gcc archive
date index for September, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2004
22:38 C pre-DR#9: implementation-defined bit-field types Joseph S. Myers
22:00 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
21:23 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
21:02 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Steven Bosscher
20:40 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
20:02 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
20:02 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
20:01 Re: C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Geoffrey Keating
19:57 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Geoffrey Keating
19:56 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Geoffrey Keating
19:34 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
19:06 RE: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Dave Korn
18:43 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
17:27 Re: Architecture-dependent optimizations Jan Hubicka
17:10 Architecture-dependent optimizations aimen bouchhima
17:05 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
17:03 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
16:51 Re: Results for 4.0.0 20040930 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1 David Edelsohn
16:29 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
15:58 Re: Results for 4.0.0 20040930 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1 Andrew Pinski
14:44 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
14:39 Re: [non-GCC] Writing a compiler-backend for Linux/PowerPC Joseph S. Myers
14:32 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
14:03 [non-GCC] Writing a compiler-backend for Linux/PowerPC Suriya Narayanan M S
13:46 Re: About GCC in Mandrake Linux Kurt Wall
12:00 re: 2.95.3 gcc compiler does not install in Mac_OS_X 10.2 Dan Kegel
11:29 Re: [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
11:27 Re: [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
11:26 2.95.3 gcc compiler does not install in Mac_OS_X 10.2 Danilo José
11:00 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
10:57 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
10:57 About GCC in Mandrake Linux Bud
08:51 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
08:50 Re: [RFC] autopinger Ranjit Mathew
08:42 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
08:17 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
08:11 Re: Implementing multi-methods for C++ in GCC Lassi A . Tuura
08:03 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
07:57 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
06:58 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
05:48 Re: [RFC] autopinger Ben Elliston
02:09 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
01:50 [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
01:37 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
01:27 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
00:57 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location James A. Morrison

September 29, 2004
23:35 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
23:32 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
23:14 gcc-3.3-20040929 is now available gccadmin
23:07 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Matt Austern
23:01 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
22:53 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
22:50 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
22:50 Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
22:06 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
21:57 duplicate static ctor/dtor function emission Frank Ch. Eigler
20:56 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
19:24 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
19:24 Re: gcc mainline build failure David Edelsohn
19:00 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
18:45 gcc mainline build failure Fariborz Jahanian
18:44 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Matt Austern
18:14 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
18:06 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
18:04 glibc can be compiled by gcc 4.0 again! Andreas Jaeger
18:04 Re: bugzilla problem Aaron W. LaFramboise
18:01 problem creating a static library Danilo José
17:10 Re: O2 optimization differences Dale Johannesen
16:28 Re: bug in cse.c Richard Henderson
16:18 Re: Implementing multi-methods for C++ in GCC Joe Buck
16:14 Re: O2 optimization differences Joe Buck
15:36 Re: AIX bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
15:23 Re: AIX bootstrap failure jlquinn
13:50 Re: bugzilla problem Daniel Berlin
13:35 Re: bugzilla problem Richard Guenther
13:26 Re: bugzilla problem Daniel Berlin
13:16 Re: bugzilla problem Andrew Pinski
13:12 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
13:09 bugzilla problem micis
10:19 Re: O2 optimization differences Nathan Sidwell
09:44 O2 optimization differences Sujith R.
07:58 Implementing multi-methods for C++ in GCC Lassi A . Tuura
07:57 Re: Building GCC nico
07:54 Re: Building GCC nico
07:47 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X10.2.8) Di-an JAN
07:19 Re: C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Joseph S. Myers
07:17 Re: [RFT] b=linux, h=mingw32, t=mingw32 java cross. Mohan Embar
06:50 Re: Bootstrap failure on SH Kaz Kojima
06:13 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Dan Kegel
05:58 Re: Bootstrap failure on SH Ben Elliston
05:55 Re: Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? Ranjit Mathew
05:17 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Joe Buck
05:09 Bootstrap failure on SH Kaz Kojima
04:59 variations of .section directives - how to config? Gary Funck
02:41 Re: C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Dale Johannesen
01:57 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Kurt Wall
00:53 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Jason Molenda
00:28 C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Joseph S. Myers

