gcc archive
author index for August, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

百晓生

2004-08-05 15:26 I'm beginner

林彭

2004-08-03 14:18 Re: dfa scheduler, bundling and packing

Jinag Robert

2004-08-22 09:54 How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu?

Ankit Jain

2004-08-09 17:10 problem in extended asm

Régis Odeyé

2004-08-10 12:18 cr logical instruction for powerpc target
2004-08-10 14:44 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target
2004-08-11 08:04 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target

René Rebe

2004-08-18 22:13 2004 Summit Proceedings missing

Tobias Schlüter

2004-08-26 13:17 Re: gcc/gcc fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-decl.c ...
2004-08-31 20:21 Libgfortran licensing
2004-08-31 22:19 Re: Libgfortran licensing

Aaron W. LaFramboise

2004-08-03 22:00 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers

Adam Monsen

2004-08-17 17:32 warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-17 18:20 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 00:21 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins

Alan Cox

2004-08-01 00:09 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-01 00:19 LSB naming
2004-08-01 00:27 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-01 21:40 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-03 00:18 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

Alan Modra

2004-08-02 08:32 Re: --target=powerpc-unknown-elf, binutils-2.15?
2004-08-06 08:53 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions?
2004-08-30 02:34 segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
2004-08-31 07:38 Re: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR

Aldy Hernandez

2004-08-09 11:59 ppc: weird movdi_internal32 interaction with FLOAT_REGS
2004-08-23 23:48 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets

Alexander Kabaev

2004-08-04 03:20 Re: bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2

Alexandre Oliva

2004-08-10 19:57 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-28 03:01 volunteering to maintain the FR-V port

Amit S. Kale

2004-08-03 14:28 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors
2004-08-04 05:08 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors
2004-08-05 14:49 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors
2004-08-06 12:27 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors

Anders Fugmann

2004-08-19 13:42 Error in stl?
2004-08-19 14:50 Re: Error in stl?

anderson

2004-08-01 11:16 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-02 23:36 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

Andreas Jaeger

2004-08-12 09:16 Re: Your VLA change and Ada
2004-08-12 12:40 Re: Your VLA change and Ada
2004-08-24 04:40 make protoize broken with your changes
2004-08-28 16:04 s390 bootstrap broken on mainline

Andreas Schwab

2004-08-06 15:04 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion?
2004-08-11 00:13 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-11 08:00 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p
2004-08-11 19:28 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-12 10:06 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf)
2004-08-12 16:51 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf)
2004-08-13 12:18 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-18 11:56 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-23 16:23 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:25 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 22:29 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-27 08:45 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings
2004-08-28 15:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-28 17:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

Andreas Tobler

2004-08-04 21:24 Re: Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain?
2004-08-23 20:10 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8

Andrew Haley

2004-08-02 11:14 Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-02 17:04 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-04 06:15 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-04 08:42 tree-SSA Bogus dominator optimization
2004-08-13 10:10 Re: bounds checking and traps
2004-08-13 17:24 Re: bounds checking and traps
2004-08-14 10:18 fold() and target-specific macros
2004-08-14 10:48 Re: fold() and target-specific macros
2004-08-15 09:45 Re: fold() and target-specific macros
2004-08-16 09:27 Re: fold() and target-specific macros
2004-08-16 11:23 Re: fold() and target-specific macros
2004-08-23 10:55 Is it possible to compile for another os?
2004-08-25 09:54 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes
2004-08-25 10:07 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes
2004-08-25 10:16 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes
2004-08-25 10:36 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes
2004-08-25 12:22 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes

Andrew MacLeod

2004-08-10 14:36 RE: SSA code debugging
2004-08-23 19:00 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-25 13:07 gfortran test runs
2004-08-25 13:51 Re: gfortran test runs
2004-08-25 14:00 Re: gfortran test runs
2004-08-25 15:49 Re: gfortran test runs
2004-08-27 14:18 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables

Andrew Pinski

2004-08-01 00:28 Re: LSB naming
2004-08-03 18:29 Re: bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2
2004-08-03 18:56 Re: bootstrap of HEAD fails on FreeBSD AMD2 due to __clzdi2
2004-08-05 02:13 Re: CVS server flakiness?
2004-08-05 02:14 Re: CVS server flakiness?
2004-08-06 06:19 Re: ICE on GCC mainline for the avr target
2004-08-06 15:19 Re: Question about inline optimization
2004-08-09 20:35 Re: modulus question
2004-08-10 01:52 Stage 3 and current breakage
2004-08-14 02:15 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-14 02:16 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-15 03:53 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-16 00:14 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-16 02:40 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2
2004-08-17 08:26 SPEC regression in perl
2004-08-17 18:02 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-17 18:11 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-17 18:12 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 17:07 Re: darwin bootstrap failure in mainline
2004-08-23 14:21 Re: Several C++ regressions
2004-08-23 16:39 Re: Several C++ regressions
2004-08-23 18:27 Re: Several C++ regressions
2004-08-23 22:49 Re: Several C++ regressions
2004-08-23 23:15 Re: Several C++ regressions
2004-08-23 23:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 05:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 21:08 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-25 21:30 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-26 03:23 number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start
2004-08-26 03:33 Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop
2004-08-29 23:40 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 00:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 23:01 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop
2004-08-31 23:55 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available

Ari Entlich

2004-08-09 04:01 Preprocessing powerpc *.S files?

