This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Results for 4.0.0 20040930 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1



On Sep 30, 2004, at 11:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:


FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c scan-tree-dump f1: va_list escapes 0, needs to save 0 GPR units and 0 FPR units
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c scan-tree-dump f2: va_list escapes 0, needs to save [148] GPR units and 0 FPR units
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c scan-tree-dump f3: va_list escapes 0, needs to save 0 GPR units and [1-9][0-9]* FPR units
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c scan-tree-dump f6: va_list escapes 0, needs to save (3|12|24) GPR units and 0 FPR units
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-4.c scan-tree-dump f1: va_list escapes 0, needs to save all GPR units and 0 FPR units
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-4.c scan-tree-dump f2: va_list escapes 0, needs to save 0 GPR units and all FPR units
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-4.c scan-tree-dump f3: va_list escapes 0, needs to save [148] GPR units and 0 FPR units
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-4.c scan-tree-dump f4: va_list escapes 0, needs to save 0 GPR units and [1-9][0-9]* FPR units

I see these all fail on darwin, though for will fail on AIX also, could
someone make the constraint on what targets the testcase tests more strict?


powerpc-*-* is too loose for PPC because AIX and Darwin almost follow the
same ABI unlike SYSV based PPCs.



Thanks, Andrew Pinski


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]