This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ada & JGNAT

The problem is that JBC being a valid output for Ada might cause rms to push against having a JBC front-end in GCC. 

I can't imagine why? If you are worried about GNAT itself, then
why would this be a concern, since GNAT is FS.

If you are worried that it is a proof of concept, then

a) Another company Intermetrics has done a similar product
b) JGNAT exists as a proof of concept whether or not it is at FSF

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]