This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Target Milestone signification ?

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <mmalater at nycap dot rr dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:30:51 -0700
Subject: Re: Target Milestone signification ?
References: <41559C42.1080404@nycap.rr.com> <D6DBF17A-0F10-11D9-921D-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu>

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:34:58PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> On Sep 25, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 	I am looking at this bug:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15526
> > 	And it says to be 'Target Milestone: 3.4.1', does that means this is 
> > fixed in 3.4.1 ?
> 
> The Target Milestone is usually right unless someone messed up which it
> looks like what happened.  I was fixed only on the mainline (4.0.0).
> 
> It should have been fixed in the  3.4 branch but it was not, I reopened 
> the
> bug so we know that it is not fixed yet since this is a regression.

I use the target milestone in preparing the release notes, so I falsely
reported this one as fixed.  If anyone finds problems like this (bugs
marked as fixed in 3.4.x or 3.3.x that are not fixed), please cc me when
you report it; I'll try to clean this up next week.

References:
- Target Milestone signification ?
  - From: Mathieu Malaterre
- Re: Target Milestone signification ?
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]