This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())

From: Grigory Tolstolytkin <gtolstolytkin at dev dot rtsoft dot ru>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:34:44 +0400
Subject: Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
References: <412DF8A0.6020807@dev.rtsoft.ru> <012201c48b96$b1daac70$e7b82997@bagio> <412EFC6D.9050601@dev.rtsoft.ru> <001a01c48c22$d50cd060$df4e2a97@bagio>

Giovanni Bajo wrote:

Yes, I meant create a new bug report, and add the testcase, a link to the patch
(to the html page from the mailing list archives) and your new testcase. But
can you try with FSF's latest release, 3.3.4? If it cannot be reproduced there,
there is no point in applying the patch.

Sorry for my delay. I tried my testcase with the FSF release 3.3.4 and the bug wasn't reproduced, so as I understand there is no need to apply the patch.

Thanks
Grigory Tolstolytkin

References:
- gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
  - From: Grigory Tolstolytkin
- Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
  - From: Grigory Tolstolytkin
- Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]