This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
To: Olivier Hainque <hainque at act-europe dot fr>
Cc: James E Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:48:17 +1000
Subject: Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
References: <20040806101141.A5845@rome.act-europe.fr> <41156A18.7030400@specifixinc.com> <20040810142648.A17934@rome.act-europe.fr> <20040812150540.A17744@rome.act-europe.fr>

Olivier Hainque wrote:

 It unfortunately has a consequence which seems undesireable to me: we get
 different code depending on whether -g is provided or not.


Seriously unacceptable. It is a crucial guarantee that -g NEVER
should change the generated code.

Is that indeed a valid concern ?

References:
- O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
  - From: Olivier Hainque

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]