September 28, 2004
22:46 Looking for GCC/compiler expertise Derrick Keefe
22:11 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
21:38 C pre-DR#7: VLA definitions Joseph S. Myers
21:07 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
20:59 Re: Bootstrap broken on aix David Edelsohn
20:52 -E and -fgnu-runtime options - bug or feature? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
20:32 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Tom Tromey
20:30 Bootstrap broken on aix jlquinn
19:30 mudflap problem Herman ten Brugge
18:37 bug in cse.c Leehod Baruch
18:07 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Richard Kenner
17:59 GCC-3.3.5 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:38 Re: Programming Language for Beginners James A. Morrison
17:34 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Nathan Sidwell
17:16 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Jan Hubicka
17:14 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Andrew Haley
17:08 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
17:05 [RFC] Tightening up the type system Andrew Haley
16:47 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Per Bothner
16:44 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Per Bothner
16:38 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Richard Kenner
15:38 RE: Building GCC Dave Korn
15:36 [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
15:16 gcc 4.0 bobby mcnulty
14:58 Re: Building GCC Ian Lance Taylor
14:27 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Colin Douglas Howell
14:27 Building GCC nico
13:05 Re: warnings when building gcc-4.0.0-20040927 on sparc64-linux... Andrew Pinski
12:58 gcc 4.0 bobby mcnulty
12:57 Re: Programming Language for Beginners James A. Morrison
11:44 [RFC] Variable Expansion in unroller Revital Eres
11:42 warnings when building gcc-4.0.0-20040927 on sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
11:40 Re: Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? bobby mcnulty
11:07 Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? Ranjit Mathew
09:14 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Andrew Haley
08:54 SMS scheduling Canqun Yang
06:33 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Aaron W. LaFramboise
03:32 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 chrix
00:18 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
00:12 Re: Question about constraints and reload Peter Barada

September 27, 2004
23:17 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
23:03 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Kelley Cook
22:32 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Tom Tromey
22:17 The linux binutils 2.15.92.0.2 is released H. J. Lu
21:16 Re: [OPEN64] source to source compilers Diego Novillo
21:12 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
20:58 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
20:58 Re: [OPEN64] source to source compilers Jairo Balart Tarzan
20:25 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versionsofcompiler runtime environment? James E Wilson
20:15 Re: adjusting stack size of executable compiled by gcc Mike Stump
19:58 source to source compilers peremolina at ya dot com
19:27 Re: mainline bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin. David Edelsohn
19:26 Re: mainline bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin. Andreas Tobler
19:24 mainline bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin. Fariborz Jahanian
19:15 Re: PT_GNU_EH_FRAME based unwinding on non-glibc systems Richard Henderson
18:19 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' bobby mcnulty
17:24 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' H. J. Lu
16:36 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
15:33 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' bobby mcnulty
15:27 New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
15:16 Re: adjusting stack size of executable compiled by gcc tm_gccmail
15:12 Re: Question about constraints and reload tm_gccmail
14:01 [RFT] b=linux, h=mingw32, t=mingw32 java cross. Kelley Cook
13:25 Re: GCC build of HEAD failed for native with your patch on 2004-09-27T04:12:39Z. Andrew Pinski
13:17 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
13:12 adjusting stack size of executable compiled by gcc tony vong
13:01 gcc newsletter #12 Mathieu Lacage
12:04 Re: Question about constraints and reload tm_gccmail
11:56 Re: [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Mircea Namolaru
05:14 Re: How to specify gcc stack size Zack Weinberg
05:05 Re: How to specify gcc stack size Andreas Jaeger
03:15 How to specify gcc stack size tony vong
02:36 Re: Metabug for patches waiting for GCC 4.1 Giovanni Bajo
02:04 Re: Question about constraints and reload Geoff Keating
01:59 Re: Question about constraints and reload Geoff Keating

