This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Memory requirement regressions

From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:20:24 +0200
Subject: Re: Memory requirement regressions
References: <40EC1B35.80900@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de><200407071931.25834.stevenb@suse.de><40EC3645.3090504@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de><200407072129.58715.stevenb@suse.de>

* Steven Bosscher:

> So, memory use appears to have gone up, but I can't reproduce the
> dramatic increases you're seeing.

How much of these effects can be explained just by changed GC
defaults?  Using lots of address space (even RAM) is not bad per se if
enough of it is available. 8-)

References:
- Memory requirement regressions
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Memory requirement regressions
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Memory requirement regressions
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Memory requirement regressions
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]