Arkadiusz Pawlik

2004-08-06 15:05 Question about inline optimization
2004-08-12 16:23 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf)
2004-08-12 20:57 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf)

Arnald Samthambi

2004-08-04 15:45 Support for Thumb PLT entries
2004-08-04 16:56 Re: Support for Thumb PLT entries
2004-08-04 18:27 Re: Support for Thumb PLT entries

Arnaud Charlet

2004-08-09 21:09 Re: Question on VUSE
2004-08-16 12:15 Re: Unconfirmed Ada bugs in Bugzilla
2004-08-19 13:23 Ada broken on HEAD
2004-08-19 13:42 Re: Ada broken on HEAD
2004-08-31 09:00 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 09:42 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha

Arnaud Desitter

2004-08-18 13:06 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004

Asgari J. Jinia

2004-08-04 11:02 gcc 3.4.2 branch and gcc 3.5 release schedule

Awbice

2004-08-11 14:02 Missing "line-map.*" in gcc cvs repository

Ayal Zaks

2004-08-15 12:09 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-16 13:18 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-18 00:28 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-22 22:41 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-23 14:58 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-23 21:54 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization

b dot ecologie at free dot fr

2004-08-29 15:47 Lettre-message de b.ecologie@free.fr

Ben Elliston

2004-08-20 11:27 Re: [development-gcc] GCC 3.5 project submissions (fwd)
2004-08-20 13:10 Re: How to apply gprof on gcc?

Ben Yip

2004-08-19 12:17 gcc IN R

Bernardo Innocenti

2004-08-06 05:21 ICE on GCC mainline for the avr target
2004-08-10 02:17 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-13 06:13 Re: gcc news #8

Bill Garner

2004-08-11 06:48 xscale performance optimization difference between gcc 3.2 and 3.4.0

Bill Northcott

2004-08-12 03:35 Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-14 02:11 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-15 01:25 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-15 03:49 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-31 04:51 GNU libobjc on Darwin

Bob Frazier

2004-08-12 05:16 trouble with fixincl in gcc 3.3 as cross-compiler

Boris von Loesch

2004-08-26 14:03 Bug in implicit conversion (gcc 3.4.1)?

Bradley Lucier

2004-08-10 22:23 Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-10 22:47 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-11 03:59 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-14 19:04 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-30 03:03 Mainline space problem

Bryce McKinlay

2004-08-01 00:05 Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-02 16:47 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-02 17:59 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers

byron

2004-08-05 23:56 catenation of CPP tokens

Byron Berglund

2004-08-05 23:54 catenation of CPP tokens

Carolina

2004-08-27 16:41 Facilite sua vida ou Empresa

Caroline Tice

2004-08-18 18:05 Fwd: Register classes

Casey Marshall

2004-08-13 02:52 Re: gcc summit proceedings

Chris Jefferson

2004-08-11 17:29 Request for copyright assignment information
2004-08-18 10:15 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 11:14 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-19 21:14 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins

Chris Lattner

2004-08-13 22:38 LLVM 1.3 Release

Christopher Faylor

2004-08-05 02:17 Re: CVS server flakiness?

Chunhua Liao

2004-08-13 21:45 How to apply gprof on gcc?
2004-08-27 22:49 Any recommendation for an expert on RTL?

Clif Smith

2004-08-26 21:04 Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied
2004-08-26 21:42 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied

Clifford Wolf

2004-08-23 22:21 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 22:47 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?

D. Starner

2004-08-27 21:26 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

Dale Johannesen

2004-08-03 01:10 Fortran question
2004-08-09 17:01 Re: Output filename currently being compiled
2004-08-11 03:55 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-14 18:23 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-14 20:47 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-15 18:56 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-17 18:14 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-17 23:47 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-18 17:05 Re: darwin bootstrap failure in mainline
2004-08-18 17:37 Re: darwin bootstrap failure in mainline
2004-08-24 22:40 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
2004-08-24 23:09 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros

Dan Kegel

2004-08-07 22:45 re: build time profiling?
2004-08-31 15:27 Re: Cross_compiler error!HELP ME

Daniel Berlin

2004-08-13 01:45 Re: gcc summit proceedings
2004-08-14 15:15 Re: GCSE botch with EH case
2004-08-14 17:03 Re: GCSE botch with EH case
2004-08-15 14:01 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-15 21:25 Re: GCSE botch with EH case
2004-08-16 00:51 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-16 01:23 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-16 03:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2
2004-08-18 01:18 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 01:35 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 01:46 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 12:55 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 17:39 Register classes
2004-08-18 18:16 Re: Register classes
2004-08-18 20:22 GCC Wiki
2004-08-19 13:49 Re: Register classes
2004-08-19 17:55 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types.
2004-08-20 02:07 Re: Register classes
2004-08-20 17:14 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing
2004-08-26 03:37 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop
2004-08-26 03:37 Re: number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start
2004-08-26 03:41 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop
2004-08-30 00:25 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 00:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 01:51 [RFC]: Removal of libbanshee and tree-alias-* from mainline
2004-08-30 02:41 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 12:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 03:31 Re: Mainline space problem
2004-08-31 18:37 Re: Mainline space problem
2004-08-31 20:26 Re: Mainline space problem

Daniel Jacobowitz

2004-08-03 14:33 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors
2004-08-03 14:42 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to loop optimization and builtin_stack_alloc
2004-08-04 15:37 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors
2004-08-04 16:58 Re: Support for Thumb PLT entries
2004-08-05 13:19 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults
2004-08-05 15:38 Re: Problems with breakpoints in constructors
2004-08-11 16:55 Re: Missing "line-map.*" in gcc cvs repository
2004-08-12 13:13 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-12 23:48 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31
2004-08-14 01:06 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH (with possible easy long-term solution)
2004-08-19 20:14 Testglue patch needed to test recent gcc versions
2004-08-25 13:45 Re: gfortran test runs
2004-08-26 00:34 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation
2004-08-31 00:33 Re: binds_local question
2004-08-31 18:43 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available

Daniel Kegel

2004-08-16 22:47 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler

Daniel Yu

2004-08-31 08:16 Cross_compiler error!HELP ME

Dave Korn

2004-08-04 16:46 RE: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run
2004-08-05 14:46 RE: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults
2004-08-05 16:14 RE: I'm beginner
2004-08-05 16:26 Dead mirror site?
2004-08-05 16:40 RE: I'm beginner
2004-08-09 13:12 RE: Problem with insn-conditions.c
2004-08-09 17:33 RE: problem in extended asm
2004-08-11 09:04 RE: problem in extended asm
2004-08-11 09:31 RE: problem in extended asm
2004-08-11 13:43 RE: problem in extended asm
2004-08-12 11:33 RE: problem in extended asm
2004-08-12 12:47 RE: mips va_arg question
2004-08-12 13:05 RE: mips va_arg question
2004-08-12 13:12 RE: mips va_arg question
2004-08-12 17:48 RE: html problem with http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html
2004-08-13 11:46 RE: problem in extended asm
2004-08-13 11:46 RE: mips va_arg question
2004-08-17 17:04 RE: Broken link and defunct search
2004-08-17 17:26 RE: powerpc64-elf config?
2004-08-17 17:52 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-17 18:09 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 09:46 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 18:05 RE: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-23 13:36 RE: How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu?
2004-08-23 16:21 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-24 18:07 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 18:26 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 11:28 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-26 16:19 RE: GCC Project Help !
2004-08-31 18:30 RE: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR

David Carlton

2004-08-24 20:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:39 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:42 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 22:03 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-30 16:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

David Daney

2004-08-19 17:31 RFT: MIPS libffi patch...

