gcc archive
date index for August, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2004
23:58 Re: IA64 floating point division question Steve Ellcey
23:55 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Andrew Pinski
23:52 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Joe Buck
23:45 Re: IA64 floating point division question Zack Weinberg
23:20 Re: Undefined static functions Mark Mitchell
23:15 TREE_READONLY on SAVE_EXPR Richard Kenner
22:50 Re: Libgfortran licensing Mike Stump
22:46 IA64 floating point division question Steve Ellcey
22:20 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:19 Re: Libgfortran licensing Tobias Schlüter
22:19 Re: Libgfortran licensing Toon Moene
22:16 Re: Libgfortran licensing Robert Dewar
22:14 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:11 Re: Libgfortran licensing Paul Brook
22:11 Re: Libgfortran licensing Robert Dewar
22:06 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:02 Re: Libgfortran licensing Toon Moene
22:01 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
21:54 Re: Ada policy Kai Henningsen
21:50 Re: Ada policy Geoffrey Keating
21:40 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Harald Dunkel
21:11 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Geoff Keating
21:04 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
21:03 Re: Libgfortran licensing Mike Stump
20:56 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
20:56 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Steve Ellcey
20:53 Re: Compile-time and execution-time impact of CSE - some numbers Paolo Bonzini
20:44 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
20:37 Re: Undefined static functions Joseph S. Myers
20:34 Re: Ada policy Scott Robert Ladd
20:33 Re: Undefined static functions Richard Henderson
20:32 Re: Is this a bug in doloop.c? James E Wilson
20:26 Re: Mainline space problem Daniel Berlin
20:21 Libgfortran licensing Tobias Schlüter
20:11 Re: Mainline space problem Robert Dewar
20:05 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
20:04 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Richard Henderson
19:55 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
19:36 Re: Ada policy Scott Robert Ladd
19:30 Re: automatic casting Tom Tromey
19:28 question on class layout with virtual base classes Yan Liu
19:27 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
19:18 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Mike Stump
19:02 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
18:59 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Joern Rennecke
18:55 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... James E Wilson
18:53 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:45 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:44 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:43 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Daniel Jacobowitz
18:42 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
18:40 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Richard Kenner
18:39 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Harald Dunkel
18:37 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:37 Re: Mainline space problem Daniel Berlin
18:34 Re: Mainline space problem Joern Rennecke
18:33 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Richard Sandiford
18:30 RE: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Dave Korn
18:28 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha James E Wilson
18:19 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
18:10 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
18:06 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Joern Rennecke
17:57 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Steve Ellcey
17:55 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
17:35 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
16:56 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Janis Johnson
16:34 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Grigory Tolstolytkin
16:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joseph S. Myers
15:55 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Joe Buck
15:54 Option to compile for both AMD64 and EM64T? Justin Palmer
15:36 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
15:27 Re: Cross_compiler error!HELP ME Dan Kegel
15:10 Re: Mainline space problem Jeffrey A Law
15:02 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
14:48 Re: GNU libobjc on Darwin David Edelsohn
14:41 Re: Ada policy Gabriel Dos Reis
14:39 Re: Ada policy Gabriel Dos Reis
13:57 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Zdenek Dvorak
13:52 Re: automatic casting Diego Novillo
13:50 Re: Compile-time and execution-time impact of CSE - some numbers Steven Bosscher
13:47 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
13:29 Compile-time and execution-time impact of CSE - some numbers Paolo Bonzini
13:22 On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Steven Bosscher
13:10 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
13:08 Re: Release criteria Robert Dewar
13:06 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
13:03 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
13:01 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
12:55 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
12:53 Re: automatic casting Paolo Bonzini
12:49 automatic casting kartick Vaddadi
12:48 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
11:24 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
11:00 Need Help Kolingba Arthur
10:55 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
10:49 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
10:46 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30on MICO sources Paolo Bonzini
10:44 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
10:34 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
10:28 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
10:24 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Paolo Bonzini
10:12 Funnies about C++ parsing - unhelpful error messages Richard Guenther
09:58 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
09:42 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Arnaud Charlet
09:41 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
09:11 Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30on MICO sources Karel Gardas
09:00 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Arnaud Charlet
08:49 Release criteria (was: Ada policy) Gerald Pfeifer
08:31 Re: Undefined static functions Joseph S. Myers
08:25 Re: Cross_compiler error!HELP ME Zack Weinberg
08:16 Cross_compiler error!HELP ME Daniel Yu
07:38 Re: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Alan Modra
06:02 Re: segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Jakub Jelinek
05:27 Re: Ada policy Per Bothner
05:04 Re: binds_local question Richard Henderson
05:01 Re: Undefined static functions Richard Henderson
04:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Eric Botcazou
04:51 GNU libobjc on Darwin Bill Northcott
04:38 Re: Ada policy Matt Austern
04:28 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Michael Chastain
04:22 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Mark Mitchell
04:07 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
04:05 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Michael Chastain
04:05 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:56 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:41 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
03:34 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
03:31 Re: Mainline space problem Daniel Berlin
03:29 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
03:28 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
03:25 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
03:22 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:17 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
03:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Devang Patel
03:00 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
02:59 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
02:54 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
02:50 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
02:37 Re: Ada policy Mike Stump
02:10 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
01:57 Re: binds_local question Mike Stump
01:25 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
01:13 Re: Is this a bug in doloop.c? James E Wilson
01:13 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
01:06 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
00:48 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
00:33 Re: binds_local question Daniel Jacobowitz
00:28 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin James E Wilson
00:14 Re: number of spills and reloads James E Wilson
00:13 binds_local question Mike Stump
00:11 Undefined static functions Joseph S. Myers