September 26, 2004
23:05 SRA and MOVE_RATIO Ulrich Weigand
21:36 Re: Question about constraints and reload Andrew Pinski
21:30 Re: Question about constraints and reload Geoffrey Keating
20:40 PT_GNU_EH_FRAME based unwinding on non-glibc systems Mark Kettenis
19:21 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Jamie Lokier
17:58 gcc-4.0-20040926 is now available gccadmin
11:48 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Marc Espie
00:31 Re: 'make boostrap' / gcc 4.0 Mathieu Malaterre
00:14 Re: 'make boostrap' / gcc 4.0 Ben Elliston
00:09 'make boostrap' / gcc 4.0 Mathieu Malaterre

September 25, 2004
22:43 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Richard Henderson
22:21 Re: ftrapv question Mathieu Malaterre
21:51 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Steven Bosscher
21:51 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Andrew Pinski
21:50 Re: ftrapv question Andrew Pinski
21:36 ftrapv question Mathieu Malaterre
21:27 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: Question about constraints and reload Richard Kenner
19:41 Re: Reducing the size of the binaries Oscar Fuentes
19:37 Re: Reducing the size of the binaries Kevin Puetz
19:04 Reducing the size of the binaries Juan Ignacio Garzón
18:55 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Andrew Pinski
18:52 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Mike Stump
18:43 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
17:52 Re: IBM Sponsoring Release Management Toon Moene
17:50 Re: -mtune != -march (>=) - optimizing for a higher architecture Tom Alsberg
17:30 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Joe Buck
17:25 Re: Question about constraints and reload Steven Bosscher
16:39 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
16:35 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Andrew Pinski
16:26 Target Milestone signification ? Mathieu Malaterre
16:08 Re: Question about constraints and reload Steven Bosscher
15:51 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Steven Bosscher
15:14 Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Zdenek Dvorak
14:56 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
14:40 Re: LNO merge status? Daniel Berlin
14:12 LNO merge status? Dan Kegel
13:47 Re: IBM Sponsoring Release Management Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
13:40 Question about constraints and reload Steven Bosscher
13:22 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Ben Elliston
12:51 Re: -mtune != -march (>=) - optimizing for a higher architecture Paul Brook
11:54 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Steven Bosscher
11:44 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Zdenek Dvorak
11:39 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Ben Elliston
11:31 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Zdenek Dvorak
11:26 loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Ben Elliston
11:14 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Paolo Bonzini
10:54 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Giovanni Bajo
09:06 -mtune != -march (>=) - optimizing for a higher architecture Tom Alsberg
07:51 Dwarf2 maybe broken in the last two weeks on mainline on MinGW Aaron W. LaFramboise
05:54 Re: Re: Richard Henderson
04:33 Re: Metabug for patches waiting for GCC 4.1 Ramana Radhakrishnan
02:59 Re: Re: Daniel Berlin
02:38 Re: Re: Dale Johannesen