David Edelsohn

2004-08-06 17:57 Dale Johannesen appointed Darwin maintainer
2004-08-09 01:56 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw
2004-08-10 14:23 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target
2004-08-10 14:52 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target
2004-08-11 01:52 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-11 14:47 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target
2004-08-11 22:29 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-14 20:32 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-17 13:58 Re: Generating rtx const
2004-08-17 20:27 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-30 14:23 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-31 14:48 Re: GNU libobjc on Darwin

Denis Chertykov

2004-08-19 17:39 Re: Register classes

Denis Zaitsev

2004-08-07 14:25 BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-08 21:17 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-10 08:05 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-10 08:08 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-10 22:14 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-11 18:45 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-11 18:45 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-11 20:31 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-11 20:32 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-11 20:34 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-12 20:19 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-12 20:23 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work

Devang Patel

2004-08-05 01:00 [RFC] N_BNSYM/N_ENSYM stabs
2004-08-18 19:01 Re: issues with rtl vector operators
2004-08-18 19:11 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 19:17 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 20:36 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 21:35 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 22:52 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 22:53 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-25 21:18 GCC 3.5 and debug info generation
2004-08-26 00:31 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation
2004-08-26 00:42 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation
2004-08-26 21:08 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation
2004-08-31 03:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)

Diego Novillo

2004-08-07 23:52 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug
2004-08-09 21:06 Re: Question on VUSE
2004-08-09 21:17 Re: Question on VUSE
2004-08-10 01:06 Keeping the SSA form up-to-date
2004-08-10 01:17 Re: Optimization question
2004-08-10 13:27 Re: SSA code debugging
2004-08-10 13:59 RE: SSA code debugging
2004-08-10 16:53 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug
2004-08-10 17:16 Re: Another DCE problem with array addresses
2004-08-10 17:35 Re: Ada bootstrap failure due to new DCE bug
2004-08-11 17:56 Re: Your VLA change and Ada
2004-08-12 17:22 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-13 18:46 Re: Converting RTL passes to the tree-pass.h structure
2004-08-13 20:13 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb
2004-08-16 11:58 Re: More Q's regarding gimplification
2004-08-16 12:05 Re: More questions related to gimplification
2004-08-16 12:08 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var
2004-08-16 12:11 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-16 13:51 Re: is_gimple_tmp_var, is_gimple_reg, and is_gimple_reg_type
2004-08-17 12:17 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var
2004-08-17 12:43 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var
2004-08-17 15:49 Pointer arithmetic rules in the tree optimizers?
2004-08-19 21:35 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux
2004-08-19 21:53 New libjava failures
2004-08-20 22:14 Re: TREE_READONLY in lookup_tmp_var
2004-08-23 14:19 Several C++ regressions
2004-08-23 16:43 Re: Several C++ regressions
2004-08-26 17:10 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk tobuild Fortran
2004-08-27 13:26 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables
2004-08-27 14:13 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables
2004-08-30 15:21 Re: [RFC]: Removal of libbanshee and tree-alias-* from mainline
2004-08-30 15:29 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 21:04 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 13:52 Re: automatic casting

DJ Delorie

2004-08-16 17:13 Re: Multi-use register clobbering.

Dorit Naishlos

2004-08-09 21:28 [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-09 21:40 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-17 16:36 initial vectorization functionality now in mainline
2004-08-20 05:29 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-24 20:03 Re: [lno] bootstrap broken
2004-08-25 14:43 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-29 10:01 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-30 10:13 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-30 10:26 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 15:36 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations

Dylan Cuthbert

2004-08-02 09:28 v3sf type and union types to reference elements
2004-08-02 09:53 Re: v3sf type and union types to reference elements
2004-08-03 02:40 Re: v3sf type and union types to reference elements

Eddie Kohler

2004-08-19 22:58 Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-19 23:40 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-20 00:11 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-20 01:56 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?

Edward Peschko

2004-08-08 22:52 error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31
2004-08-12 04:56 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31

Eric Botcazou

2004-08-08 14:21 Re: PATCH for Re: Solaris installation notes
2004-08-12 17:42 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31
2004-08-13 08:35 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31
2004-08-15 13:28 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-31 04:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)

Eric Christopher

2004-08-11 21:43 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)

Falk Hueffner

2004-08-06 00:02 Re: catenation of CPP tokens
2004-08-15 08:15 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 05:30 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer
2004-08-23 14:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 14:37 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 15:46 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:15 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:24 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-25 10:01 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes
2004-08-27 22:49 Re: program compiled with -ftrapv aborts in std::queue<>.size()

Fariborz Jahanian

2004-08-18 16:54 darwin bootstrap failure in mainline

Florian Krohm

2004-08-13 01:00 Re: gcc summit proceedings
2004-08-13 02:45 Re: gcc summit proceedings

Florian Weimer

2004-08-10 22:18 __builtin_string_constant_p
2004-08-11 06:36 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p
2004-08-11 08:24 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p
2004-08-19 09:28 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack
2004-08-19 12:07 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack
2004-08-19 22:57 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-20 00:05 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 14:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:28 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-25 09:55 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.am includes
2004-08-30 10:50 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-30 19:28 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 22:02 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 22:55 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 22:56 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 23:06 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 23:09 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 13:03 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 20:56 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 22:01 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 22:20 Re: Ada policy

Flynn, Lori Arline (Lori)

2004-08-10 13:14 SSA code debugging
2004-08-10 13:44 RE: SSA code debugging

fpga-info

2004-08-11 18:24 Re: Failed (fpga-info@xess.com)

Frank Ch. Eigler

2004-08-26 22:26 mudflap vs. varargs

Frank Ecke

2004-08-14 17:13 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct?

