.comsys.se>

Lars Segerlund wrote:

>> An example on what semantics part you have in mind that must be done
>> in the frontend?

>  C and C++ treats the same OMP statements a bit different, thus you
> have to have some different frontends for them. 

Can you please be a little more specific? A specific example would help a lot.

Giovanni Bajo

References:
- [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP
  - From: Lars Segerlund
- Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]