This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004


 > >icc -E -dM -O3 -xN qq.c | grep INLINE
 > #define __NO_MATH_INLINES 1
 > #define __NO_STRING_INLINES 1
 > #define __NO_INLINE__ 1


Well, I for one think this is *highly* unfair. :-)
If icc gets to avoid using glibc's macros, then so should we!

So my other question remains, did Jakub's patch get all the cases
where GCC does a better job than glibc?  If the benchmarks are
compiled with the above defines, does gcc's score get better on any of
the tests?  (Sorry, I don't have access to run it myself.)

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]