Frauke Lehmann

2004-08-10 12:27 [OT] Survey about FS/OS Developers

Gabor Greif

2004-08-17 23:25 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 00:44 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins

Gabriel Dos Reis

2004-08-02 08:14 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs
2004-08-02 10:17 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs
2004-08-02 10:47 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs
2004-08-02 11:03 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs
2004-08-03 06:25 Re: Fortran question
2004-08-08 08:45 Re: Dependent names in template
2004-08-14 01:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 12:12 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 12:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 15:36 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 15:40 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 16:54 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 17:07 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 19:16 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 21:02 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-23 22:35 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-24 02:55 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi
2004-08-24 19:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 19:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 20:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 20:47 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:42 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:43 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:54 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 22:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 22:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:04 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:31 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:23 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:25 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:30 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:57 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 02:02 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 02:06 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 02:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 03:04 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 03:12 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 01:28 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 01:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 03:07 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 21:37 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 21:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 22:02 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 22:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 22:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-28 16:44 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-28 16:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-28 16:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-29 14:30 Re: Complex log builtins
2004-08-30 03:01 Re: Complex log builtins
2004-08-30 03:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 03:14 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-30 03:20 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-30 03:55 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 04:17 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 04:43 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 10:16 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-31 14:39 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 14:41 Re: Ada policy

Gabriel Paubert

2004-08-11 10:35 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target

Gareth Pearce

2004-08-20 13:30 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?

gccadmin

2004-08-01 17:57 gcc-ss-3.5-20040801 is now available
2004-08-06 23:17 gcc-3.4-20040806 is now available
2004-08-08 17:58 gcc-3.5-20040808 is now available
2004-08-11 23:30 gcc-3.3-20040811 is now available
2004-08-13 23:30 gcc-3.4-20040813 is now available
2004-08-15 18:01 gcc-3.5-20040815 is now available
2004-08-18 23:39 gcc-3.3-20040818 is now available
2004-08-20 23:36 gcc-3.4-20040820 is now available
2004-08-22 17:57 gcc-3.5-20040822 is now available
2004-08-25 23:37 gcc-3.3-20040825 is now available
2004-08-27 23:35 gcc-3.4-20040827 is now available
2004-08-29 18:09 gcc-3.5-20040829 is now available

Geert Bosch

2004-08-01 12:45 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-26 11:02 Re: gfortran test runs

Geoff Keating

2004-08-01 18:24 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-09 19:24 Re: ppc: weird movdi_internal32 interaction with FLOAT_REGS
2004-08-11 18:46 Re: cr logical instruction for powerpc target
2004-08-17 22:21 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-24 21:59 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-30 17:44 proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha
2004-08-31 21:11 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha

Geoffrey Keating

2004-08-01 05:58 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-02 05:20 Re: Implicit built-in function declarations
2004-08-02 05:28 Re: Question about precise definition FLOOR_MOD_EXPR
2004-08-09 21:50 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-12 19:06 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-17 21:26 Re: Dealing with ambiguities in GAS
2004-08-17 21:26 Re: powerpc64-elf config?
2004-08-17 21:26 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-24 21:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-31 21:50 Re: Ada policy

Gerald Pfeifer

2004-08-06 04:41 PATCH for Re: Dead mirror site?
2004-08-06 04:57 Re: gcc debugging
2004-08-06 07:10 PATCH for Re: Solaris installation notes
2004-08-06 07:39 Re: Ready-to-use GNU Tools for Renesas micros
2004-08-06 08:16 Re: [WWWDOCS] Bad links on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html
2004-08-13 19:19 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages?
2004-08-18 11:17 RE: Broken link and defunct search
2004-08-19 21:40 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux
2004-08-25 21:26 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-26 21:21 RE: Broken link and defunct search
2004-08-28 18:15 RE: Broken link and defunct search
2004-08-30 10:45 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing
2004-08-31 08:49 Release criteria (was: Ada policy)

Giovanni Bajo

2004-08-09 04:23 Re: Preprocessing powerpc *.S files?
2004-08-09 23:55 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-09 23:59 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-11 16:07 Re: Explicitly defining a copy-constructor may cost a lot: optimization bug?
2004-08-11 22:20 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-15 19:54 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-16 01:23 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-16 10:31 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-16 11:48 Unconfirmed Ada bugs in Bugzilla
2004-08-26 18:01 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
2004-08-27 10:44 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
2004-08-27 17:06 Re: Bug in implicit conversion (gcc 3.4.1)?
2004-08-30 01:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 10:04 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 11:27 Speeding up C++ at -O0 (Was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29))

Grigory Tolstolytkin

2004-08-26 14:50 gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
2004-08-27 09:18 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())
2004-08-31 16:34 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p())

Gustavo Ribeiro Alves

2004-08-28 05:20 Breaking up loop.c

Gwenole Beauchesne

2004-08-12 11:55 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork
2004-08-12 11:59 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork
2004-08-12 15:06 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork
2004-08-12 21:38 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work

Gyle Yearsley

2004-08-12 23:57 Multi-use register clobbering.
2004-08-16 16:34 RE: Multi-use register clobbering.

