gcc archive
date index for August, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2004
23:58 Re: IA64 floating point division question Steve Ellcey
23:55 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Andrew Pinski
23:52 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Joe Buck
23:45 Re: IA64 floating point division question Zack Weinberg
23:20 Re: Undefined static functions Mark Mitchell
23:15 TREE_READONLY on SAVE_EXPR Richard Kenner
22:50 Re: Libgfortran licensing Mike Stump
22:46 IA64 floating point division question Steve Ellcey
22:20 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:19 Re: Libgfortran licensing Tobias Schlüter
22:19 Re: Libgfortran licensing Toon Moene
22:16 Re: Libgfortran licensing Robert Dewar
22:14 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:11 Re: Libgfortran licensing Paul Brook
22:11 Re: Libgfortran licensing Robert Dewar
22:06 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:02 Re: Libgfortran licensing Toon Moene
22:01 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
21:54 Re: Ada policy Kai Henningsen
21:50 Re: Ada policy Geoffrey Keating
21:40 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Harald Dunkel
21:11 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Geoff Keating
21:04 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
21:03 Re: Libgfortran licensing Mike Stump
20:56 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
20:56 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Steve Ellcey
20:53 Re: Compile-time and execution-time impact of CSE - some numbers Paolo Bonzini
20:44 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
20:37 Re: Undefined static functions Joseph S. Myers
20:34 Re: Ada policy Scott Robert Ladd
20:33 Re: Undefined static functions Richard Henderson
20:32 Re: Is this a bug in doloop.c? James E Wilson
20:26 Re: Mainline space problem Daniel Berlin
20:21 Libgfortran licensing Tobias Schlüter
20:11 Re: Mainline space problem Robert Dewar
20:05 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
20:04 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Richard Henderson
19:55 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
19:36 Re: Ada policy Scott Robert Ladd
19:30 Re: automatic casting Tom Tromey
19:28 question on class layout with virtual base classes Yan Liu
19:27 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
19:18 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Mike Stump
19:02 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
18:59 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Joern Rennecke
18:55 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... James E Wilson
18:53 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:45 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:44 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:43 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Daniel Jacobowitz
18:42 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
18:40 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Richard Kenner
18:39 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Harald Dunkel
18:37 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:37 Re: Mainline space problem Daniel Berlin
18:34 Re: Mainline space problem Joern Rennecke
18:33 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Richard Sandiford
18:30 RE: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Dave Korn
18:28 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha James E Wilson
18:19 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
18:10 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
18:06 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Joern Rennecke
17:57 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Steve Ellcey
17:55 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
17:35 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
16:56 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Janis Johnson
16:34 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Grigory Tolstolytkin
16:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joseph S. Myers
15:55 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Joe Buck
15:54 Option to compile for both AMD64 and EM64T? Justin Palmer
15:36 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
15:27 Re: Cross_compiler error!HELP ME Dan Kegel
15:10 Re: Mainline space problem Jeffrey A Law
15:02 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
14:48 Re: GNU libobjc on Darwin David Edelsohn
14:41 Re: Ada policy Gabriel Dos Reis
14:39 Re: Ada policy Gabriel Dos Reis
13:57 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Zdenek Dvorak
13:52 Re: automatic casting Diego Novillo
13:50 Re: Compile-time and execution-time impact of CSE - some numbers Steven Bosscher
13:47 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
13:29 Compile-time and execution-time impact of CSE - some numbers Paolo Bonzini
13:22 On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Steven Bosscher
13:10 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
13:08 Re: Release criteria Robert Dewar
13:06 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
13:03 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
13:01 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
12:55 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
12:53 Re: automatic casting Paolo Bonzini
12:49 automatic casting kartick Vaddadi
12:48 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
11:24 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
11:00 Need Help Kolingba Arthur
10:55 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
10:49 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
10:46 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30on MICO sources Paolo Bonzini
10:44 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
10:34 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
10:28 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
10:24 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Paolo Bonzini
10:12 Funnies about C++ parsing - unhelpful error messages Richard Guenther
09:58 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
09:42 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Arnaud Charlet
09:41 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
09:11 Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30on MICO sources Karel Gardas
09:00 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Arnaud Charlet
08:49 Release criteria (was: Ada policy) Gerald Pfeifer
08:31 Re: Undefined static functions Joseph S. Myers
08:25 Re: Cross_compiler error!HELP ME Zack Weinberg
08:16 Cross_compiler error!HELP ME Daniel Yu
07:38 Re: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Alan Modra
06:02 Re: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Jakub Jelinek
05:27 Re: Ada policy Per Bothner
05:04 Re: binds_local question Richard Henderson
05:01 Re: Undefined static functions Richard Henderson
04:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Eric Botcazou
04:51 GNU libobjc on Darwin Bill Northcott
04:38 Re: Ada policy Matt Austern
04:28 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Michael Chastain
04:22 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Mark Mitchell
04:07 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
04:05 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Michael Chastain
04:05 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:56 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:41 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
03:34 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
03:31 Re: Mainline space problem Daniel Berlin
03:29 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
03:28 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
03:25 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
03:22 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:17 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Devang Patel
03:00 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
02:59 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
02:54 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
02:50 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
02:37 Re: Ada policy Mike Stump
02:10 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
01:57 Re: binds_local question Mike Stump
01:25 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
01:13 Re: Is this a bug in doloop.c? James E Wilson
01:13 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
01:06 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
00:48 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
00:33 Re: binds_local question Daniel Jacobowitz
00:28 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin James E Wilson
00:14 Re: number of spills and reloads James E Wilson
00:13 binds_local question Mike Stump
00:11 Undefined static functions Joseph S. Myers

August 30, 2004
23:09 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
23:06 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
23:01 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Andrew Pinski
23:00 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
23:00 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
22:56 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:55 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:52 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:52 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:48 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:43 Re: Ada policy Mike Stump
22:38 Re: Ada policy Mike Stump
22:34 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
22:31 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:30 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:28 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:25 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:18 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
22:02 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:01 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
21:53 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
21:49 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
21:41 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
21:30 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
21:24 Re: Release numbering Joseph S. Myers
21:18 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
21:05 Re: Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Laurent GUERBY
21:04 Re: Ada policy Diego Novillo
21:02 Re: Release numbering [--enable-mapped-location] Per Bothner
20:57 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
20:57 Re: Ada policy Richard Henderson
20:55 Re: Release numbering Zack Weinberg
20:53 Re: Minimal FDE Richard Henderson
20:47 Re: Release numbering Per Bothner
20:46 Re: Ada policy Richard Guenther
20:34 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
20:25 Re: Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Richard Kenner
20:14 Re: Release numbering Phil Edwards
20:04 Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Laurent GUERBY
20:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Laurent GUERBY
19:28 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Florian Weimer
18:42 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jakub Jelinek
18:38 Minimal FDE Yaakov Yaari
18:28 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
18:08 Re: Release numbering Joseph S. Myers
18:02 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Richard Henderson
18:02 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Laurent GUERBY
17:46 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mike Stump
17:44 proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Geoff Keating
17:08 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joe Buck
17:01 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jeffrey A Law
16:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
15:29 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Diego Novillo
15:21 Re: [RFC]: Removal of libbanshee and tree-alias-* from mainline Diego Novillo
15:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
15:11 Re: Complex log builtins Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
15:05 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
15:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:54 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
14:48 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:42 Re: Release numbering Steven Bosscher
14:33 Re: Release numbering Jeffrey A Law
14:26 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: Release numbering David Edelsohn
14:16 Re: Complex log builtins Paul Brook
13:51 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
13:05 Re: Release numbering Robert Dewar
12:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
11:27 Speeding up C++ at -O0 (Was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Giovanni Bajo
11:24 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jakub Jelinek
11:04 Re: Release numbering Laurent GUERBY
11:02 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Laurent GUERBY
10:50 Re: Release numbering Florian Weimer
10:45 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing Gerald Pfeifer
10:44 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Paolo Bonzini
10:26 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Dorit Naishlos
10:22 Re: Release numbering Steven Bosscher
10:19 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Richard Kenner
10:17 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
10:16 Re: Release numbering Gabriel Dos Reis
10:13 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
10:11 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Richard Kenner
10:11 Re: [RFC] Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak
10:04 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Giovanni Bajo
10:03 Re: Release numbering Richard Kenner
09:24 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joseph S. Myers
08:15 Re: Release numbering Phil Edwards
07:34 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
07:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
07:06 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
06:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
05:30 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
05:27 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen H. J. Lu
05:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
04:43 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:33 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
04:17 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:11 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
04:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Nathanael Nerode
03:55 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:32 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
03:20 Re: Release numbering Gabriel Dos Reis
03:14 Re: Release numbering Gabriel Dos Reis
03:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
03:03 Mainline space problem Bradley Lucier
03:01 Re: Complex log builtins Gabriel Dos Reis
02:46 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Matt Austern
02:41 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
02:34 segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Alan Modra
01:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Giovanni Bajo
01:53 Re: Complex log builtins Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:51 [RFC]: Removal of libbanshee and tree-alias-* from mainline Daniel Berlin
01:29 Re: Release numbering Phil Edwards
01:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
01:09 Release numbering Richard Kenner
01:04 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
00:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Andrew Pinski
00:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
00:53 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
00:48 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Richard Kenner
00:33 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
00:25 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
00:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell

August 29, 2004
23:52 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
23:49 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
23:40 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Andrew Pinski
23:21 Re: text for AT&T style 386 asm syntax as used by GCC Randy.Dunlap
23:17 GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
22:30 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
22:26 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen H. J. Lu
21:46 GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Mark Mitchell
19:47 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
18:09 gcc-3.5-20040829 is now available gccadmin
18:07 GCC 3.4 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
16:51 Query on Pentium-M performance Robert Dewar
15:47 Lettre-message de b.ecologie@free.fr b dot ecologie at free dot fr
14:30 Re: Complex log builtins Gabriel Dos Reis
12:07 text for AT&T style 386 asm syntax as used by GCC Robert Dewar
11:14 Complex log builtins Paul Brook
10:01 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos

August 28, 2004
18:15 RE: Broken link and defunct search Gerald Pfeifer
17:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andreas Schwab
16:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:44 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:04 s390 bootstrap broken on mainline Andreas Jaeger
15:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Michael Matz
15:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andreas Schwab
14:33 Re: Any recommendation for an expert on RTL? Mike Stump
14:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
14:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
13:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Michael Matz
09:05 Re: Breaking up loop.c Steven Bosscher
05:20 Breaking up loop.c Gustavo Ribeiro Alves
03:01 volunteering to maintain the FR-V port Alexandre Oliva

August 27, 2004
23:54 Re: gcc -fsingle-precision-constant Phil Edwards
23:35 gcc-3.4-20040827 is now available gccadmin
22:49 Re: program compiled with -ftrapv aborts in std::queue<>.size() Falk Hueffner
22:49 Any recommendation for an expert on RTL? Chunhua Liao
22:41 program compiled with -ftrapv aborts in std::queue<>.size() Mathieu Malaterre
22:23 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joseph S. Myers
22:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:13 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
22:02 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:00 gcc -fsingle-precision-constant Mathieu Malaterre
21:59 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
21:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:50 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
21:39 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
21:37 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:26 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ D. Starner
19:10 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Phil Edwards
17:36 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Mike Stump
17:06 Re: Bug in implicit conversion (gcc 3.4.1)? Giovanni Bajo
16:49 RE: Broken link and defunct search Joseph S. Myers
16:41 Facilite sua vida ou Empresa Carolina
15:06 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Richard Earnshaw
14:52 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Paolo Bonzini
14:18 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Andrew MacLeod
14:13 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Diego Novillo
13:59 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Richard Kenner
13:26 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Diego Novillo
12:30 Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Richard Guenther
11:58 Ada build status Richard Kenner
10:44 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Giovanni Bajo
09:52 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk tobuild Fortran Richard Earnshaw
09:18 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Grigory Tolstolytkin
08:57 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Segher Boessenkool
08:45 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Andreas Schwab
05:46 Re: compiles under g++ but not gcc sol
05:18 Re: compiles under g++ but not gcc Zack Weinberg
04:47 compiles under g++ but not gcc sol
03:56 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Roland Dreier
03:07 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
01:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:28 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis

August 26, 2004
23:52 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Joseph S. Myers
23:46 varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Roland Dreier
23:14 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
23:03 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
22:26 mudflap vs. varargs Frank Ch. Eigler
22:21 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
21:47 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
21:42 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Clif Smith
21:39 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Phil Edwards
21:34 WANTED OKUMA LU-15 Paul Arbour
21:34 WANTED OKUMA LU-15 Paul Arbour
21:21 RE: Broken link and defunct search Gerald Pfeifer
21:08 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
21:08 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
21:04 Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Clif Smith
19:01 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Richard Sandiford
18:03 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Henderson
18:01 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Giovanni Bajo
17:34 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Paul Brook
17:31 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
17:10 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk tobuild Fortran Diego Novillo
17:06 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
16:19 RE: GCC Project Help ! Dave Korn
16:05 GCC Project Help ! Manoj Pillai
15:03 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Paul Brook
14:50 gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Grigory Tolstolytkin
14:03 Bug in implicit conversion (gcc 3.4.1)? Boris von Loesch
13:17 Re: gcc/gcc fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-decl.c ... Tobias Schlüter
12:51 Re: gcc/gcc fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-decl.c ... Joseph S. Myers
11:31 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Michael Chastain
11:02 Re: gfortran test runs Geert Bosch
09:58 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Earnshaw
09:29 Re: number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start Zdenek Dvorak
09:04 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Nathan Sidwell
08:46 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin Tal Agmon
07:03 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Richard E Collins
05:45 Re: number of spills and reloads Qiong Cai
03:41 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Daniel Berlin
03:37 Re: number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start Daniel Berlin
03:37 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Daniel Berlin
03:33 Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Andrew Pinski
03:23 number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start Andrew Pinski
00:42 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
00:34 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Daniel Jacobowitz
00:31 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
00:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
00:13 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
00:11 Re: gcc porting James E Wilson

August 25, 2004
23:50 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
23:47 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin James E Wilson
23:45 [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
23:43 Re: Inquiry: GCC front-end requirements James E Wilson
23:41 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin Mike Stump
23:37 gcc-3.3-20040825 is now available gccadmin
23:21 Re: number of spills and reloads James E Wilson
22:45 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Steven Bosscher
22:26 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Joe Buck
22:09 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Phil Edwards
21:56 Re: gfortran test runs Joe Buck
21:50 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
21:30 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Andrew Pinski
21:26 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Gerald Pfeifer
21:24 Re: gfortran test runs Toon Moene
21:18 GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
21:08 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Andrew Pinski
21:04 issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
20:03 Is this a bug in doloop.c? John Lu
18:44 Re: [lno] bootstrap broken Sebastian Pop
18:22 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
18:14 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Richard E Collins
17:38 Re: gfortran test runs Scott Robert Ladd
17:14 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Joe Buck
17:01 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
16:12 Canadian cross on cygwin Tal Agmon
15:53 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Earnshaw
15:49 Re: gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
15:38 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Earnshaw
14:43 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
14:00 Re: gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
13:51 Re: gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
13:45 Re: gfortran test runs Daniel Jacobowitz
13:07 gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
12:22 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
12:01 Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Richard E Collins
11:28 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Dave Korn
10:42 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
10:36 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
10:16 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
10:13 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
10:10 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
10:07 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
10:01 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Falk Hueffner
09:55 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.am includes Florian Weimer
09:54 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
09:46 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
09:05 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Nicholas Nethercote
08:10 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Nathan Sidwell
05:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
05:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andrew Pinski
05:06 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
03:12 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
03:07 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
03:04 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
02:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
02:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:06 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:02 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:40 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
01:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
00:57 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:52 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
00:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Henderson
00:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
00:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
00:30 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:29 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
00:28 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Joseph S. Myers
00:25 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:23 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:21 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Henderson
00:18 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Phil Edwards

August 24, 2004
23:48 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
23:47 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
23:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
23:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Henderson
23:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
23:31 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
23:27 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joseph S. Myers
23:25 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
23:23 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
23:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
23:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
23:09 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Dale Johannesen
23:09 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
23:08 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Zack Weinberg
23:04 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Zack Weinberg
23:04 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
23:00 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
22:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
22:49 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Toon Moene
22:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
22:40 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Dale Johannesen
22:31 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Paul Brook
22:31 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
22:25 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Mark Mitchell
22:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
22:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:10 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
22:03 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
22:00 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
21:59 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Geoff Keating
21:58 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
21:54 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:51 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
21:49 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
21:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
21:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
21:43 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:42 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
21:42 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:39 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
21:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Geoffrey Keating
21:23 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) Mark Mitchell
21:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
21:18 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
21:11 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
20:57 Re: i386: unrecognized insn - "andhi3" pattern Richard Henderson
20:55 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
20:47 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:35 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
20:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
20:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:03 Re: [lno] bootstrap broken Dorit Naishlos
19:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
19:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
19:28 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
19:25 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) Jason Merrill
18:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
18:26 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Dave Korn
18:24 Re: NOTE_INSN_LOOP_VTOP? Jeffrey A Law
18:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
18:13 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time fora toplevel "m4" directory? Nathanael Nerode
18:07 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for atoplevel "m4" directory? Nathanael Nerode
18:07 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Dave Korn
17:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
17:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
17:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Earnshaw
17:51 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
17:43 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
17:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
17:34 Re: gcc porting Mike Stump
17:13 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
17:03 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
15:17 Inquiry: GCC front-end requirements Slawomir Lisznianski
14:04 Re: Several C++ regressions Jason Merrill
13:56 i386: unrecognized insn - "andhi3" pattern Uros Bizjak
10:27 [lno] bootstrap broken Volker Reichelt
08:46 gcc porting Soha Eyal-RM50194
06:53 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Zack Weinberg
06:34 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time fora toplevel "m4" directory? Paolo Bonzini
05:06 Computer training CD's QuickClick Computer Training
04:40 make protoize broken with your changes Andreas Jaeger
02:55 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
02:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
02:25 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi Mark Mitchell
01:01 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Zack Weinberg

