This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Obsolete building in source dir?


aoliva@redhat.com (Alexandre Oliva)  wrote on 18.09.04 in <or8yb77c6m.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>:

> On Sep 18, 2004, kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
>
> > aoliva@redhat.com (Alexandre Oliva)  wrote on 17.09.04 in
> > <oru0twubfc.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>:
> >> On Sep 16, 2004, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@freenet.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Instead of doing this you could consider to systematically using
> >> > $host(_alias), $build(_alias), $target(_alias) builddir-subdirectories,
> >> > no matter if cross-compiling or not.
> >>
> >> This wouldn't quite work if we actually need different builds for say
> >> build, host and target, but they're all the same.
>
> > That's trivial to fix by using a {host,build,target}- prefix.
>
> Which brings us back to exactly what I had suggested before Ralf's
> counter-proposal :-)

Wrong. You proposed build-gcc, he proposed $buils(_alias)-gcc, I proposed  
build-$build(_alias)-gcc.

MfG Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]