Re: 25% memory requirement regression since yesterday

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

Richard Guenther wrote:

> The tramp3d tracker caught a memory requirement regression for C++ on
> mainline inbetween (excluding)
>
> 2004-07-11  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
>
>        * cp-tree.h (saved_scope): Make old_bindings a vector.
>        (unuse_fields): Remove.
>        * name-lookup.h (cxx_saved_binding): Define it.
>        * class.c (pushclass): Don't use unuse_fields.
>        * name-lookup.c (cxx_saved_binding_make): Remove.
>        (store_binding): Add new bindings to a vector, using an
>        accumulator style, rather than adding them to a list.
>        (store_bindings): Adjust accordingly.
>        (store_class_bindings): Likewise.
>        (push_to_top_level): Likewise.
>        [...]
>
> also compile-time regressed somewhat.  Have a look at
> http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/gcc/monitor-summary.html
> for both detailled graphs and the testcase.
>  
I'll look into that.  Do you have data about compile-times, or just 
about memory usage?

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com