This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Undefined static functions

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Richard Henderson wrote:

> > ... defining TREE_NO_WARNING to apply 
> > to decls as well as expressions looks safer.
> 
> TREE_NO_WARNING *does* apply to decls.  See warn_uninit in tree-ssa.c.

So the documentation in tree.h of

   nowarning_flag:

       TREE_NO_WARNING in
           ... any expr node

and

/* In an expr node (usually a conversion) this means the node was made
   implicitly and should not lead to any sort of warning.  */

needs updating to reflect this.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
  http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/#c90status - status of C90 for GCC 3.5
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]