This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: generic vectors: how should they work?
Paolo> I don't understand this comment. I see SIMD types as a synonym of
Paolo> vectors. "Portable vectors", "generic vectors", "portable SIMD types",
Paolo> "generic SIMD types" seem all synonyms to me.
I thought that I already explained the distinction in the previous
If you meant generic vectors as in, arbitrarily sized and/or with a size
decided at run-time, then no, this is not my purpose. GCC portable SIMD
types (this is your nomenclature if I understood) have their size
established at compile-time, and it must be a power of two.