This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Problem with operand handling

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: amacleod at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 04 17:38:43 EDT
Subject: Re: Problem with operand handling

    I think he was looking for the traceback froim this abort() so we can
    see where the real operand is incorrectly being added to the alias
    list...

Sorry.  This was a small enough test case that I already was able to set
a breakpoint there.

It's from compute_flow_insensitive_aliasing.  But I see something
interesting.  This is in addressable_vars and TREE_ADDRESSABLE isn't
set.  That's wrong, isn't it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with operand handling
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]