August 23, 2004
23:58 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
23:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joseph S. Myers
23:48 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Aldy Hernandez
23:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andrew Pinski
23:28 Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
23:15 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
22:49 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
22:47 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Clifford Wolf
22:35 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:29 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Andreas Schwab
22:21 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Clifford Wolf
21:54 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
21:50 NOTE_INSN_LOOP_VTOP? Mark Mitchell
21:47 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 James E Wilson
21:38 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi Jonathan Wakely
21:02 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) H. J. Lu
20:53 GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) Mark Mitchell
20:52 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Kelley Cook
20:10 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 Andreas Tobler
20:03 Re: How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu? James E Wilson
20:02 Re: GCC Organization Mike Stump
20:00 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 James E Wilson
19:47 [RFC] Have assert macros Nathan Sidwell
19:00 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Andrew MacLeod
18:27 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
18:18 GCC Organization Wagner Luis Nardini
17:34 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:13 Re: Several C++ regressions Zack Weinberg
17:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Marc Espie
16:57 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:43 Re: Several C++ regressions Diego Novillo
16:40 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:39 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
16:36 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
16:31 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Segher Boessenkool
16:30 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:28 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Florian Weimer
16:27 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
16:25 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Andreas Schwab
16:24 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
16:23 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Andreas Schwab
16:21 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Dave Korn
16:15 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
16:08 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:06 Re: Several C++ regressions Phil Edwards
16:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Paul Koning
15:58 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
15:54 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:46 number of spills and reloads Qiong Cai
15:46 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
15:44 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Zack Weinberg
15:42 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:26 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak
14:58 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
14:50 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Segher Boessenkool
14:37 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
14:35 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time fora toplevel "m4" directory? Joseph S. Myers
14:29 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Segher Boessenkool
14:21 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
14:19 Several C++ regressions Diego Novillo
14:17 libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for atoplevel "m4" directory? Kelley Cook
14:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
14:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Florian Weimer
13:58 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
13:36 RE: How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu? Dave Korn
13:33 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:37 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
10:55 Is it possible to compile for another os? Andrew Haley
10:36 Is it possible to compile for another os? julien . finet
10:32 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Paolo Bonzini
07:32 Re: [RFC] Variable Expansion Optimization Revital Eres
07:11 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak

August 22, 2004
23:59 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Zack Weinberg
22:41 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
21:45 Re: [PATCH] for Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Richard Henderson
20:44 Re: [PATCH] for Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Richard Kenner
20:35 [PATCH] for Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Zdenek Dvorak
19:31 Re: [Bug libstdc++/17005] wide character strings don't work on HP John David Anglin
19:03 Re: GCC 3.5 project submissions Mostafa Hagog
18:59 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Marc Espie
17:57 gcc-3.5-20040822 is now available gccadmin
17:35 Re: [Bug libstdc++/17005] wide character strings don't work on HP-UX11i using gcc 3.4.1 Paolo Carlini
15:53 Re: [RFC] Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak
15:44 [RFC] Variable Expansion Optimization Revital Eres
09:54 How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu? Jinag Robert
07:40 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly Mostafa Hagog

August 21, 2004
18:58 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 Mike Stump
18:34 failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 israel evans
16:54 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak
15:25 Re: [Bug libstdc++/17005] wide character strings don't work on HP-UX 11i using gcc 3.4.1 John David Anglin
14:52 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) Peter Barada
10:20 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack Steven Bosscher
10:12 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack Steven Bosscher
09:23 Issues with TYPE_CACHED_VALUES Richard Kenner
06:41 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) Peter Barada
06:24 Jeff Law -- offline for the next week Jeffrey A Law
05:12 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) James E Wilson
01:41 Re: A #pragma visibility warning from gthr.h Paolo Carlini
01:39 Re: Help: want to build automatic .i-based tester for GCC James E Wilson
01:29 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack James E Wilson
00:55 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux James E Wilson
00:46 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux James E Wilson

August 20, 2004
23:51 PATCH Re: A #pragma visibility warning from gthr.h Jason Merrill
23:49 Re: A #pragma visibility warning from gthr.h Jason Merrill
23:36 gcc-3.4-20040820 is now available gccadmin
23:34 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly Steven Bosscher
23:18 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly James E Wilson
22:14 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Diego Novillo
22:05 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Kenner
21:53 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Henderson
21:36 A #pragma visibility warning from gthr.h Paolo Carlini
21:23 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Kenner
21:10 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Henderson
21:07 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Kenner
20:48 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Kenner
20:20 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Henderson
17:30 -Wdefault-bitfield-sign Morten Welinder
17:14 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing Daniel Berlin
16:49 Re: Crashes on PPC VMX tests Mark Mitchell
16:25 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing Joe Buck
15:35 format cheching (was: Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?) Kai Henningsen
15:35 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Kai Henningsen
15:35 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Kai Henningsen
15:06 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly Steven Bosscher
14:52 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly Mostafa Hagog
14:21 Re: Crashes on PPC VMX tests Nathan Sidwell
13:30 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Gareth Pearce
13:10 Re: How to apply gprof on gcc? Ben Elliston
13:00 TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var Richard Kenner
11:27 Re: [development-gcc] GCC 3.5 project submissions (fwd) Ben Elliston
09:13 Re: New libjava failures Nathan Sidwell
09:12 Re: [development-gcc] GCC 3.5 project submissions (fwd) Steven Bosscher
08:41 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Per Abrahamsen
08:03 Re: C++ case value question Nathan Sidwell
07:07 Crashes on PPC VMX tests Mark Mitchell
06:23 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87stack Uros Bizjak
06:04 Re: New libjava failures Ranjit Mathew
06:02 GCC 3.5 project submissions Mark Mitchell
05:29 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
05:28 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) Peter Barada
05:06 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Jie Zhang
04:11 Re: Pointer arithmetic rules in the tree optimizers? Richard Henderson
02:07 Re: Register classes Daniel Berlin
01:57 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing James E Wilson
01:56 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Eddie Kohler
01:53 Re: Register classes James E Wilson
01:31 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly James E Wilson
01:23 Re: Pointer arithmetic rules in the tree optimizers? James E Wilson
01:11 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joe Buck
01:07 Re: problem with your GIMPLE_FORMAL_TEMP change Richard Kenner
01:03 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) James E Wilson
00:11 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Eddie Kohler
00:05 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Florian Weimer
00:02 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joe Buck

August 19, 2004
23:45 Re: problem with your GIMPLE_FORMAL_TEMP change Richard Henderson
23:40 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Eddie Kohler
23:33 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joe Buck
23:25 Re: problem with your GIMPLE_FORMAL_TEMP change Richard Kenner
23:23 Re: problem with your GIMPLE_FORMAL_TEMP change Richard Henderson
23:12 problem with your GIMPLE_FORMAL_TEMP change Richard Kenner
22:58 Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Eddie Kohler
22:57 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Florian Weimer
21:53 New libjava failures Diego Novillo
21:40 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux Gerald Pfeifer
21:35 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux Diego Novillo
21:32 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Janis Johnson
21:31 Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux Laxmi P
21:20 Re: Testglue patch needed to test recent gcc versions Michael Chastain
21:17 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Michael N. Moran
21:14 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Chris Jefferson
20:59 Re: C++ case value question Kai Henningsen
20:59 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Kai Henningsen
20:14 Testglue patch needed to test recent gcc versions Daniel Jacobowitz
18:17 Re: New to GCC Uttam Pawar
17:55 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types. Daniel Berlin
17:39 Re: Register classes Denis Chertykov
17:31 RFT: MIPS libffi patch... David Daney
17:09 Re: Error in stl? Joe Buck
14:50 Re: Error in stl? Anders Fugmann
14:01 Re: Error in stl? Paolo Carlini
13:49 Re: Register classes Daniel Berlin
13:42 Error in stl? Anders Fugmann
13:42 Re: Ada broken on HEAD Arnaud Charlet
13:40 Re: Ada broken on HEAD Richard Kenner
13:23 Ada broken on HEAD Arnaud Charlet
12:56 Re: Register classes Michael Matz
12:38 Re: gcc IN R Paul Brook
12:17 gcc IN R Ben Yip
12:07 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack Florian Weimer
12:03 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87stack Uros Bizjak
09:28 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack Florian Weimer
09:24 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Michael Matz
09:16 Re: [PATCH] Don't lower MIN_EXPR and MAX_EXPR [was Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004] Richard Henderson
09:15 Re: [PATCH] Don't lower MIN_EXPR and MAX_EXPR [was Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004] Richard Henderson
08:38 PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack Uros Bizjak
08:17 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types. Nathan Sidwell
07:46 Re: [PATCH] Don't lower MIN_EXPR and MAX_EXPR [was Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004] Steven Bosscher
07:05 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Paolo Bonzini
07:01 Help: want to build automatic .i-based tester for GCC Paolo Bonzini
06:46 [PATCH] Don't lower MIN_EXPR and MAX_EXPR [was Re: GCC Benchmarks(coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004] Paolo Bonzini
04:28 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Sebastian Pop
01:59 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) Peter Barada
01:42 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Jie Zhang

