This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gfortran test runs

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>, Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:03:47 -0700
Subject: Re: gfortran test runs
References: <1093439260.5415.1257.camel@p4> <20040825134546.GA26416@nevyn.them.org> <1093442437.13982.1335.camel@p4> <1093448278.22129.21.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <412D04A5.1080407@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20040825145546.A22480@synopsys.com> <1093514288.22129.63.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:58:09AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> What I don't understand, given the ample precedent for doing this with
> other packages, is why we can't just add the gmp source to the compiler
> as an imported package, in the same way we do intl and zlib (and
> probably other things).  Then if the system doesn't provide a suitable
> gmp we just build our own and link it in directly.

Certainly no one objects.  It just hasn't been done yet.


r~

References:
- gfortran test runs
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: gfortran test runs
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: gfortran test runs
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: gfortran test runs
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: gfortran test runs
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: gfortran test runs
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: gfortran test runs
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]