H. J. Lu

2004-08-02 20:51 Support COMDAT group
2004-08-03 06:24 Re: Fortran question
2004-08-05 15:19 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw
2004-08-05 20:58 Linker support for -freorder-functions?
2004-08-05 22:38 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions?
2004-08-07 00:02 Is Gcc broken on x86-64?
2004-08-08 19:23 Re: Is Gcc broken on x86-64?
2004-08-09 21:02 PR preprocessor/16950: [3.5 regression]: -Wno-deprecated doesn't work
2004-08-09 21:03 Re: PR preprocessor/16950: [3.5 regression]: -Wno-deprecated doesn't work
2004-08-09 21:44 Re: PR preprocessor/16950: [3.5 regression]: -Wno-deprecated doesn't work
2004-08-16 22:27 Optimize zero extend for EM64T
2004-08-23 21:02 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23)
2004-08-29 22:26 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen
2004-08-30 05:27 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen

Harald Dunkel

2004-08-31 18:39 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available
2004-08-31 21:40 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available

Hickerson, David A

2004-08-06 04:33 gdb question

Hsin-Hsien Wu

2004-08-07 03:55 RTL generation

Ian Lance Taylor

2004-08-04 01:59 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults
2004-08-13 00:06 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C

israel evans

2004-08-21 18:34 failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8

I�aki

2004-08-16 00:48 Question:

Jakub Jelinek

2004-08-05 13:48 *_BY_PIECES_P flaw
2004-08-08 18:33 Re: Is Gcc broken on x86-64?
2004-08-11 08:14 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p
2004-08-14 10:32 Re: fold() and target-specific macros
2004-08-30 11:24 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 18:42 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 06:02 Re: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR

James E Wilson

2004-08-01 22:45 Re: different pointer kinds
2004-08-01 22:51 Re: GCC 3.4.1 error in input.h
2004-08-01 23:07 Re: error in finding a register to spill
2004-08-01 23:29 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler
2004-08-01 23:33 Re: i am working with mmx
2004-08-01 23:41 Re: gcc-3.4.1 build problem
2004-08-01 23:46 Re: gcc-3 on Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.1B (Rev. 2650)
2004-08-03 17:48 Re: how to disable fixincl compiling and call
2004-08-03 18:15 Re: h8300-coff build error with gcc-3.5-20040704
2004-08-03 18:35 Re: error in finding a register to spill
2004-08-04 02:28 Re: Problems with _Unwind_Backtrace() vs signal handlers
2004-08-05 01:31 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run
2004-08-05 01:46 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run
2004-08-05 17:56 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run
2004-08-05 18:11 Re: gcc 3.4.2 branch and gcc 3.5 release schedule
2004-08-05 21:23 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run
2004-08-06 04:23 Re: Unrecognizable insn
2004-08-06 19:26 Re: A question about c-parse.y
2004-08-06 19:56 Re: Missing debug information for decls in empty blocks
2004-08-06 20:54 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw
2004-08-06 21:18 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion?
2004-08-06 21:20 Re: Inline functiion in GCC
2004-08-06 23:18 Re: indirect_operand and memory_operand
2004-08-07 23:47 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-08 00:05 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn'twork
2004-08-08 00:11 Re: build time profiling?
2004-08-08 00:32 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files
2004-08-09 18:08 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files
2004-08-09 18:09 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files
2004-08-09 18:29 Re: Alias attribute vs targets
2004-08-09 18:43 Re: Optimization question
2004-08-10 00:56 issues with rtl vector operators
2004-08-10 01:04 Re: Optimization question
2004-08-10 04:17 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
2004-08-10 19:12 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work
2004-08-10 21:42 Re: *_BY_PIECES_P flaw
2004-08-11 00:21 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work
2004-08-11 00:43 Re: Missing debug information for decls in empty blocks
2004-08-11 18:26 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31
2004-08-11 18:34 Re: Identify destructor/constructor
2004-08-11 19:07 Re: modulus question
2004-08-11 19:32 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work
2004-08-11 22:18 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work
2004-08-12 22:44 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-12 22:46 Re: BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handlingdoesn't work
2004-08-12 23:04 Re: problem in extended asm
2004-08-12 23:20 Re: gcc summit proceedings
2004-08-12 23:26 Re: xscale performance optimization difference between gcc 3.2 and3.4.0
2004-08-12 23:36 Re: GCC Linking Problem
2004-08-12 23:42 Re: bounds checking and traps
2004-08-12 23:45 Re: Request for copyright assignment information
2004-08-13 00:49 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-13 02:08 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-13 02:18 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-13 18:58 RE: problem in extended asm
2004-08-13 19:26 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-14 01:05 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 01:17 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-14 01:27 Re: trouble with fixincl in gcc 3.3 as cross-compiler
2004-08-14 01:36 Re: Multi-use register clobbering.
2004-08-14 03:28 Re: Libobjc and libffi on Darwin
2004-08-15 00:09 Re: How to apply gprof on gcc?
2004-08-16 19:27 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler
2004-08-16 19:48 Re: Profiling
2004-08-16 19:50 Re: Question:
2004-08-16 20:04 Re: Multi-use register clobbering.
2004-08-16 21:29 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-16 23:49 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler
2004-08-16 23:51 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-17 23:20 Re: Question about pattern combining
2004-08-17 23:25 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6 combination)
2004-08-18 00:41 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination)
2004-08-18 20:05 Re: issues with rtl vector operators
2004-08-18 20:58 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 22:26 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations
2004-08-18 23:02 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination)
2004-08-20 01:03 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination)
2004-08-20 01:23 Re: Pointer arithmetic rules in the tree optimizers?
2004-08-20 01:31 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly
2004-08-20 01:53 Re: Register classes
2004-08-20 01:57 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing
2004-08-20 23:18 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly
2004-08-21 00:46 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux
2004-08-21 00:55 Re: Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux
2004-08-21 01:29 Re: PR 15492: floating-point arguments are loaded too early to x87 stack
2004-08-21 01:39 Re: Help: want to build automatic .i-based tester for GCC
2004-08-21 05:12 Re: Problem with ColdFire restricted addressing modes (mode5.6combination)
2004-08-23 20:00 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8
2004-08-23 20:03 Re: How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu?
2004-08-23 21:47 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8
2004-08-25 23:21 Re: number of spills and reloads
2004-08-25 23:43 Re: Inquiry: GCC front-end requirements
2004-08-25 23:47 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin
2004-08-26 00:11 Re: gcc porting
2004-08-31 00:14 Re: number of spills and reloads
2004-08-31 00:28 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin
2004-08-31 01:13 Re: Is this a bug in doloop.c?
2004-08-31 02:59 Re: Mainline space problem
2004-08-31 18:19 Re: Mainline space problem
2004-08-31 18:28 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha
2004-08-31 18:55 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls...
2004-08-31 19:55 Re: Mainline space problem
2004-08-31 20:32 Re: Is this a bug in doloop.c?

