This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Problem with operand handling
- From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:47:57 -0400
- Subject: Re: Problem with operand handling
- References: <10409072035.AA26895@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 16:35, Richard Kenner wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>
> > system__traceback_entries__traceback_entry___XDLU_0__18446744073709551615[1 .. T.2] & decorator_traceback;
>
> What does this declaration mean?
>
> I think this is how it prints a REFERENCE_TYPE.
>
> This may help. Put this test in add_may_alias:
>
> if (is_gimple_reg (var) || is_gimple_reg (alias))
> abort ();
>
> It aborts, as I think you expected.
I think he was looking for the traceback froim this abort() so we can
see where the real operand is incorrectly being added to the alias
list...
Andrew