August 18, 2004
23:39 gcc-3.3-20040818 is now available gccadmin
23:02 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) James E Wilson
22:53 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Devang Patel
22:52 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Devang Patel
22:26 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations James E Wilson
22:13 2004 Summit Proceedings missing René Rebe
22:00 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joe Buck
21:50 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
21:35 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Devang Patel
20:58 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations James E Wilson
20:39 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
20:36 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Devang Patel
20:22 GCC Wiki Daniel Berlin
20:05 Re: issues with rtl vector operators James E Wilson
20:02 Re: C constant expressions proposals Robert Dewar
20:00 Re: C constant expressions proposals Robert Dewar
19:55 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
19:17 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Devang Patel
19:11 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Devang Patel
19:01 Re: issues with rtl vector operators Devang Patel
18:48 Re: darwin bootstrap failure in mainline Richard Henderson
18:45 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types. Richard Henderson
18:40 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Toon Moene
18:25 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Zack Weinberg
18:16 Re: Register classes Daniel Berlin
18:08 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Laurent GUERBY
18:05 Fwd: Register classes Caroline Tice
18:05 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Dave Korn
17:59 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
17:55 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:39 Register classes Daniel Berlin
17:37 Re: darwin bootstrap failure in mainline Dale Johannesen
17:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals Matt Austern
17:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals Mark Mitchell
17:10 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joe Buck
17:07 Re: darwin bootstrap failure in mainline Andrew Pinski
17:05 Re: darwin bootstrap failure in mainline Dale Johannesen
16:54 darwin bootstrap failure in mainline Fariborz Jahanian
16:43 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
16:32 Re: C constant expressions proposals Robert Dewar
16:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals Mark Mitchell
16:24 Re: C constant expressions proposals Mark Mitchell
15:37 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
14:07 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types. Richard Kenner
14:00 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:59 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Robert Dewar
13:48 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) Peter Barada
13:43 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types. Nathan Sidwell
13:24 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Uros Bizjak
13:22 Re: C constant expressions proposals Robert Dewar
13:18 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Wolfgang Bangerth
13:16 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types. Richard Kenner
13:14 gcc news #9 Mathieu Lacage
13:09 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Paul Koning
13:06 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Arnaud Desitter
12:55 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Daniel Berlin
12:11 Re: Question on build_int_cst Nathan Sidwell
11:56 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Andreas Schwab
11:52 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Paolo Bonzini
11:51 Re: Question on build_int_cst Richard Kenner
11:39 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
11:36 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
11:33 Re: C constant expressions proposals Richard Kenner
11:19 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Mathieu Lacage
11:17 RE: Broken link and defunct search Gerald Pfeifer
11:14 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Chris Jefferson
10:55 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Mathieu Lacage
10:25 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Marcel Cox
10:15 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Chris Jefferson
10:07 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Uros Bizjak
09:46 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Dave Korn
08:42 Re: Question on build_int_cst Nathan Sidwell
08:37 Re: C++ case value question Nathan Sidwell
06:38 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Jeffrey A Law
05:30 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Richard Henderson
05:30 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Falk Hueffner
02:43 Re: C constant expressions proposals Mark Mitchell
02:10 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Jie Zhang
02:04 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Mike Stump
01:46 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Daniel Berlin
01:45 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
01:35 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Daniel Berlin
01:34 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Zack Weinberg
01:33 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:32 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
01:27 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Jie Zhang
01:18 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Daniel Berlin
01:04 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Robert Dewar
00:58 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Joe Buck
00:49 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Robert Dewar
00:47 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Joe Buck
00:44 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Gabor Greif
00:41 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination) James E Wilson
00:40 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Robert Dewar
00:39 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Robert Dewar
00:28 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
00:22 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6 combination) Peter Barada
00:21 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Joe Buck
00:21 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Adam Monsen
00:13 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Joe Buck
00:03 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Robert Dewar

August 17, 2004
23:53 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Robert Dewar
23:47 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Dale Johannesen
23:44 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Robert Dewar
23:26 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
23:25 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6 combination) James E Wilson
23:25 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Gabor Greif
23:25 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Stan Shebs
23:20 Re: Question about pattern combining James E Wilson
23:02 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Robert Dewar
23:00 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Robert Dewar
22:57 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Robert Dewar
22:54 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
22:44 Re: C constant expressions proposals Richard Henderson
22:39 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
22:22 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Richard Kenner
22:21 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Mike Stump
22:21 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization tm_gccmail
22:21 Re: C constant expressions proposals Geoff Keating
22:15 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Joe Buck
21:38 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
21:34 Re: powerpc64-elf config? Zack Weinberg
21:26 Re: C constant expressions proposals Geoffrey Keating
21:26 Re: powerpc64-elf config? Geoffrey Keating
21:26 Re: Dealing with ambiguities in GAS Geoffrey Keating
20:34 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
20:27 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC David Edelsohn
20:24 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Toon Moene
19:37 cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly Mostafa Hagog
19:33 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Janis Johnson
19:28 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Toon Moene
18:55 Question on build_int_cst Richard Kenner
18:25 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Marcel Cox
18:24 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Zack Weinberg
18:22 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Adam Monsen
18:14 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Dale Johannesen
18:12 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Andrew Pinski
18:11 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Andrew Pinski
18:09 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Dave Korn
18:02 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Andrew Pinski
18:01 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Zack Weinberg
17:52 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Dave Korn
17:49 Re: powerpc64-elf config? Stan Shebs
17:48 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Zack Weinberg
17:44 C++ case value question Steven L. Zook
17:41 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Paul Brook
17:37 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Steven Bosscher
17:36 Re: powerpc64-elf config? Zack Weinberg
17:32 warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins Adam Monsen
17:26 RE: powerpc64-elf config? Dave Korn
17:24 Re: powerpc64-elf config? Paul Koning
17:22 powerpc64-elf config? Stan Shebs
17:17 SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC Mark Mitchell
17:04 Re: mainline bootstrap broken for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Zack Weinberg
17:04 RE: Broken link and defunct search Dave Korn
17:03 Re: mainline bootstrap broken for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Stan Shebs
17:02 Re: initial vectorization functionality now in mainline Richard Henderson
16:49 mainline bootstrap broken for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
16:36 initial vectorization functionality now in mainline Dorit Naishlos
15:56 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
15:49 Pointer arithmetic rules in the tree optimizers? Diego Novillo
15:24 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Michael Matz
15:05 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Jeffrey A Law
14:24 Re: SPEC regression in perl Wolfgang Bangerth
13:58 Re: Generating rtx const David Edelsohn
13:46 Generating rtx const Revital Eres
12:47 Re: Broken link and defunct search Janis Johnson
12:43 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Diego Novillo
12:31 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Richard Kenner
12:17 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Diego Novillo
10:54 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
10:49 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useles_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
10:44 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Richard Kenner
10:09 Re: Profiling Rajkishore Barik
09:05 Re: Optimize zero extend for EM64T Jan Hubicka
08:45 Re: SPEC regression in perl Jeffrey A Law
08:26 SPEC regression in perl Andrew Pinski
08:00 Question about pattern combining Leehod Baruch
07:04 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Jeffrey A Law
06:02 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useles_stmts_bb Jeffrey A Law
05:54 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Jeffrey A Law
05:14 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Jeffrey A Law
01:51 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
01:13 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Natros
01:12 Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6 combination) Peter Barada