Jan Beulich

2004-08-06 13:41 how to submit binary file for inclusion?
2004-08-06 13:55 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion?
2004-08-11 14:19 bounds checking and traps
2004-08-13 06:40 Re: bounds checking and traps
2004-08-13 06:42 Re: bounds checking and traps
2004-08-13 07:16 Re: bounds checking and traps
2004-08-13 08:28 Re: bounds checking and traps
2004-08-13 10:06 Re: bounds checking and traps

Jan Hubicka

2004-08-08 08:43 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions?
2004-08-17 09:05 Re: Optimize zero extend for EM64T
2004-08-30 13:51 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 14:54 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 15:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 15:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)

Janis Johnson

2004-08-04 22:10 mainline regression for vector types in C++
2004-08-04 22:20 Re: mainline regression for vector types in C++
2004-08-17 12:47 Re: Broken link and defunct search
2004-08-17 16:49 mainline bootstrap broken for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
2004-08-17 19:33 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-19 21:32 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-31 16:56 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available

Jason Merrill

2004-08-20 23:49 Re: A #pragma visibility warning from gthr.h
2004-08-20 23:51 PATCH Re: A #pragma visibility warning from gthr.h
2004-08-24 14:04 Re: Several C++ regressions
2004-08-24 19:25 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23)

Jason Thorpe

2004-08-05 14:40 Re: [RFC] ARM Floating point defaults

Jeffrey A Law

2004-08-06 22:40 SSA jump threading/bypassing -- an update
2004-08-09 18:59 Jump threading/bypassing volume 2
2004-08-09 22:36 Re: Jump threading/bypassing volume 3
2004-08-12 05:56 Re: Jump threading/bypassing volume 3.
2004-08-16 06:00 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-17 05:14 Re: Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var
2004-08-17 05:54 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer
2004-08-17 06:02 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useles_stmts_bb
2004-08-17 07:04 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb
2004-08-17 08:45 Re: SPEC regression in perl
2004-08-17 15:05 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb
2004-08-18 06:38 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb
2004-08-21 06:24 Jeff Law -- offline for the next week
2004-08-24 18:24 Re: NOTE_INSN_LOOP_VTOP?
2004-08-30 14:33 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-30 17:01 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 15:10 Re: Mainline space problem

jeroen dobbelaere

2004-08-06 11:39 RE: Inline functiion in GCC

Jie Zhang

2004-08-06 05:40 Re: gdb question
2004-08-16 10:03 Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer
2004-08-18 01:27 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer
2004-08-18 02:10 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer
2004-08-19 01:42 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer
2004-08-20 05:06 Re: Why convert to pointer type before added to a pointer

Jim Kingdon

2004-08-02 06:57 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

jlopes151

2004-08-14 08:15 New to GCC

Joe Buck

2004-08-01 00:12 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-01 00:16 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-01 00:34 Re: LSB naming
2004-08-02 23:17 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-02 23:34 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-03 16:27 Re: Strange Scope effects
2004-08-06 23:02 Re: Inline functiion in GCC
2004-08-10 17:46 Re: Optimization question
2004-08-10 21:25 Re: Optimization question
2004-08-11 19:12 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31
2004-08-11 22:47 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-12 16:54 Re: question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf)
2004-08-12 17:59 Re: error using 3.3.2 in building apache-1.3.31
2004-08-12 23:57 Re: gcc summit proceedings
2004-08-13 01:13 Re: gcc summit proceedings
2004-08-13 21:29 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages?
2004-08-13 23:46 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH
2004-08-17 22:15 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 00:13 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 00:21 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 00:47 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 00:58 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 17:10 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-18 22:00 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-19 17:09 Re: Error in stl?
2004-08-19 23:33 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-20 00:02 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-20 01:11 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-20 16:25 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing
2004-08-24 17:13 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 17:51 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 22:31 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:23 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:25 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:47 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 17:01 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 17:14 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super"
2004-08-25 21:04 issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-25 21:50 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-25 21:56 Re: gfortran test runs
2004-08-25 22:26 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super"
2004-08-25 23:50 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-26 21:08 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-26 22:21 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-26 23:14 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran
2004-08-30 17:08 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 15:55 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available
2004-08-31 23:52 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available

Joern Rennecke

2004-08-02 14:19 Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk with -fPIC (fwd))
2004-08-02 18:35 RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-03 11:37 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk
2004-08-03 12:40 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk
2004-08-04 12:08 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-04 19:50 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-04 19:58 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-05 18:32 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-05 22:18 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-11 11:33 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries
2004-08-15 15:35 divdf3 (Was: Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries)
2004-08-31 18:06 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls...
2004-08-31 18:34 Re: Mainline space problem
2004-08-31 18:59 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files

John David Anglin

2004-08-01 19:12 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
2004-08-21 15:25 Re: [Bug libstdc++/17005] wide character strings don't work on HP-UX 11i using gcc 3.4.1
2004-08-22 19:31 Re: [Bug libstdc++/17005] wide character strings don't work on HP

John Lu

2004-08-25 20:03 Is this a bug in doloop.c?