September 24, 2004
23:37 gcc-3.4-20040924 is now available gccadmin
23:12 Re: IBM Sponsoring Release Management Kurt Wall
22:34 IBM Sponsoring Release Management Mark Mitchell
22:29 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Mark Mitchell
22:15 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
22:06 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Robert Dewar
21:50 Re: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Mike Stump
21:47 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Mark Mitchell
21:45 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
21:39 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Mark Mitchell
20:50 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Joseph S. Myers
20:36 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Tom Tromey
20:32 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Scott Robert Ladd
20:29 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
20:20 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
20:05 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Laurent GUERBY
19:51 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Devang Patel
19:39 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
19:13 Re: -ansi, POSIX etc basic questions? Kurt Wall
19:07 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
19:06 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) Geert Bosch
19:02 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
18:53 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Andrew Pinski
18:50 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Joseph S. Myers
18:43 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Devang Patel
18:23 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Andrew Pinski
18:16 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Caroline Tice
16:55 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
16:19 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
16:16 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
16:01 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
15:57 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
15:29 Re: [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Ulrich Weigand
14:45 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
14:26 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
14:17 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Andrew Pinski
14:03 SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
13:48 [PATCH] Re: Passing -auxbase to cc1 thru gcc Clifford Wolf
12:24 Metabug for patches waiting for GCC 4.1 Giovanni Bajo
11:29 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
11:23 -ansi, POSIX etc basic questions? Phil Prentice
09:17 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Joseph S. Myers
08:46 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Joseph S. Myers
08:40 [ObjC] Module /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libobjc/Protocol.m version 0 doesn't match runtime 8 Christian Joensson
08:40 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Nathan Sidwell
08:36 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Paolo Bonzini
08:36 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Joseph S. Myers
08:33 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Joseph S. Myers
08:27 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Andreas Schwab
08:25 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Andreas Schwab
06:56 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
06:52 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Geoffrey Keating
06:46 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
06:38 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg
06:31 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Geoffrey Keating
06:20 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins? Uros Bizjak
06:17 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
04:58 Re: [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Jeffrey A Law
04:18 Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:17 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Mathieu Malaterre
03:41 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Giovanni Bajo
03:04 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
02:59 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
02:55 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
02:46 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
02:43 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Giovanni Bajo
02:39 Re: c pending sizes obsolete Andrew Pinski
02:35 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Giovanni Bajo
02:35 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
02:35 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
02:34 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
02:34 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
02:33 Re: c pending sizes obsolete Zack Weinberg
02:30 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
02:27 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. David Edelsohn
02:27 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
02:22 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Giovanni Bajo
02:20 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg
02:14 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Gabriel Dos Reis
02:14 c pending sizes obsolete Mike Stump
02:13 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Gabriel Dos Reis
02:08 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
02:03 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Steve Naroff
01:47 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
01:45 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
01:40 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Matt Austern
01:40 #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
01:36 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg
01:30 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Zack Weinberg
01:21 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Brad Roberts
01:19 PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
00:47 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
00:34 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Ian Lance Taylor
00:15 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Joseph S. Myers
00:12 [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Ulrich Weigand
00:12 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Paul Koning
00:09 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Ben Elliston
00:05 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Andrew Pinski

September 23, 2004
23:55 attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
23:04 Possible bug in gimplify.c:mostly_copy_tree_r with SAVE_EXPR Richard Kenner
22:41 Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
21:40 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
21:00 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
20:13 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Richard Henderson
20:04 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Toon Moene
19:41 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Mark Mitchell
19:38 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) Geert Bosch
18:57 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Joseph S. Myers
18:42 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
18:12 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) Geert Bosch
16:49 Re: Scimark 2.0 LU.c regression - matrices Giovanni Bajo
16:31 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
16:11 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Joe Buck
16:01 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
15:48 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Richard Kenner
15:45 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Graham Stott
15:11 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Tobias Schlüter
14:31 Scimark 2.0 LU.c regression - matrices Uros Bizjak
12:31 RE: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Andrew Haley
12:29 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X10.2.8) Andreas Schwab
12:14 RE: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Dave Korn
12:11 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions ofcompiler runtime environment? Arora, Sudhanshu
11:53 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Kelley Cook
11:49 VIRUS RE: Re: My details admin
11:38 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
11:35 RE: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Dave Korn
09:24 Re: df.c and cond_exec question Steven Bosscher
08:48 Re: Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Eric Botcazou
07:54 Re: Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Timothy Borgeaud
03:45 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jeffrey A Law
02:50 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Bradley Lucier
02:12 Re: New failures in libstdc++ on x86-64? Giovanni Bajo
01:40 Re: df.c and cond_exec question Richard Henderson
01:39 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Kenner
01:37 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Henderson
01:31 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Kenner
01:29 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Henderson

