This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com>,Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>,gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:54:43 -0700
Subject: Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada
References: <10410062023.AA16633@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <F380387B-17D9-11D9-80FD-000A959A128E@gnat.com> <200410062337.55110.stevenb@suse.de> <41647306.5040008@gnat.com>

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote:
> One thing to be aware of in the Ada case is the requirement for
> properly tracking the distinction between a generic template and
> its instantiations, to all depths of instantiation.

Don't we have the same issue in C++?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada
  - From: Robert Dewar

References:
- Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada
  - From: Geert Bosch
- Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]