August 30, 2004
23:09 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
23:06 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
23:01 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Andrew Pinski
23:00 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
23:00 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
22:56 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:55 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:52 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:52 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:48 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:43 Re: Ada policy Mike Stump
22:38 Re: Ada policy Mike Stump
22:34 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
22:31 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:30 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:28 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:25 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
22:18 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
22:02 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
22:01 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
21:53 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
21:49 Re: Ada policy Laurent GUERBY
21:41 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
21:30 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
21:24 Re: Release numbering Joseph S. Myers
21:18 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
21:05 Re: Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Laurent GUERBY
21:04 Re: Ada policy Diego Novillo
21:02 Re: Release numbering [--enable-mapped-location] Per Bothner
20:57 Re: Ada policy Joseph S. Myers
20:57 Re: Ada policy Richard Henderson
20:55 Re: Release numbering Zack Weinberg
20:53 Re: Minimal FDE Richard Henderson
20:47 Re: Release numbering Per Bothner
20:46 Re: Ada policy Richard Guenther
20:34 Re: Ada policy Zack Weinberg
20:25 Re: Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Richard Kenner
20:14 Re: Release numbering Phil Edwards
20:04 Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Laurent GUERBY
20:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Laurent GUERBY
19:28 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Florian Weimer
18:42 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jakub Jelinek
18:38 Minimal FDE Yaakov Yaari
18:28 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
18:08 Re: Release numbering Joseph S. Myers
18:02 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Richard Henderson
18:02 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Laurent GUERBY
17:46 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mike Stump
17:44 proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Geoff Keating
17:08 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joe Buck
17:01 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jeffrey A Law
16:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
15:29 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Diego Novillo
15:21 Re: [RFC]: Removal of libbanshee and tree-alias-* from mainline Diego Novillo
15:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
15:11 Re: Complex log builtins Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
15:05 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
15:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:54 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
14:48 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:42 Re: Release numbering Steven Bosscher
14:33 Re: Release numbering Jeffrey A Law
14:26 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: Release numbering David Edelsohn
14:16 Re: Complex log builtins Paul Brook
13:51 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jan Hubicka
13:05 Re: Release numbering Robert Dewar
12:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
11:27 Speeding up C++ at -O0 (Was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Giovanni Bajo
11:24 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Jakub Jelinek
11:04 Re: Release numbering Laurent GUERBY
11:02 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Laurent GUERBY
10:50 Re: Release numbering Florian Weimer
10:45 Re: 2004 Summit Proceedings missing Gerald Pfeifer
10:44 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Paolo Bonzini
10:26 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Dorit Naishlos
10:22 Re: Release numbering Steven Bosscher
10:19 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Richard Kenner
10:17 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
10:16 Re: Release numbering Gabriel Dos Reis
10:13 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
10:11 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Richard Kenner
10:11 Re: [RFC] Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak
10:04 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Giovanni Bajo
10:03 Re: Release numbering Richard Kenner
09:24 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joseph S. Myers
08:15 Re: Release numbering Phil Edwards
07:34 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
07:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
07:06 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
06:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
05:30 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
05:27 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen H. J. Lu
05:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
04:43 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:33 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
04:17 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:11 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
04:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Nathanael Nerode
03:55 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:32 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
03:20 Re: Release numbering Gabriel Dos Reis
03:14 Re: Release numbering Gabriel Dos Reis
03:10 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:09 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
03:03 Mainline space problem Bradley Lucier
03:01 Re: Complex log builtins Gabriel Dos Reis
02:46 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Matt Austern
02:41 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
02:34 segfaults in MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT and MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Alan Modra
01:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Giovanni Bajo
01:53 Re: Complex log builtins Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:51 [RFC]: Removal of libbanshee and tree-alias-* from mainline Daniel Berlin
01:29 Re: Release numbering Phil Edwards
01:12 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
01:09 Release numbering Richard Kenner
01:04 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
00:59 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Andrew Pinski
00:57 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
00:53 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
00:48 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Richard Kenner
00:33 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
00:25 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Daniel Berlin
00:03 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell

August 29, 2004
23:52 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
23:49 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Steven Bosscher
23:40 Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Andrew Pinski
23:21 Re: text for AT&T style 386 asm syntax as used by GCC Randy.Dunlap
23:17 GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Mark Mitchell
22:30 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
22:26 Re: GCC 3.4 branch frozen H. J. Lu
21:46 GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Mark Mitchell
19:47 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
18:09 gcc-3.5-20040829 is now available gccadmin
18:07 GCC 3.4 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
16:51 Query on Pentium-M performance Robert Dewar
15:47 Lettre-message de b.ecologie@free.fr b dot ecologie at free dot fr
14:30 Re: Complex log builtins Gabriel Dos Reis
12:07 text for AT&T style 386 asm syntax as used by GCC Robert Dewar
11:14 Complex log builtins Paul Brook
10:01 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos

August 28, 2004
18:15 RE: Broken link and defunct search Gerald Pfeifer
17:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andreas Schwab
16:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:44 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:04 s390 bootstrap broken on mainline Andreas Jaeger
15:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Michael Matz
15:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andreas Schwab
14:33 Re: Any recommendation for an expert on RTL? Mike Stump
14:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
14:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
13:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Michael Matz
09:05 Re: Breaking up loop.c Steven Bosscher
05:20 Breaking up loop.c Gustavo Ribeiro Alves
03:01 volunteering to maintain the FR-V port Alexandre Oliva

August 27, 2004
23:54 Re: gcc -fsingle-precision-constant Phil Edwards
23:35 gcc-3.4-20040827 is now available gccadmin
22:49 Re: program compiled with -ftrapv aborts in std::queue<>.size() Falk Hueffner
22:49 Any recommendation for an expert on RTL? Chunhua Liao
22:41 program compiled with -ftrapv aborts in std::queue<>.size() Mathieu Malaterre
22:23 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joseph S. Myers
22:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:13 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
22:02 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:00 gcc -fsingle-precision-constant Mathieu Malaterre
21:59 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
21:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:50 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
21:39 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Steven L. Zook
21:37 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:26 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ D. Starner
19:10 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Phil Edwards
17:36 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Mike Stump
17:06 Re: Bug in implicit conversion (gcc 3.4.1)? Giovanni Bajo
16:49 RE: Broken link and defunct search Joseph S. Myers
16:41 Facilite sua vida ou Empresa Carolina
15:06 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Richard Earnshaw
14:52 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Paolo Bonzini
14:18 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Andrew MacLeod
14:13 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Diego Novillo
13:59 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Richard Kenner
13:26 Re: Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Diego Novillo
12:30 Tree dumps and (garbage?) local variables Richard Guenther
11:58 Ada build status Richard Kenner
10:44 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Giovanni Bajo
09:52 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk tobuild Fortran Richard Earnshaw
09:18 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Grigory Tolstolytkin
08:57 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Segher Boessenkool
08:45 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Andreas Schwab
05:46 Re: compiles under g++ but not gcc sol
05:18 Re: compiles under g++ but not gcc Zack Weinberg
04:47 compiles under g++ but not gcc sol
03:56 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Roland Dreier
03:07 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
01:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:28 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis

