This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 04 14:59:51 EDT
- Subject: Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH
Ah, so the problem is not out of the gimplifier, but out of the
nested function lowering? Maybe.
Maybe, as you say. But .t04.generic has
F36b = c761006_2__adj_checkDA (F36b, &another_target, 1);
which already might be wrong depending on the definition of "wrong".
I'll try to build a smaller test case to see if I can reproduce this.
Thanks.