Jonathan Wakely

2004-08-05 14:20 Dependent names in template
2004-08-06 08:03 Re: Dependent names in template
2004-08-11 08:43 Re: Dependent names in template
2004-08-23 21:38 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi

Jonathan Wilson

2004-08-12 07:35 question about -fPIC and 32-bit x86 (on linux-elf)

Joseph S. Myers

2004-08-01 19:41 Re: gcc-ss-3.5-20040801 is now available
2004-08-01 22:26 Implicit built-in function declarations
2004-08-03 15:19 Re: Implicit built-in function declarations
2004-08-03 19:48 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline
2004-08-04 14:44 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline
2004-08-10 22:56 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p
2004-08-11 00:28 C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-11 22:56 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-11 23:35 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-12 08:32 Re: Defining a HAVE_J0 in config.h for gfortran?
2004-08-14 09:29 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 10:26 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 14:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 14:30 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 14:52 Re: Preprocessor symbols in non-C languages
2004-08-14 15:51 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 16:24 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 16:37 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 16:39 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 18:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-14 19:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-15 10:11 Re: new FAILs on HEAD
2004-08-16 22:01 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2
2004-08-17 21:38 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-17 22:54 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-17 23:26 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-23 11:37 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 13:58 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 14:35 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time fora toplevel "m4" directory?
2004-08-23 15:58 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:27 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:36 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 23:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:27 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:28 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
2004-08-26 12:51 Re: gcc/gcc fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-decl.c ...
2004-08-26 23:52 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings
2004-08-27 16:49 RE: Broken link and defunct search
2004-08-27 22:23 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-30 09:24 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 18:08 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-30 20:57 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 21:24 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-30 21:30 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 22:18 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 22:34 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 00:11 Undefined static functions
2004-08-31 08:31 Re: Undefined static functions
2004-08-31 16:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 20:37 Re: Undefined static functions
2004-08-31 20:44 Re: Ada policy

julien . finet

2004-08-23 10:36 Is it possible to compile for another os?

Justin Palmer

2004-08-31 15:54 Option to compile for both AMD64 and EM64T?

Kai Henningsen

2004-08-13 07:21 Re: O0 cleanup_cfg vs debuggability
2004-08-14 13:56 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages?
2004-08-19 20:59 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-19 20:59 Re: C++ case value question
2004-08-20 15:35 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-20 15:35 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-20 15:35 format cheching (was: Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?)
2004-08-31 21:54 Re: Ada policy

Karel Gardas

2004-08-06 14:20 Re: how to submit binary file for inclusion?
2004-08-12 17:36 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-16 12:34 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2
2004-08-31 09:11 Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30on MICO sources
2004-08-31 09:58 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources
2004-08-31 10:28 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources
2004-08-31 10:55 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources
2004-08-31 13:47 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources

kartick Vaddadi

2004-08-31 12:49 automatic casting

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2004-08-18 01:33 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 14:00 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 17:55 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-23 13:33 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 15:42 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 15:54 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:08 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:30 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:40 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 16:57 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 17:34 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-30 01:53 Re: Complex log builtins
2004-08-30 15:11 Re: Complex log builtins

Kaz Kojima

2004-08-04 00:10 Re: RFC: Handling of libgcc symbols in SH shared libraries

Kelley Cook

2004-08-23 14:17 libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for atoplevel "m4" directory?
2004-08-23 20:52 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory?

Kenneth Zadeck

2004-08-09 20:32 Jump threading/bypassing volume 3
2004-08-10 02:03 Re: Jump threading/bypassing volume 3
2004-08-16 01:08 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway

Kolingba Arthur

2004-08-31 11:00 Need Help

Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

2004-08-04 20:47 Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin 6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain?
2004-08-05 00:25 Re: Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin 6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain?

Lassi A . Tuura

2004-08-03 06:04 Re: Fortran question
2004-08-03 07:58 Re: Fortran question

Laurent GUERBY

2004-08-02 10:32 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs
2004-08-02 10:59 Re: Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs
2004-08-10 20:06 Re: Another DCE problem with array addresses
2004-08-18 18:08 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-30 11:02 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 11:04 Re: Release numbering
2004-08-30 18:02 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 20:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 20:04 Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29))
2004-08-30 21:05 Re: Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29))
2004-08-30 21:49 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 17:55 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 18:42 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 19:02 Re: Ada policy

Laxmi P

2004-08-19 21:31 Multi threaded server : Segementation fault on ia64 Linux

Leehod Baruch

2004-08-17 08:00 Question about pattern combining

Mangal

2004-08-12 14:19 Controlling winding library

Manoj Pillai

2004-08-26 16:05 GCC Project Help !

Marc Espie

2004-08-22 18:59 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?
2004-08-23 17:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists?

Marcel Cox

2004-08-17 18:25 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 10:25 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004

Mark Cuss

2004-08-14 22:15 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler
2004-08-16 20:05 Re: Fw: Can't build gcc 3.3.4 Linux to Sun Cross compiler

Mark Mitchell

2004-08-02 20:17 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunkwith -fPIC (fwd))
2004-08-03 15:47 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk
2004-08-03 16:12 Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk
2004-08-03 18:30 Re: Pending issues wrt integrating objc-improvements-branch withmainline
2004-08-05 23:53 Re: Dependent names in template
2004-08-08 18:03 Re: Dependent names in template
2004-08-10 04:13 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-11 21:00 Re: Identify destructor/constructor
2004-08-11 21:09 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-11 21:12 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-11 21:24 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-11 21:29 Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
2004-08-12 20:59 Where do I mention a branch in our web pages?
2004-08-15 19:36 Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages?
2004-08-16 00:01 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-16 00:06 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-16 00:33 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH
2004-08-16 01:47 GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2
2004-08-16 06:29 Dealing with ambiguities in GAS
2004-08-16 06:45 Re: Dealing with ambiguities in GAS
2004-08-17 17:17 SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-17 18:22 Re: SPEC 2000 results on PowerPC
2004-08-18 02:43 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-18 16:24 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-18 16:25 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-18 17:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-20 06:02 GCC 3.5 project submissions
2004-08-20 07:07 Crashes on PPC VMX tests
2004-08-20 16:49 Re: Crashes on PPC VMX tests
2004-08-23 20:53 GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23)
2004-08-23 21:50 NOTE_INSN_LOOP_VTOP?
2004-08-24 02:25 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi
2004-08-24 02:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 17:43 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 17:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 18:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 18:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:11 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:23 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23)
2004-08-24 21:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:49 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:58 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 22:25 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
2004-08-24 22:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:48 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:29 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 03:07 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 05:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-29 18:07 GCC 3.4 branch frozen
2004-08-29 21:46 GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available
2004-08-29 22:30 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen
2004-08-29 23:17 GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-29 23:52 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 00:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 00:53 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 01:04 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 01:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 03:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 03:32 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 04:11 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 04:33 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 05:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 05:30 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen
2004-08-30 07:06 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 14:26 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 14:48 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 14:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 15:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 15:05 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 04:22 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available
2004-08-31 23:20 Re: Undefined static functions

