This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mudflap problem

From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Herman ten Brugge <hermantenbrugge at home dot nl>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 28 Sep 2004 18:11:28 -0400
Subject: Re: mudflap problem
References: <4159BBC2.8010504@home.nl><y0mmzzagl06.fsf@toenail.toronto.redhat.com>

I wrote:

> This should not be happening, unless some intermediate compiler pass
> is lowering the ARRAY_REF (b[i]) to a plain INDIRECT_REF (* b+i)
> type expression.  [...]

It turns out that this lowering is occurring in the current
tree-mudflap.c code itself.  (See how ARRAY_REF is handled in
mf_build_check_statement_for().)  It used not to do that - I'm
investigating when/why this function became broken.

- FChE

References:
- mudflap problem
  - From: Herman ten Brugge
- Re: mudflap problem
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]