August 26, 2004
23:52 Re: varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Joseph S. Myers
23:46 varargs, 64-bit targets, and strict-aliasing warnings Roland Dreier
23:14 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
23:03 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
22:26 mudflap vs. varargs Frank Ch. Eigler
22:21 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
21:47 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
21:42 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Clif Smith
21:39 Re: Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Phil Edwards
21:34 WANTED OKUMA LU-15 Paul Arbour
21:34 WANTED OKUMA LU-15 Paul Arbour
21:21 RE: Broken link and defunct search Gerald Pfeifer
21:08 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
21:08 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
21:04 Can't compile gcc-3.3.2 - /home/mitchell... Permission denied Clif Smith
19:01 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Richard Sandiford
18:03 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Henderson
18:01 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Giovanni Bajo
17:34 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Paul Brook
17:31 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
17:10 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk tobuild Fortran Diego Novillo
17:06 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
16:19 RE: GCC Project Help ! Dave Korn
16:05 GCC Project Help ! Manoj Pillai
15:03 Re: gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Paul Brook
14:50 gcc 3.3.1 segmentation fault (in rtlanal.c, rtx_varies_p()) Grigory Tolstolytkin
14:03 Bug in implicit conversion (gcc 3.4.1)? Boris von Loesch
13:17 Re: gcc/gcc fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-decl.c ... Tobias Schlüter
12:51 Re: gcc/gcc fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-decl.c ... Joseph S. Myers
11:31 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Michael Chastain
11:02 Re: gfortran test runs Geert Bosch
09:58 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Earnshaw
09:29 Re: number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start Zdenek Dvorak
09:04 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Nathan Sidwell
08:46 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin Tal Agmon
07:03 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Richard E Collins
05:45 Re: number of spills and reloads Qiong Cai
03:41 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Daniel Berlin
03:37 Re: number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start Daniel Berlin
03:37 Re: Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Daniel Berlin
03:33 Not pulling out obvious non-aliasing global from the loop Andrew Pinski
03:23 number_of_iterations_in_loop and a non-constant loop bound start Andrew Pinski
00:42 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
00:34 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Daniel Jacobowitz
00:31 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
00:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
00:13 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
00:11 Re: gcc porting James E Wilson

August 25, 2004
23:50 Re: [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
23:47 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin James E Wilson
23:45 [semi-related patch] Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Phil Edwards
23:43 Re: Inquiry: GCC front-end requirements James E Wilson
23:41 Re: Canadian cross on cygwin Mike Stump
23:37 gcc-3.3-20040825 is now available gccadmin
23:21 Re: number of spills and reloads James E Wilson
22:45 Re: GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Steven Bosscher
22:26 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Joe Buck
22:09 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Phil Edwards
21:56 Re: gfortran test runs Joe Buck
21:50 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
21:30 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Andrew Pinski
21:26 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Gerald Pfeifer
21:24 Re: gfortran test runs Toon Moene
21:18 GCC 3.5 and debug info generation Devang Patel
21:08 Re: issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Andrew Pinski
21:04 issues with configuring the trunk to build Fortran Joe Buck
20:03 Is this a bug in doloop.c? John Lu
18:44 Re: [lno] bootstrap broken Sebastian Pop
18:22 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
18:14 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Richard E Collins
17:38 Re: gfortran test runs Scott Robert Ladd
17:14 Re: Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Joe Buck
17:01 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
16:12 Canadian cross on cygwin Tal Agmon
15:53 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Earnshaw
15:49 Re: gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
15:38 Re: gfortran test runs Richard Earnshaw
14:43 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Dorit Naishlos
14:00 Re: gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
13:51 Re: gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
13:45 Re: gfortran test runs Daniel Jacobowitz
13:07 gfortran test runs Andrew MacLeod
12:22 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
12:01 Microsoft Specific C++ keyword "__super" Richard E Collins
11:28 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Dave Korn
10:42 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
10:36 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
10:16 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
10:13 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
10:10 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
10:07 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
10:01 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Falk Hueffner
09:55 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.am includes Florian Weimer
09:54 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Andrew Haley
09:46 Re: [Valgrind-developers] Memcheck optimisation level; Makefile.amincludes Nicholas Nethercote
09:05 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Nicholas Nethercote
08:10 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Nathan Sidwell
05:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
05:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andrew Pinski
05:06 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
03:12 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
03:07 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
03:04 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:50 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
02:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
02:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:06 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
02:02 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:40 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
01:16 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
00:57 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:52 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
00:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Henderson
00:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
00:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
00:30 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:29 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
00:28 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Joseph S. Myers
00:25 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:23 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:21 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Henderson
00:18 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Phil Edwards

