This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ada mainline

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Richard Kenner wrote:

> The patches are visible in both cases, so there's no difference with
> respect to #1 and #2.  As to #3, see my response to RTH: either such
> discussions don't exist or they can't be made public in real-time due
> to the proprietary nature of the bug report.

So provide the detailed explanation afterwards, with the patch.  Look at 
<>.  This suffers 
from the problems of a proprietary testcase, in a proprietary testsuite, 
for a problem in reload, which only shows the problem with 3.3 and 3.4 
because of the tree optimisers.  Any one of these might make providing a 
public testcase difficult or impossible.  But it includes a detailed 
explanation, longer than the patch, which both helps understand the 
problem and might also help people unfamiliar with reload to learn about 
it.  If a non-confidential synthetic testcase suitable for the lists and 
the public testsuite cannot be constructed, you need to go to that much 
more effort to be sure the explanation is absolutely clear.

Joseph S. Myers      - status of C90 for GCC 3.5 (personal mail) (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]