This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Dave Korn <dk at artimi dot com>, "'Roger Sayle'" <roger at eyesopen dot com>, "'Joe Buck'" <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:35:12 -0700
Subject: Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004, at 12:37 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

| > The enum case is more like NaNs
|
| ?  Can you please back this by citing the standard?

7.2/6
  For an enumeration where emin is the smallest enumerator and emax is

Let me try it a different way... I am skeptical that taking additional advantage of rules that exist in C++ and not C is wise. Everything else flows from that.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]