August 24, 2004
23:48 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
23:47 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
23:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
23:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Henderson
23:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
23:31 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
23:27 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joseph S. Myers
23:25 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
23:23 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
23:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
23:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
23:09 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Dale Johannesen
23:09 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
23:08 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Zack Weinberg
23:04 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Zack Weinberg
23:04 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
23:00 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
22:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
22:49 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Toon Moene
22:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
22:40 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Dale Johannesen
22:31 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Paul Brook
22:31 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
22:25 Re: [RFC] Have assert macros Mark Mitchell
22:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
22:19 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:10 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
22:03 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
22:00 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
21:59 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Geoff Keating
21:58 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
21:54 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:51 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
21:49 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
21:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:46 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
21:45 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
21:43 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:42 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
21:42 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:39 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
21:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Geoffrey Keating
21:23 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) Mark Mitchell
21:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
21:18 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
21:11 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
20:57 Re: i386: unrecognized insn - "andhi3" pattern Richard Henderson
20:55 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Richard Henderson
20:47 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:35 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
20:22 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ David Carlton
20:14 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:03 Re: [lno] bootstrap broken Dorit Naishlos
19:56 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
19:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:34 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:32 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
19:28 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
19:25 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) Jason Merrill
18:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
18:26 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Dave Korn
18:24 Re: NOTE_INSN_LOOP_VTOP? Jeffrey A Law
18:20 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
18:13 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time fora toplevel "m4" directory? Nathanael Nerode
18:07 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for atoplevel "m4" directory? Nathanael Nerode
18:07 RE: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Dave Korn
17:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
17:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
17:55 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Richard Earnshaw
17:51 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
17:43 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
17:36 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
17:34 Re: gcc porting Mike Stump
17:13 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joe Buck
17:03 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
15:17 Inquiry: GCC front-end requirements Slawomir Lisznianski
14:04 Re: Several C++ regressions Jason Merrill
13:56 i386: unrecognized insn - "andhi3" pattern Uros Bizjak
10:27 [lno] bootstrap broken Volker Reichelt
08:46 gcc porting Soha Eyal-RM50194
06:53 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Zack Weinberg
06:34 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time fora toplevel "m4" directory? Paolo Bonzini
05:06 Computer training CD's QuickClick Computer Training
04:40 make protoize broken with your changes Andreas Jaeger
02:55 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
02:33 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mark Mitchell
02:25 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi Mark Mitchell
01:01 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Zack Weinberg

August 23, 2004
23:58 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Mike Stump
23:53 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Joseph S. Myers
23:48 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Aldy Hernandez
23:38 Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Andrew Pinski
23:28 Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++ Roger Sayle
23:15 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
22:49 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
22:47 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Clifford Wolf
22:35 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:29 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Andreas Schwab
22:21 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Clifford Wolf
21:54 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
21:50 NOTE_INSN_LOOP_VTOP? Mark Mitchell
21:47 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 James E Wilson
21:38 Re: [doc] Fix illegal example code in trouble.texi Jonathan Wakely
21:02 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) H. J. Lu
20:53 GCC 3.4.2 Status (2004-08-23) Mark Mitchell
20:52 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Kelley Cook
20:10 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 Andreas Tobler
20:03 Re: How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu? James E Wilson
20:02 Re: GCC Organization Mike Stump
20:00 Re: failed to build gcc 3.4.1 on macosx 10.2.8 James E Wilson
19:47 [RFC] Have assert macros Nathan Sidwell
19:00 Re: GVN-PRE sucks -- well, for SPECCFP2000 mgrid anyway Andrew MacLeod
18:27 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
18:18 GCC Organization Wagner Luis Nardini
17:34 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:13 Re: Several C++ regressions Zack Weinberg
17:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Marc Espie
16:57 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:43 Re: Several C++ regressions Diego Novillo
16:40 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:39 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
16:36 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
16:31 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Segher Boessenkool
16:30 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:28 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Florian Weimer
16:27 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
16:25 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Andreas Schwab
16:24 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
16:23 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Andreas Schwab
16:21 RE: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Dave Korn
16:15 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
16:08 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:06 Re: Several C++ regressions Phil Edwards
16:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Paul Koning
15:58 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
15:54 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:46 number of spills and reloads Qiong Cai
15:46 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
15:44 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for a toplevel "m4" directory? Zack Weinberg
15:42 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:26 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak
14:58 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
14:50 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Segher Boessenkool
14:37 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
14:35 Re: libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time fora toplevel "m4" directory? Joseph S. Myers
14:29 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Segher Boessenkool
14:21 Re: Several C++ regressions Andrew Pinski
14:19 Several C++ regressions Diego Novillo
14:17 libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for atoplevel "m4" directory? Kelley Cook
14:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Falk Hueffner
14:04 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Florian Weimer
13:58 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
13:36 RE: How to test ARM pre-built toolchains with dejagnu? Dave Korn
13:33 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:37 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Joseph S. Myers
10:55 Is it possible to compile for another os? Andrew Haley
10:36 Is it possible to compile for another os? julien . finet
10:32 Re: Warning for unadorned 0 in varargs lists? Paolo Bonzini
07:32 Re: [RFC] Variable Expansion Optimization Revital Eres
07:11 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Zdenek Dvorak

August 22, 2004
23:59 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Zack Weinberg
22:41 Re: Variable Expansion Optimization Ayal Zaks
21:45 Re: [PATCH] for Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Richard Henderson
20:44 Re: [PATCH] for Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial test case Richard Kenner
20:35 [PATCH] for Re: Bug in loop invariant motion with trivial