August 16, 2004
23:51 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability James E Wilson
23:50 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Henderson
23:49 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler James E Wilson
22:47 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler Daniel Kegel
22:27 Optimize zero extend for EM64T H. J. Lu
22:01 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Joseph S. Myers
21:29 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations James E Wilson
20:05 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler Mark Cuss
20:04 Re: Multi-use register clobbering. James E Wilson
19:51 Re: Weird g++ error with current 3.4 CVS Richard Guenther
19:50 Re: Question: James E Wilson
19:48 Re: Profiling James E Wilson
19:40 Weird g++ error with current 3.4 CVS Richard Guenther
19:27 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler James E Wilson
19:25 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Matt Austern
17:13 Re: Multi-use register clobbering. DJ Delorie
16:34 RE: Multi-use register clobbering. Gyle Yearsley
16:01 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Steve Kargl
15:51 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Toon Moene
15:44 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
13:51 Re: is_gimple_tmp_var, is_gimple_reg, and is_gimple_reg_type Diego Novillo
13:41 is_gimple_tmp_var, is_gimple_reg, and is_gimple_reg_type Nathanael Nerode
13:18 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
12:48 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Scott Robert Ladd
12:34 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Karel Gardas
12:15 Re: Unconfirmed Ada bugs in Bugzilla Arnaud Charlet
12:12 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Richard Kenner
12:11 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Diego Novillo
12:10 Re: More Q's regarding gimplification Steven Bosscher
12:08 Re: More questions related to gimplification Richard Kenner
12:08 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Diego Novillo
12:05 Re: More questions related to gimplification Diego Novillo
11:58 Re: More Q's regarding gimplification Diego Novillo
11:48 Unconfirmed Ada bugs in Bugzilla Giovanni Bajo
11:27 More Q's regarding gimplification Nathanael Nerode
11:25 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Michael Matz
11:23 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Andrew Haley
11:20 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Steven Bosscher
11:19 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Michael Matz
11:11 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Steven Bosscher
10:47 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Richard Kenner
10:31 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Giovanni Bajo
10:30 RE: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Rupert Wood
10:25 More questions related to gimplification Nathanael Nerode
10:03 Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer Jie Zhang
09:27 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Andrew Haley
08:20 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Nathan Sidwell
07:59 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Steven Bosscher
07:56 Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var Nathanael Nerode
07:50 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Michael Matz
07:25 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Steven Bosscher
07:11 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Steven Bosscher
06:45 Re: Dealing with ambiguities in GAS Mark Mitchell
06:36 Re: Dealing with ambiguities in GAS Zack Weinberg
06:29 Dealing with ambiguities in GAS Mark Mitchell
06:00 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Jeffrey A Law
03:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Daniel Berlin
02:40 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Andrew Pinski
02:25 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Richard Kenner
01:47 GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2 Mark Mitchell
01:23 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Daniel Berlin
01:23 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Giovanni Bajo
01:08 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Kenneth Zadeck
00:51 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Daniel Berlin
00:48 Question: Iņaki
00:43 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
00:33 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Mark Mitchell
00:14 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Andrew Pinski
00:06 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Mark Mitchell
00:01 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Mark Mitchell

August 15, 2004
22:16 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Tom Tromey
21:30 Re: GCSE botch with EH case Richard Kenner
21:25 Re: GCSE botch with EH case Daniel Berlin
20:48 Re: GCSE botch with EH case Richard Kenner
19:54 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Giovanni Bajo
19:43 Profiling Rajkishore Barik
19:36 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages? Mark Mitchell
18:56 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Dale Johannesen
18:01 gcc-3.5-20040815 is now available gccadmin
15:35 divdf3 (Was: Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries) Joern Rennecke
14:55 GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004 Scott Robert Ladd
14:01 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Daniel Berlin
13:28 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Eric Botcazou
12:09 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
11:42 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Steven Bosscher
11:25 GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Steven Bosscher
10:20 Variable Expansion Optimization Revital Eres
10:11 Re: new FAILs on HEAD Joseph S. Myers
10:08 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Olivier Hainque
09:45 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Andrew Haley
09:16 Broken link and defunct search Nikolay Mihaylov
08:15 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Falk Hueffner
06:57 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
03:53 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Andrew Pinski
03:49 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Bill Northcott
01:42 new FAILs on HEAD Michael Ritzert
01:25 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Bill Northcott
00:09 Re: How to apply gprof on gcc? James E Wilson

August 14, 2004
22:15 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler Mark Cuss
21:05 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Tom Tromey
21:02 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
20:47 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Dale Johannesen
20:32 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 David Edelsohn
19:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
19:16 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
19:04 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Bradley Lucier
18:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
18:23 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Dale Johannesen
17:13 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct? Frank Ecke
17:07 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
17:07 Re: Updated ColdFire toolchain sources available on my CVS server Peter Barada
17:03 Re: GCSE botch with EH case Daniel Berlin
17:02 Re: -fprofile-generate Nathan Sidwell
16:54 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
16:40 Re: GCSE botch with EH case Richard Kenner
16:39 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
16:37 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
16:34 -fprofile-generate Rajkishore Barik
16:31 Re: C constant expressions proposals Zack Weinberg
16:24 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
15:51 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
15:40 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
15:36 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
15:15 Re: GCSE botch with EH case Daniel Berlin
14:52 Re: Preprocessor symbols in non-C languages Joseph S. Myers
14:30 GCSE botch with EH case Richard Kenner
14:30 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
14:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
14:10 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Roger Sayle
13:56 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages? Kai Henningsen
12:23 Preprocessor symbols in non-C languages Waldek Hebisch
12:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
12:12 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
11:52 Question on cfg_remove_useles_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
10:48 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Andrew Haley
10:32 Re: fold() and target-specific macros Jakub Jelinek
10:26 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
10:18 fold() and target-specific macros Andrew Haley
10:03 Re: Converting RTL passes to the tree-pass.h structure Paolo Bonzini
09:59 Re: C constant expressions proposals Zack Weinberg
09:54 Re: [tree-profiling] Fix return predictors Steven Bosscher
09:29 Re: C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
08:22 Re: New to GCC Richard Sandiford
08:15 New to GCC jlopes151
03:28 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin James E Wilson
02:16 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Andrew Pinski
02:15 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Andrew Pinski
02:11 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Bill Northcott
01:50 [PATCH] Fix is_gimple_tmp_var Nathanael Nerode
01:36 Re: Multi-use register clobbering. James E Wilson
01:27 Re: trouble with fixincl in gcc 3.3 as cross-compiler James E Wilson
01:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals Gabriel Dos Reis
01:20 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH (with possible easy long-term solution) Richard Kenner
01:18 Re: [tree-profiling] Fix return predictors Richard Kenner
01:17 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin James E Wilson
01:11 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
01:06 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH (with possible easy long-term solution) Daniel Jacobowitz
01:05 Re: C constant expressions proposals James E Wilson
01:03 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH (with possible easy long-term solution) Nathanael Nerode
00:58 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
00:32 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Tom Tromey

August 13, 2004
23:55 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Paul Brook
23:46 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Joe Buck
23:34 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Paul Brook
23:30 gcc-3.4-20040813 is now available gccadmin
23:24 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
22:38 LLVM 1.3 Release Chris Lattner
21:45 How to apply gprof on gcc? Chunhua Liao
21:29 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages? Joe Buck
20:19 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
20:13 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Diego Novillo
19:59 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
19:50 Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Richard Kenner
19:49 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Henderson
19:26 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability James E Wilson
19:19 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages? Gerald Pfeifer
19:09 Re: Ada build failure? Richard Kenner
18:58 RE: problem in extended asm James E Wilson
18:57 Ada build failure? Nathanael Nerode
18:57 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
18:46 Re: Converting RTL passes to the tree-pass.h structure Diego Novillo
18:33 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Henderson
18:29 Re: Odd error message when compiling Ada xref Steven Bosscher
18:27 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
18:12 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Henderson
18:11 Re: Odd error message when compiling Ada xref Richard Kenner
18:08 Re: Odd error message when compiling Ada xref Steven Bosscher
17:24 Re: bounds checking and traps Andrew Haley
17:19 Converting RTL passes to the tree-pass.h structure Nathanael Nerode
17:18 Re: bounds checking and traps Zack Weinberg
16:53 Odd error message when compiling Ada xref Richard Kenner
13:56 Bootstrap failure on x86_64 possibly due to your change Richard Kenner
12:32 Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH Richard Kenner
12:18 Re: problem in extended asm Andreas Schwab
11:46 RE: mips va_arg question Dave Korn
11:46 RE: problem in extended asm Dave Korn
10:10 Re: bounds checking and traps Andrew Haley
10:06 Re: bounds checking and traps Jan Beulich
09:11 Re: bounds checking and traps Zack Weinberg
08:39 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Olivier Hainque
08:35 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 Eric Botcazou
08:28 Re: bounds checking and traps Jan Beulich
07:47 Re: bounds checking and traps Zack Weinberg
07:21 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Kai Henningsen
07:16 Re: bounds checking and traps Jan Beulich
06:54 Re: bounds checking and traps Zack Weinberg
06:42 Re: bounds checking and traps Jan Beulich
06:40 Re: bounds checking and traps Jan Beulich
06:13 Re: gcc news #8 Bernardo Innocenti
02:52 Re: gcc summit proceedings Casey Marshall
02:45 Re: gcc summit proceedings Florian Krohm
02:18 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability James E Wilson
02:08 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability James E Wilson
02:08 Hole with gimplifying SAVE_EXPRs Richard Kenner
01:45 Re: gcc summit proceedings Daniel Berlin
01:13 Re: gcc summit proceedings Joe Buck
01:00 Re: gcc summit proceedings Florian Krohm
00:52 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Richard Henderson
00:49 Re: bounds checking and traps Richard Henderson
00:49 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations James E Wilson
00:06 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Ian Lance Taylor

