This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: profiledbootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin

On Sep 8, 2004, at 2:26 PM, Caroline Tice wrote:
I'm getting the following failures doing a profiled bootstrap using FSF mainline on a G4 running powerpc-apple-darwin. Normal bootstrap works fine, and profiled bootstrap appears to work on x86 running Linux. I believe this has been broken since last Friday. Does anybody have any ideas as to who/what broke this?

stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/powerpc-apple-darwin7.0.0/bin/ -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -fprofile-generate -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -Werror -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -o gengtype \
gengtype.o gengtype-lex.o gengtype-yacc.o ../build-powerpc-apple-darwin7.0.0/libiberty/libiberty.a

make[2]: *** [s-gtype] Bus error

Ah! Cool, someone else is seeing this... I was seeing it with a patch that should not have failed to bootstrap. I wonder if someone killed binary compatibility between stage1/stage[^1].... :-(

*** config/darwin.h.~1~ Wed Dec 10 17:22:30 2003
--- config/darwin.h     Thu Jan 22 18:03:20 2004
*************** objc_section_init (void)                        \
*** 712,717 ****
--- 712,729 ----
  #define GLOBAL_ASM_OP ".globl "
  #define TARGET_ASM_GLOBALIZE_LABEL darwin_globalize_label

+ do { \
+ unsigned int localsize = SIZE; \
+ if (localsize == 0) \
+ ++localsize; \
+ if (FILE) \
+ fprintf (FILE, "\t.zerofill __DATA,__bss,"); \
+ assemble_name (FILE, NAME); \
+ fprintf (FILE, ",%u,%d\n", localsize, \
+ floor_log2 (ALIGNMENT / BITS_PER_UNIT)); \
+ } while (0)
/* Emit an assembler directive to set visibility for a symbol. Used
to support visibility attribute and Darwin's private extern
feature. */

is the patch, just in case someone else wants a simpler testcase... In time, I'll have to tack this down if I want my patch in... While I think this may be the same problem, it might not be...

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]