September 22, 2004
23:58 df.c and cond_exec question Steve Ellcey
23:16 gcc-3.3-20040922 is now available gccadmin
22:54 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Mathieu Malaterre
21:56 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Andreas Schwab
21:46 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? Mark Mitchell
21:36 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
21:24 Re: Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Eric Botcazou
20:50 Re: segfault in compute_transp() Steven Bosscher
20:48 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? Mark Mitchell
20:46 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Andrew Pinski
20:46 Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Jeffrey A Law
20:41 Re: segfault in compute_transp() Daniel Bayer
20:38 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Luca Masini
19:46 New failures in libstdc++ on x86-64? Diego Novillo
19:08 Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Kenner
18:52 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Geoffrey Keating
18:46 Re: sizeof(union) and #pragma pack() Geoffrey Keating
18:45 Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
18:37 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Clifford Wolf
18:37 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Geoffrey Keating
18:34 Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Ulrich Weigand
17:56 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
17:49 Comments on Patching GCC Scott Robert Ladd
17:48 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Ian Lance Taylor
17:45 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
17:34 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Ian Lance Taylor
17:27 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
17:20 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
17:17 RE: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Dave Korn
16:59 Re: g++: exceptions thrown from asm declarations Richard Henderson
16:53 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Richard Henderson
16:43 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Morten Welinder
16:42 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
16:33 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Paul Koning
16:31 How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windowshost? E. Weddington
16:18 RE: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Dave Korn
16:17 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Morten Welinder
16:15 Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Timothy Borgeaud
15:51 Re: Build problem on ia64 H. J. Lu
15:38 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Robert Dewar
15:36 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Robert Dewar
15:12 Re: Fortran array format [Was: Scalar Replacement] Paul Brook
14:57 Re: Scalar Replacement Steven Bosscher
14:50 Scalar Replacement Canqun Yang
14:35 RE: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Thomas R. Truscott
14:16 Passing -auxbase to cc1 thru gcc Clifford Wolf
13:45 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Robert Dewar
13:39 RE: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Dave Korn
13:22 g++: exceptions thrown from asm declarations Stephan Bergmann
13:20 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
11:42 Description of .eh_frame/.gcc_except_table contents? Stephan Bergmann
10:38 Re: Change of behaviour, or something broke in cin/streambuf behaviour between 3.3.4 and 3.4.1? Andrew Walrond
10:03 Re: Build problem on ia64 Paolo Carlini
10:00 Re: Change of behaviour, or something broke in cin/streambuf behaviourbetween 3.3.4 and 3.4.1? Paolo Carlini
10:00 Build problem on ia64 Zdenek Dvorak
09:38 Change of behaviour, or something broke in cin/streambuf behaviour between 3.3.4 and 3.4.1? Andrew Walrond
08:45 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Paolo Bonzini
06:04 Re: Set binutils version to 2.15.92 for COMDAT group Mark Mitchell
05:33 GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Mark Mitchell
05:22 sizeof(union) and #pragma pack() Dave Trollope, Diane Barrowman
04:34 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Roger Sayle
01:21 Re: Is this a bug in the folder? Diego Novillo
01:15 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Eric Christopher
00:35 Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Mathieu Malaterre