August 12, 2004
23:57 Re: gcc summit proceedings Joe Buck
23:57 Multi-use register clobbering. Gyle Yearsley
23:48 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 Daniel Jacobowitz
23:45 Re: Request for copyright assignment information James E Wilson
23:42 Re: bounds checking and traps James E Wilson
23:36 Re: GCC Linking Problem James E Wilson
23:26 Re: xscale performance optimization difference between gcc 3.2 and3.4.0 James E Wilson
23:20 Re: gcc summit proceedings James E Wilson
23:04 Re: problem in extended asm James E Wilson
22:46 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work James E Wilson
22:44 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability James E Wilson
21:38 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Gwenole Beauchesne
21:33 Re: mips va_arg question Mike Stump
21:09 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Henderson
21:07 Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Steven Bosscher
21:05 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
21:00 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Henderson
20:59 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
20:59 Where do I mention a branch in our web pages? Mark Mitchell
20:57 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf) Arkadiusz Pawlik
20:57 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Henderson
20:54 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
20:50 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Henderson
20:44 Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Richard Henderson
20:42 Re: modulus question Pat Haugen
20:40 Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Steven Bosscher
20:39 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
20:33 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Henderson
20:23 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
20:19 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
19:06 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Geoffrey Keating
18:48 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Robert Dewar
17:59 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 Joe Buck
17:57 Re: html problem with http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html Paolo Carlini
17:48 RE: html problem with http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html Dave Korn
17:42 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 Eric Botcazou
17:39 html problem with http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html Paolo Carlini
17:36 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Karel Gardas
17:22 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Diego Novillo
17:02 Re: Controlling winding library Paul Brook
16:54 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf) Joe Buck
16:51 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf) Andreas Schwab
16:23 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf) Arkadiusz Pawlik
16:15 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
15:38 Re: Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Henderson
15:06 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork Gwenole Beauchesne
14:19 Controlling winding library Mangal
14:17 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Michael Matz
14:01 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Olivier Hainque
13:14 Re: mips va_arg question Mile Davidovic
13:13 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Daniel Jacobowitz
13:12 RE: mips va_arg question Dave Korn
13:08 Re: mips va_arg question Richard Sandiford
13:05 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Olivier Hainque
13:05 RE: mips va_arg question Dave Korn
13:02 RE: mips va_arg question Mile Davidovic
12:55 Re: mips va_arg question Mile Davidovic
12:53 Two problems with gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
12:52 Re: mips va_arg question Richard Sandiford
12:47 RE: mips va_arg question Dave Korn
12:40 Re: Your VLA change and Ada Andreas Jaeger
12:33 Re: mips va_arg question Richard Sandiford
11:59 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork Gwenole Beauchesne
11:55 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork Gwenole Beauchesne
11:33 RE: problem in extended asm Dave Korn
11:01 mips va_arg question Mile Davidovic
10:15 Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Richard Kenner
10:06 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf) Andreas Schwab
09:31 Re: Your VLA change and Ada Richard Kenner
09:16 Re: Your VLA change and Ada Andreas Jaeger
08:32 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Joseph S. Myers
07:35 question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf) Jonathan Wilson
06:28 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Richard Henderson
05:56 Re: Jump threading/bypassing volume 3. Jeffrey A Law
05:16 trouble with fixincl in gcc 3.3 as cross-compiler Bob Frazier
05:13 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Steve Kargl
04:56 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 Edward Peschko
04:19 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Richard Henderson
04:12 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Tom Tromey
03:35 Libobjc and libffi on Darwin Bill Northcott
03:27 Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran? Steve Kargl

August 11, 2004
23:35 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Joseph S. Myers
23:30 gcc-3.3-20040811 is now available gccadmin
22:56 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Joseph S. Myers
22:47 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Joe Buck
22:29 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) David Edelsohn
22:20 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Giovanni Bajo
22:18 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work James E Wilson
22:01 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Steven Bosscher
21:43 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Eric Christopher
21:38 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Richard Kenner
21:29 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Mark Mitchell
21:24 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Mark Mitchell
21:16 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Richard Kenner
21:12 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Mark Mitchell
21:09 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Mark Mitchell
21:00 Re: Identify destructor/constructor Mark Mitchell
20:34 Re: problem in extended asm Denis Zaitsev
20:32 Re: problem in extended asm Denis Zaitsev
20:31 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
20:22 Optimization question continued Piotr Wyderski
19:32 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work James E Wilson
19:28 Re: problem in extended asm Andreas Schwab
19:24 Re: problem in extended asm tm_gccmail
19:12 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 Joe Buck
19:09 Re: Your VLA change and Ada Richard Kenner
19:07 Re: modulus question James E Wilson
18:46 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target Geoff Keating
18:45 Re: problem in extended asm Denis Zaitsev
18:45 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
18:34 Re: Identify destructor/constructor James E Wilson
18:26 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 James E Wilson
18:24 Re: Failed (fpga-info@xess.com) fpga-info
17:56 Re: Your VLA change and Ada Diego Novillo
17:52 Re: Your VLA change and Ada Richard Kenner
17:47 Re: Your VLA change and Ada Richard Henderson
17:29 Request for copyright assignment information Chris Jefferson
17:07 Re: Missing "line-map.*" in gcc cvs repository Zack Weinberg
16:55 Re: Missing "line-map.*" in gcc cvs repository Daniel Jacobowitz
16:54 Your VLA change and Ada Richard Kenner
16:07 Re: Explicitly defining a copy-constructor may cost a lot: optimization bug? Giovanni Bajo
14:47 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target David Edelsohn
14:28 Explicitly defining a copy-constructor may cost a lot: optimizationbug? Roberto Bagnara
14:19 bounds checking and traps Jan Beulich
14:02 Missing "line-map.*" in gcc cvs repository Awbice
13:43 RE: problem in extended asm Dave Korn
13:00 GCC Linking Problem Peng, Chuck C
11:33 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Joern Rennecke
10:35 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target Gabriel Paubert
09:31 RE: problem in extended asm Dave Korn
09:12 gcc news #8 Mathieu Lacage
09:04 RE: problem in extended asm Dave Korn
08:43 Re: Dependent names in template Jonathan Wakely
08:27 Re: Missing debug information for decls in empty blocks Nicolas Setton
08:24 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p Florian Weimer
08:14 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p Jakub Jelinek
08:04 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target Régis Odeyé
08:00 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p Andreas Schwab
07:41 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p Michael Veksler
07:36 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Rakesh Kumar, Noida
06:48 xscale performance optimization difference between gcc 3.2 and 3.4.0 Bill Garner
06:36 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p Florian Weimer
03:59 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Bradley Lucier
03:55 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Dale Johannesen
01:52 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 David Edelsohn
00:43 Re: Missing debug information for decls in empty blocks James E Wilson
00:28 C constant expressions proposals Joseph S. Myers
00:21 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work James E Wilson
00:13 Re: problem in extended asm Andreas Schwab

August 10, 2004
22:59 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Matt Austern
22:56 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p Joseph S. Myers
22:47 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Bradley Lucier
22:23 Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5 Bradley Lucier
22:18 __builtin_string_constant_p Florian Weimer
22:14 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
22:00 Re: problem in extended asm Paul Koning
21:42 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw James E Wilson
21:25 Re: Optimization question Joe Buck
20:35 Re: Optimization question Piotr Wyderski
20:06 Re: Another DCE problem with array addresses Laurent GUERBY
19:57 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Alexandre Oliva
19:12 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work James E Wilson
19:08 Re: Another DCE problem with array addresses Richard Kenner
18:50 Re: "segmentation fault" Mike Stump
17:46 Re: Optimization question Joe Buck
17:35 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug Diego Novillo
17:16 Re: Another DCE problem with array addresses Diego Novillo
16:53 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug Diego Novillo
14:52 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target David Edelsohn
14:44 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target Régis Odeyé
14:36 RE: SSA code debugging Andrew MacLeod
14:23 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target David Edelsohn
13:59 RE: SSA code debugging Diego Novillo
13:44 RE: SSA code debugging Flynn, Lori Arline (Lori)
13:27 Re: SSA code debugging Diego Novillo
13:14 SSA code debugging Flynn, Lori Arline (Lori)
12:27 [OT] Survey about FS/OS Developers Frauke Lehmann
12:26 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Olivier Hainque
12:18 cr logical instruction for powerpc target Régis Odeyé
08:57 "segmentation fault" rinku rathore
08:32 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Segher Boessenkool
08:08 Re: problem in extended asm Denis Zaitsev
08:05 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
07:38 gcc summit proceedings Mathieu Lacage
06:28 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Steven Bosscher
04:28 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run Zack Weinberg
04:17 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work James E Wilson
04:13 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Mark Mitchell
04:08 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Scott Robert Ladd
02:18 Re: Stage 3 and current breakage Zack Weinberg
02:17 Re: problem in extended asm Bernardo Innocenti
02:03 Re: Jump threading/bypassing volume 3 Kenneth Zadeck
01:52 Stage 3 and current breakage Andrew Pinski
01:17 Re: Optimization question Diego Novillo
01:06 Keeping the SSA form up-to-date Diego Novillo
01:04 Re: Optimization question James E Wilson
00:56 issues with rtl vector operators James E Wilson
00:17 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Roger Sayle
00:12 Re: Optimization question Piotr Wyderski

