This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>,Marcel Cox <cimetmc at myrealbox dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:39:00 -0400
Subject: Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
References: <411F794B.8090704@coyotegulch.com> <003201c48301$964dbee0$51b82997@bagio> <4120D634.9010004@coyotegulch.com> <cftijb$8g4$1@sea.gmane.org> <41226B9A.4010504@coyotegulch.com> <41229862.2080108@gnat.com> <20040817172153.B2064@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck wrote:

icc's good performance on Kahan's Paranoia benchmark is surprising given
that it makes obviously unsafe floating point transformations; a
reasonable conclusion is that its developers were asked for both a good
Paranoia score and good floating point performance, and they cut corners,
but took care not to break Paranoia.

Such cynicism! :-) :-) :-)

References:
- GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
  - From: Marcel Cox
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]