This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| >> Given these developments, I think the FSG might want to re-think some of
| >> their previous assumptions. If this means delaying the C++ bits of LSB
| >> 2.0, then I think that is a step that should be honestly considered.
| >> It's far better to have no specification than a flawed one.
| >Maybe that's the recommendation we (the GCC developers) should make
| >to FSG/LSB. Delay the C++ bits until we can reach some kind of
| >agreement on what the right bits for the standard ought to be.
|
| Sounds good to me.
I did not read Jeff's message before suggesting the same :-)
-- Gaby