This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Have assert macros

From: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:09:47 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
References: <412A49D5.2070809@codesourcery.com> <412BC054.7060409@codesourcery.com> <80D78010-F61E-11D8-98C1-000A95D7CD40@apple.com> <87fz6c87e8.fsf@codesourcery.com>

On Aug 24, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:

Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com> writes:
Redefining abort is undefined behavior in C89 (4.1.2.1, footnote 91).
Of course we can switch to using gcc_abort, appropriately #define'd.
We're already redefining abort.


I didn't realize.  If everyone is OK with that, I have no objection, but
usually people prefer to be standard-conformant.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- [RFC] Have assert macros
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]