August 09, 2004
23:59 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Giovanni Bajo
23:55 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Giovanni Bajo
23:04 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Richard Kenner
22:36 Re: Jump threading/bypassing volume 3 Jeffrey A Law
21:50 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Geoffrey Keating
21:44 Re: PR preprocessor/16950: [3.5 regression]: -Wno-deprecated doesn't work H. J. Lu
21:40 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09) Dorit Naishlos
21:28 [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
21:17 Re: Question on VUSE Diego Novillo
21:09 Re: Question on VUSE Arnaud Charlet
21:06 Re: Question on VUSE Diego Novillo
21:03 Re: PR preprocessor/16950: [3.5 regression]: -Wno-deprecated doesn't work H. J. Lu
21:02 PR preprocessor/16950: [3.5 regression]: -Wno-deprecated doesn't work H. J. Lu
20:35 Re: modulus question Andrew Pinski
20:32 modulus question Pat Haugen
20:32 Jump threading/bypassing volume 3 Kenneth Zadeck
19:52 Re: Alias attribute vs targets Paolo Carlini
19:24 Re: ppc: weird movdi_internal32 interaction with FLOAT_REGS Geoff Keating
18:59 Jump threading/bypassing volume 2 Jeffrey A Law
18:45 GCC Status (2004-08-09) mitchell
18:43 Re: Optimization question James E Wilson
18:29 Re: Alias attribute vs targets James E Wilson
18:09 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files James E Wilson
18:08 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files James E Wilson
17:33 RE: problem in extended asm Dave Korn
17:22 Re: Output filename currently being compiled Phil Edwards
17:17 Re: Output filename currently being compiled Nick NoSpam
17:10 problem in extended asm Ankit Jain
17:01 Re: Output filename currently being compiled Dale Johannesen
16:29 Re: Output filename currently being compiled Mike Stump
16:26 Re: Identifying VAR_DECL node for __FUNCTION__ etc. Mike Stump
15:46 Re: Problem with insn-conditions.c Zack Weinberg
15:21 Re: Output filename currently being compiled Nick NoSpam
15:14 Re: Output filename currently being compiled Paul Brook
15:07 Output filename currently being compiled Nick NoSpam
13:12 RE: Problem with insn-conditions.c Dave Korn
13:08 Identifying VAR_DECL node for __FUNCTION__ etc. Revital Eres
11:59 ppc: weird movdi_internal32 interaction with FLOAT_REGS Aldy Hernandez
10:34 Re: Missing debug information for decls in empty blocks Nicolas Setton
09:02 Identify destructor/constructor Revital Eres
07:40 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Michael Matz
06:41 Re: [RFC/RFT] Tree-level lowering of generic vectors, part 2 Paolo Bonzini
05:06 Re: Inline functiion in GCC Venkatachala Upadhya
04:23 Re: Preprocessing powerpc *.S files? Giovanni Bajo
04:01 Preprocessing powerpc *.S files? Ari Entlich
01:56 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw David Edelsohn

August 08, 2004
22:52 error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31 Edward Peschko
21:58 Re: optimization question Piotr Wyderski
21:17 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
20:32 Re: indirect_operand and memory_operand Zack Weinberg
19:23 Re: Is Gcc broken on x86-64? H. J. Lu
18:33 Re: Is Gcc broken on x86-64? Jakub Jelinek
18:03 Re: Dependent names in template Mark Mitchell
17:58 gcc-3.5-20040808 is now available gccadmin
14:21 Re: PATCH for Re: Solaris installation notes Eric Botcazou
13:53 Optimization question Piotr Wyderski
08:45 Re: Dependent names in template Gabriel Dos Reis
08:43 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions? Jan Hubicka
06:39 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Richard Sandiford
06:15 Re: Dependent names in template Michael Veksler
04:30 Re: Problem with insn-conditions.c Will Pugh
00:32 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files James E Wilson
00:11 Re: build time profiling? James E Wilson
00:05 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork James E Wilson

August 07, 2004
23:52 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug Diego Novillo
23:47 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability James E Wilson
22:45 re: build time profiling? Dan Kegel
20:22 Alias attribute vs targets Paolo Carlini
18:38 Re: Problem with insn-conditions.c Zack Weinberg
17:37 RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Richard Sandiford
17:12 Problem with insn-conditions.c Will Pugh
14:25 BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work Denis Zaitsev
13:32 Re: C++ query Nathan Sidwell
05:44 Re: Inline functiion in GCC Robert Dewar
05:24 Re: RTL generation Zack Weinberg
03:55 RTL generation Hsin-Hsien Wu
00:13 RE: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Wichmann, Mats D
00:02 Is Gcc broken on x86-64? H. J. Lu

August 06, 2004
23:33 build time profiling? troy d . straszheim
23:18 Re: indirect_operand and memory_operand James E Wilson
23:17 gcc-3.4-20040806 is now available gccadmin
23:02 Re: Inline functiion in GCC Joe Buck
22:40 SSA jump threading/bypassing -- an update Jeffrey A Law
21:28 Re: Inline functiion in GCC Paul Brook
21:20 Re: Inline functiion in GCC James E Wilson
21:18 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion? James E Wilson
21:00 indirect_operand and memory_operand Zack Weinberg
20:54 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw James E Wilson
19:56 Re: Missing debug information for decls in empty blocks James E Wilson
19:26 Re: A question about c-parse.y James E Wilson
17:57 Dale Johannesen appointed Darwin maintainer David Edelsohn
15:19 Re: Question about inline optimization Andrew Pinski
15:05 Question about inline optimization Arkadiusz Pawlik
15:04 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion? Andreas Schwab
14:20 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion? Karel Gardas
14:13 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion? Wouter van Heyst
13:55 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion? Jan Beulich
13:51 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion? Steven Bosscher
13:50 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion? Paul Brook
13:41 how to submit binary file for inclusion? Jan Beulich
13:27 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug Richard Kenner
12:27 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors Amit S. Kale
11:51 RE: Inline functiion in GCC Richard Earnshaw
11:40 Re: Inline functiion in GCC Nathan Sidwell
11:39 RE: Inline functiion in GCC jeroen dobbelaere
11:33 Re: Inline functiion in GCC Paul Brook
11:25 Re: Inline functiion in GCC Richard Earnshaw
10:26 Inline functiion in GCC Venkatachala Upadhya
08:53 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions? Alan Modra
08:16 Re: [WWWDOCS] Bad links on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html Gerald Pfeifer
08:11 O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability Olivier Hainque
08:03 Re: Dependent names in template Jonathan Wakely
07:39 Re: Ready-to-use GNU Tools for Renesas micros Gerald Pfeifer
07:10 PATCH for Re: Solaris installation notes Gerald Pfeifer
06:19 Re: ICE on GCC mainline for the avr target Andrew Pinski
05:40 Re: gdb question Jie Zhang
05:21 ICE on GCC mainline for the avr target Bernardo Innocenti
04:57 Re: gcc debugging Gerald Pfeifer
04:41 PATCH for Re: Dead mirror site? Gerald Pfeifer
04:33 gdb question Hickerson, David A
04:23 Re: Unrecognizable insn James E Wilson
03:40 RFC/RFH Drastic simplifications to generic operand predicates Zack Weinberg
00:02 Re: catenation of CPP tokens Falk Hueffner
00:02 Re: catenation of CPP tokens Matt Austern

August 05, 2004
23:56 catenation of CPP tokens byron
23:54 catenation of CPP tokens Byron Berglund
23:53 Re: Dependent names in template Mark Mitchell
22:38 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions? H. J. Lu
22:18 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Joern Rennecke
22:02 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions? Mike Stump
21:23 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run James E Wilson
20:58 Linker support for -freorder-functions? H. J. Lu
19:41 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run Zack Weinberg
18:32 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Joern Rennecke
18:11 Re: gcc 3.4.2 branch and gcc 3.5 release schedule James E Wilson
18:10 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run Mike Stump
17:56 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run James E Wilson
17:29 Re: Unrecognizable insn Shinpei Kato
16:40 RE: I'm beginner Dave Korn
16:26 Dead mirror site? Dave Korn
16:14 RE: I'm beginner Dave Korn
15:38 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors Daniel Jacobowitz
15:26 I'm beginner 百 晓生
15:19 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw H. J. Lu
15:08 Missing debug information for decls in empty blocks Nicolas Setton
15:07 Unrecognizable insn Shinpei Kato
14:49 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors Amit S. Kale
14:46 RE: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Dave Korn
14:44 Re: Fortran question Toon Moene
14:40 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Jason Thorpe
14:20 Dependent names in template Jonathan Wakely
13:48 *_BY_PIECES_P flaw Jakub Jelinek
13:28 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run Samium Gromoff
13:19 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Daniel Jacobowitz
10:35 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Richard Earnshaw
09:37 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Nick Clifton
09:08 A question about c-parse.y Simos Kordas
07:43 Re: mainline regression for vector types in C++ Paolo Bonzini
05:28 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug Richard Henderson
04:01 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run Zack Weinberg
02:23 Re: [RFC] N_BNSYM/N_ENSYM stabs Mike Stump
02:17 Re: CVS server flakiness? Christopher Faylor
02:14 Re: CVS server flakiness? Andrew Pinski
02:13 Re: CVS server flakiness? Andrew Pinski
02:09 CVS server flakiness? Ziemowit Laski
01:46 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run James E Wilson
01:31 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run James E Wilson
01:00 [RFC] N_BNSYM/N_ENSYM stabs Devang Patel
00:25 Re: Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin 6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

