This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis

From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
To: Natros <natros at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 17:35:16 -0400
Subject: Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis
References: <414C6C0E.3070503@coyotegulch.com> <79a288c604091814214452c6a2@mail.gmail.com>

Natros wrote:

You can use Dinkumware libraries with icc -cxxlib-icc, so you don't
need a "standard" gcc install. On my gentoo I exported the
CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH

$ export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/include/g++-v3:/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i6
86-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/include/g++-v3/i686-pc-linux-gnu

I'd prefer not to address Intel questions in the GCC forum, and this will be the last one I answer herein.

I tried using the Dinkum libraries, and still received linker errors in some cases. Rather than fight the problem, I figured out what Intel wanted from GCC. I'll add a note about this in next week's addendum.

--
Scott Robert Ladd
site: http://www.coyotegulch.com
blog: http://chaoticcoyote.blogspot.com

References:
- Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis
  - From: Natros

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]