Mathieu Lacage

2004-08-10 07:38 gcc summit proceedings
2004-08-11 09:12 gcc news #8
2004-08-18 10:55 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 11:19 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-18 13:14 gcc news #9

Mathieu Malaterre

2004-08-27 22:00 gcc -fsingle-precision-constant
2004-08-27 22:41 program compiled with -ftrapv aborts in std::queue<>.size()

Matt Austern

2004-08-04 20:55 Re: Are cctools-528 compatible with apple-gcc 3.3 build 1493/Darwin 6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) toolchain?
2004-08-06 00:02 Re: catenation of CPP tokens
2004-08-10 22:59 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-16 19:25 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2
2004-08-18 17:19 Re: C constant expressions proposals
2004-08-30 02:46 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-31 04:38 Re: Ada policy

Michael Chastain

2004-08-19 21:20 Re: Testglue patch needed to test recent gcc versions
2004-08-26 11:31 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation
2004-08-31 04:05 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available
2004-08-31 04:28 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available

Michael Matz

2004-08-09 07:40 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files
2004-08-12 14:17 Re: Tremendous increase in compile times for 3.4.1 with -mcpu=G5
2004-08-16 07:50 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-16 11:19 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization
2004-08-16 11:25 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-17 15:24 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-19 09:24 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway
2004-08-19 12:56 Re: Register classes
2004-08-28 13:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-28 15:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

Michael N. Moran

2004-08-19 21:17 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins

Michael Ritzert

2004-08-15 01:42 new FAILs on HEAD

Michael Veksler

2004-08-08 06:15 Re: Dependent names in template
2004-08-11 07:41 Re: __builtin_string_constant_p

Mike Stump

2004-08-04 01:19 Re: apple-ppc-branch doesn't bootstrap
2004-08-04 15:16 Re: bootstrap failure powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0
2004-08-05 02:23 Re: [RFC] N_BNSYM/N_ENSYM stabs
2004-08-05 18:10 Re: gcc 3.3.4 cross build for mipsel mischooses the `as' to run
2004-08-05 22:02 Re: Linker support for -freorder-functions?
2004-08-09 16:26 Re: Identifying VAR_DECL node for __FUNCTION__ etc.
2004-08-09 16:29 Re: Output filename currently being compiled
2004-08-10 18:50 Re: "segmentation fault"
2004-08-12 21:33 Re: mips va_arg question
2004-08-17 22:21 Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
2004-08-18 02:04 Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins
2004-08-21 18:58 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8
2004-08-23 20:02 Re: GCC Organization
2004-08-23 23:58 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 17:34 Re: gcc porting
2004-08-24 19:28 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 19:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 19:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 20:35 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:18 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 21:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 22:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 22:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:00 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:09 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-24 23:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 00:52 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 01:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 01:40 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 02:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 02:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-25 23:41 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin
2004-08-26 00:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 02:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-27 17:36 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings
2004-08-28 14:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-28 14:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
2004-08-28 14:33 Re: Any recommendation for an expert on RTL?
2004-08-30 17:46 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
2004-08-30 22:38 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-30 22:43 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 00:13 binds_local question
2004-08-31 01:57 Re: binds_local question
2004-08-31 02:37 Re: Ada policy
2004-08-31 19:18 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources
2004-08-31 21:03 Re: Libgfortran licensing
2004-08-31 22:50 Re: Libgfortran licensing

Mile Davidovic

2004-08-12 11:01 mips va_arg question
2004-08-12 12:55 Re: mips va_arg question
2004-08-12 13:02 RE: mips va_arg question
2004-08-12 13:14 Re: mips va_arg question

mitchell

2004-08-09 18:45 GCC Status (2004-08-09)

Morten Welinder

2004-08-20 17:30 -Wdefault-bitfield-sign

Mostafa Hagog

2004-08-17 19:37 cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly
2004-08-20 14:52 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly
2004-08-22 07:40 Re: cfg_layout_split_edge doesn't handle the general case correctly
2004-08-22 19:03 Re: GCC 3.5 project submissions

Nathan Myers

2004-08-01 00:05 Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

Nathan Sidwell

2004-08-02 13:59 Re: gcc-question
2004-08-03 16:27 Re: Strange Scope effects
2004-08-06 11:40 Re: Inline functiion in GCC
2004-08-07 13:32 Re: C++ query
2004-08-14 17:02 Re: -fprofile-generate
2004-08-16 08:20 Re: GCC 3.5 Plan, Take 2
2004-08-18 08:37 Re: C++ case value question
2004-08-18 08:42 Re: Question on build_int_cst
2004-08-18 12:11 Re: Question on build_int_cst
2004-08-18 13:43 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types.
2004-08-19 08:17 Re: [gfortran] Fix NULL reference types.
2004-08-20 08:03 Re: C++ case value question
2004-08-20 09:13 Re: New libjava failures
2004-08-20 14:21 Re: Crashes on PPC VMX tests
2004-08-23 19:47 [RFC] Have assert macros
2004-08-25 08:10 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros
2004-08-26 09:04 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super"

Nathanael Nerode

2004-08-13 17:19 Converting RTL passes to the tree-pass.h structure
2004-08-13 18:57 Ada build failure?
2004-08-14 01:03 Re: Question on GIMPLE semantics and EH (with possible easy long-term solution)
2004-08-14 01:50 [PATCH] Fix is_gimple_tmp_var
2004-08-16 07:56 Q's about use of is_gimple_reg_rhs/is_gimple_tmp_var
2004-08-16 10:25 More questions related to gimplification
2004-08-16 11:27 More Q's regarding gimplification
2004-08-16 13:41 is_gimple_tmp_var, is_gimple_reg, and is_gimple_reg_type

gcc archiveauthor index for August, 2004

gcc archive
author index for August, 2004