August 04, 2004
22:25 Re: tree-SSA Bogus dominator optimization Richard Henderson
22:20 Re: mainline regression for vector types in C++ Janis Johnson
22:10 mainline regression for vector types in C++ Janis Johnson
21:24 Re: Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain? Andreas Tobler
20:55 Re: Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin 6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain? Matt Austern
20:47 Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin 6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
19:58 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Joern Rennecke
19:50 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Joern Rennecke
18:27 Re: Support for Thumb PLT entries Arnald Samthambi
16:58 Re: Support for Thumb PLT entries Daniel Jacobowitz
16:56 Re: Support for Thumb PLT entries Arnald Samthambi
16:46 RE: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run Dave Korn
16:38 gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run Samium Gromoff
15:53 Re: Support for Thumb PLT entries Richard Earnshaw
15:45 Support for Thumb PLT entries Arnald Samthambi
15:37 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors Daniel Jacobowitz
15:16 Re: bootstrap failure powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 Mike Stump
14:44 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline Joseph S. Myers
12:08 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Joern Rennecke
11:02 gcc 3.4.2 branch and gcc 3.5 release schedule Asgari J. Jinia
10:25 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Richard Earnshaw
09:17 Re: gcc: speed problem with several g++ versions Patrick Audley
08:42 tree-SSA Bogus dominator optimization Andrew Haley
08:12 Re: Strange Scope effects Robert Dewar
06:15 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Andrew Haley
05:08 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors Amit S. Kale
04:43 bootstrap failure powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 Zack Weinberg
03:20 Re: bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2 Alexander Kabaev
02:28 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers James E Wilson
01:59 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Ian Lance Taylor
01:19 Re: apple-ppc-branch doesn't bootstrap Mike Stump
00:10 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Kaz Kojima
00:01 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline Stan Shebs

August 03, 2004
22:00 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Aaron W. LaFramboise
20:33 Call for Participation & Event Sponsors-WOW CMS & Web Services 2004 Las Vegas robert
19:57 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch with mainline Ziemowit Laski
19:48 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline Joseph S. Myers
19:48 Re: Question on VUSE Richard Kenner
19:41 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to loop optimization and builtin_stack_alloc Richard Kenner
19:40 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch with mainline Ziemowit Laski
19:39 Re: Question on VUSE Richard Henderson
19:36 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to loop optimization and builtin_stack_alloc Richard Henderson
19:17 Re: Question on VUSE Richard Kenner
19:14 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to loop optimization and builtin_stack_alloc Richard Kenner
19:11 Re: Question on VUSE Richard Henderson
19:09 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to loop optimization and builtin_stack_alloc Richard Henderson
18:56 Re: bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2 Andrew Pinski
18:46 Re: bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2 Steve Kargl
18:35 Re: error in finding a register to spill James E Wilson
18:30 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline Mark Mitchell
18:29 Re: bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2 Andrew Pinski
18:22 bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2 Steve Kargl
18:15 Re: h8300-coff build error with gcc-3.5-20040704 James E Wilson
18:03 [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults Paul Brook
17:48 Re: how to disable fixincl compiling and call James E Wilson
17:35 Question on VUSE Richard Kenner
16:27 Re: Strange Scope effects Nathan Sidwell
16:27 Re: Strange Scope effects Joe Buck
16:23 Strange Scope effects Thomas Schoebel-Theuer
16:12 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk Mark Mitchell
15:47 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk Mark Mitchell
15:29 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to loop optimization and builtin_stack_alloc Richard Kenner
15:19 Re: Implicit built-in function declarations Joseph S. Myers
14:42 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to loop optimization and builtin_stack_alloc Daniel Jacobowitz
14:33 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors Daniel Jacobowitz
14:28 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors Amit S. Kale
14:18 Re: dfa scheduler, bundling and packing 林 彭
13:17 Re: --target=powerpc-unknown-elf, binutils-2.15? Phil Edwards
12:40 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk Joern Rennecke
11:37 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk Joern Rennecke
07:58 Re: Fortran question Lassi A . Tuura
06:36 Re: error in finding a register to spill Shinpei Kato
06:25 Re: Fortran question Gabriel Dos Reis
06:24 Re: Fortran question H. J. Lu
06:04 Re: Fortran question Lassi A . Tuura
05:17 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline Stan Shebs
03:09 Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug Richard Kenner
02:40 Re: v3sf type and union types to reference elements Dylan Cuthbert
01:10 Fortran question Dale Johannesen
01:01 Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch with mainline Ziemowit Laski
00:18 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Alan Cox

August 02, 2004
23:36 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 anderson
23:34 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Joe Buck
23:22 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
23:17 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Joe Buck
23:15 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Henderson
22:56 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Henderson
22:56 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
22:45 Re: --target=powerpc-unknown-elf, binutils-2.15? Torsten Mohr
22:25 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
21:51 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
21:38 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
21:34 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
21:13 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Henderson
20:51 Support COMDAT group H. J. Lu
20:17 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunkwith -fPIC (fwd)) Mark Mitchell
20:11 Re: v3sf type and union types to reference elements Richard Henderson
18:35 RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries Joern Rennecke
17:59 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Bryce McKinlay
17:04 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Andrew Haley
16:47 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Bryce McKinlay
14:31 RE: h8300-coff build error with gcc-3.5-20040704 Nitin Shah
14:19 Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk with -fPIC (fwd)) Joern Rennecke
13:59 Re: gcc-question Nathan Sidwell
12:52 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
12:40 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
11:14 Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Andrew Haley
11:03 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Gabriel Dos Reis
10:59 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Laurent GUERBY
10:47 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Gabriel Dos Reis
10:32 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Laurent GUERBY
10:17 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Gabriel Dos Reis
09:53 Re: v3sf type and union types to reference elements Dylan Cuthbert
09:47 Re: v3sf type and union types to reference elements Paolo Bonzini
09:28 v3sf type and union types to reference elements Dylan Cuthbert
09:20 how to disable fixincl compiling and call silverio . di
08:51 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Henderson
08:32 Re: --target=powerpc-unknown-elf, binutils-2.15? Alan Modra
08:14 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Gabriel Dos Reis
07:18 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Henderson
06:57 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Jim Kingdon
05:28 Re: Question about precise definition FLOOR_MOD_EXPR Geoffrey Keating
05:20 Re: Implicit built-in function declarations Geoffrey Keating
03:17 Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs Richard Kenner
01:35 Re: Question about precise definition FLOOR_MOD_EXPR Richard Henderson
01:29 Question about precise definition FLOOR_MOD_EXPR Richard Kenner
01:05 --target=powerpc-unknown-elf, binutils-2.15? Torsten Mohr

August 01, 2004
23:46 Re: gcc-3 on Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.1B (Rev. 2650) James E Wilson
23:41 Re: gcc-3.4.1 build problem James E Wilson
23:33 Re: i am working with mmx James E Wilson
23:29 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler James E Wilson
23:07 Re: error in finding a register to spill James E Wilson
22:51 Re: GCC 3.4.1 error in input.h James E Wilson
22:45 Re: different pointer kinds James E Wilson
22:26 Implicit built-in function declarations Joseph S. Myers
21:40 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Alan Cox
19:41 Re: gcc-ss-3.5-20040801 is now available Joseph S. Myers
19:12 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 John David Anglin
18:47 Re: gcc-ss-3.5-20040801 is now available Toon Moene
18:24 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Geoff Keating
17:57 gcc-ss-3.5-20040801 is now available gccadmin
13:26 Another DCE problem with array addresses Richard Kenner
13:12 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Ulrich Weigand
12:45 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Geert Bosch
11:16 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 anderson
06:46 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Phil Edwards
05:58 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Geoffrey Keating
00:34 Re: LSB naming Joe Buck
00:28 Re: LSB naming Andrew Pinski
00:27 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Alan Cox
00:19 LSB naming Alan Cox
00:16 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Joe Buck
00:12 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Joe Buck
00:09 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Alan Cox
00:05 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1 Nathan Myers
00:05 Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers Bryce McKinlay


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3