September 21, 2004
23:09 Re: Register Allocation tm_gccmail
22:36 Re: #pragma redefine_extname and local declarations Mark Mitchell
21:13 Register Allocation Adrian Strätling
20:56 Re: Yet another java bootstrap failure Andreas Tobler
20:52 Yet another java bootstrap failure Matt Austern
18:56 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Ranjit Mathew
18:48 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Linus Torvalds
18:39 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Ian Lance Taylor
18:30 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Nick Gianakas
18:26 signed vs unsigned pointer warning Richard Henderson
18:22 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Zack Weinberg
18:14 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Matt Austern
17:59 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue Daniel Berlin
17:44 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Frank Ch. Eigler
16:11 Re: Is this a bug in the folder? Roger Sayle
16:09 Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Tobias Schlüter
16:04 Re: segfault in compute_transp() Steven Bosscher
16:01 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue Vladimir Makarov
15:55 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Ian Lance Taylor
15:47 Re: #pragma redefine_extname and local declarations Joseph S. Myers
15:41 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Nick Gianakas
15:37 segfault in compute_transp() Daniel Bayer
15:35 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue Vladimir Makarov
15:29 Is this a bug in the folder? Diego Novillo
15:13 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Nathan Sidwell
15:12 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Ian Lance Taylor
15:08 Mixed-mode assembler Nick Gianakas
15:05 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Andreas Schwab
14:49 Re: Detecting and optimising byte swaping operations in words Giovanni Bajo
14:29 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Giovanni Bajo
14:10 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Robert Dewar
13:30 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Daniel Jacobowitz
13:26 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Giovanni Bajo
12:40 Detecting and optimising byte swaping operations in words K . G .
12:39 Successful build and check results of gcc-3.3.4 on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 Julian R. Parramore
10:26 Warning in 3_4 docs Paolo Carlini
09:34 An error in http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html Li, Jing (Fred)
09:24 RE: Please *bootstrap* patches Andreas Tobler
09:18 Please *bootstrap* patches Steven Bosscher
09:03 Re: DR handling for C++ Joseph S. Myers
08:43 Successful build of gcc-3.3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 Julian R. Parramore
08:28 Successful build of gcc-3.3.4 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 Julian R. Parramore
07:59 RE: Bootstrap broken in Mainline Andreas Tobler
07:57 Bootstrap broken in Mainline Andreas Jaeger
07:53 How to disable double and long double? Petar Penchev
07:21 Re: DR handling for C++ Paolo Bonzini
05:55 Re: suggestion for C/C++ warning Jakub Jelinek
05:18 suggestion for C/C++ warning William Brodie-Tyrrell
03:34 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Jeffrey A Law
00:13 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue tm_gccmail

September 20, 2004
23:42 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Scott Robert Ladd
23:31 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Steven Bosscher
23:16 #pragma redefine_extname and local declarations Mark Mitchell
23:12 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Scott Robert Ladd
22:59 Re: DR handling for C++ Joseph S. Myers
22:32 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
21:41 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
21:36 Re: DR handling for C++ Matt Austern
21:26 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
21:14 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 Re: DR handling for C++ Matt Austern
21:07 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:04 Re: DR handling for C++ Dale Johannesen
21:01 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
21:00 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
20:55 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:54 Re: DR handling for C++ Matt Austern
20:47 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
20:44 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
20:44 Re: DR handling for C++ Andrew Pinski
20:41 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:34 Re: DR handling for C++ Dale Johannesen
20:04 DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
19:51 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Devang Patel
19:43 Re: Peeling loops at tree level?, Lno branch merge patches ping Richard Henderson
19:04 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:45 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:38 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:29 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Toon Moene
18:22 Re: Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extension induced problem -- bug 9737) Tyson Whitehead
17:48 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Jeffrey A Law
17:47 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Eric Christopher
17:41 Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:52 Re: Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extension induced problem -- bug 9737) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:25 Re: number of vector template instances and pointers Joe Buck
16:11 Re: Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extensioninduced problem -- bug 9737) Wolfgang Bangerth
15:40 Re: Version 0.0 of binutils is unsurprisingly feature-poor Paolo Bonzini
15:39 Re: [wwwdocs] tree-cleanup-branch created Diego Novillo
15:16 Re: Version 0.0 of binutils is unsurprisingly feature-poor Zack Weinberg
14:56 Re: number of vector template instances and pointers Dan Kegel
13:57 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Nathan Sidwell
13:51 RE: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Dave Korn
13:45 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
13:31 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Paul Koning
12:12 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:40 Version 0.0 of binutils is unsurprisingly feature-poor (was Re: Regression for csl-arm on arm-none-elf) Phil Edwards
10:36 Interesting paper from Perdue Steven Bosscher
09:07 Re: error Nathan Sidwell
08:51 Re: Assembly code generated Paolo Bonzini
08:15 Assembly code generated .jareeN.
07:37 Re: Need info on C Macro Paolo Bonzini
07:14 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Ralf Corsepius
07:11 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Kai Henningsen
05:44 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm tm_gccmail
04:27 Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extension induced problem -- bug 9737) Tyson Whitehead
03:51 Re: varargs Dave Trollope, Diane Barrowman
00:54 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Dale Johannesen
00:31 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar

September 19, 2004
22:41 varargs Paul Harmon
21:12 Re: Quadratic behavior due to tree-cfg.c:tree_redirect_edge_and_branch Steven Bosscher
21:04 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Timothy J . Wood
20:56 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
20:53 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
20:34 Quadratic behavior due to tree-cfg.c:tree_redirect_edge_and_branch Steven Bosscher
20:25 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Zack Weinberg
19:55 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Timothy J . Wood
19:31 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
19:17 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
19:14 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
18:41 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
18:34 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
18:00 gcc-4.0-20040919 is now available gccadmin
17:41 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Kai Henningsen
17:08 An illustration of how bad the DOM memory regression is Steven Bosscher
16:02 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
14:55 Re: How useful is the web pass on targets other than x86/amd64? Jan Hubicka
14:23 error Anton Feldmann
14:07 why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
14:02 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Jeremy Sanders
13:12 How useful is the web pass on targets other than x86/amd64? Steven Bosscher
12:18 Info on "asm out" Theoharis Tsenis
11:50 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Marc Espie
11:38 Need info on C Macro Monojit Roy
08:24 Prerelease tarballs of GCC-3.3.5 (second iteration) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:39 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
00:08 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Kaveh R. Ghazi

September 18, 2004
23:46 Re: [wwwdocs] tree-cleanup-branch created Gerald Pfeifer
23:19 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:35 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
21:21 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Natros
20:48 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
20:42 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Andi Kleen
18:37 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Adrian Strätling
18:26 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Giovanni Bajo
17:33 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
17:31 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Richard Guenther
17:10 Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
16:52 Re: template function specialization trouble - probably a user error, but... Alexandre Oliva
16:51 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Alexandre Oliva
15:14 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
14:43 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
14:36 [wwwdocs] tree-cleanup-branch created Diego Novillo
13:05 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Kai Henningsen
11:02 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
10:46 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Richard Kenner
10:43 Re: Ada status 20040917 Richard Kenner
09:16 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Paolo Bonzini
06:23 Paid Search! czy
03:08 Re: Critical edge splitting inconsistency Daniel Berlin
01:52 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
00:48 Build/test report for gcc 3.4.2 on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu Kaz Kojima

September 17, 2004
23:38 Re: Error on GCC 3.4 release web page Giovanni Bajo
23:35 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Giovanni Bajo
23:31 gcc-3.4-20040917 is now available gccadmin
22:35 RE: Error on GCC 3.4 release web page Johan Bergman (KI/EAB)
22:07 Error on GCC 3.4 release web page Johan Bergman (KI/EAB)
21:44 Critical edge splitting inconsistency Jan Hubicka
21:34 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
21:24 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
21:12 Re: Slightly different Ada RTS build verify_ssa error Laurent GUERBY
20:52 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
20:40 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
19:57 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
19:54 Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
19:27 Ada status 20040917 Laurent GUERBY
18:51 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Gabriel Dos Reis
18:28 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL Mike Stump
18:15 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Mark Mitchell
18:02 Re: SuperH patch contributions Andrew Cagney
17:43 Re: HAVE_GAS_COMDAT_GROUP problem (GCC Head) Simon MARTIN
16:44 Re: mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Benjamin Kosnik
16:39 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
16:38 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Benjamin Kosnik
16:30 Re: template function specialization trouble - probably a user error,but... Nathan Sidwell
16:13 Re: template function specialization trouble - probably a user error, but... Alexandre Oliva
16:07 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Alexandre Oliva
16:06 Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Toon Moene
15:50 SuperH patch contributions Joern Rennecke
15:39 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Nathan Sidwell
15:32 Build success for gcc 3.4.2 on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
15:16 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
14:50 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Ian Lance Taylor
14:45 A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
14:16 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL Daniel Jacobowitz
14:13 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Jamie Lokier
14:10 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Steven Bosscher
14:01 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Jeffrey A Law
13:46 Re: Ada: prj-attr-pm.ads/b missing in FSF CVS Arnaud Charlet
13:44 R