This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
Compiled with -march=opteron, GCC 3.5 has a perfect paranoia score.
Adding -O3 does *not* introduce any errors on the Opteron; adding
-ffast-math results in a *single* minor "flaw".
A minor clarification:
*BOTH* GCC 3.4 and 3.5 achieve a perfect score on the Opteron, with or
without any -O? optimization switch. When -ffast-math (actually,
-funsafe-math-optimizations) is added, GCC 3.4 gains a single flaw,
while 3.5 gains one defect and two flaws. I'll try to track this down
and report it as a regression against 3.5.
--
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing
- References:
- GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004