re:re:gcc test results question

["David P. Riedel" <driedel at cox dot net>]

let me rephrase my question then.

the test results referenced by the url are from running 'make check' on the 
new gcc 3.4.1 compiler.  the results for the AMD chip show many more 
'unexpected failures' than test results for the Intel chips.

so, given these test results from 'make check', if i have a choice between 
running gcc 3.4.1 on an AMD computer and on an Intel computer, should i 
choose the Intel machine?

thanks

dave riedel

phil edwards wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:08:26PM -0400, David P. Riedel wrote:
> > the test results posted at:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-07/msg00070.html
> > 
> > show a large number (63) of unexpected failures.  is this still considered 
a 
> > 'good' compiler suitable for building production code?  i see a similar 
> > number of unexpected failures for the athlon-mp on my system.
> 
> Depends on what those tests are testing, and when they started failing.
> 
>