This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ada & JGNAT

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 17:22:44 +0200
Subject: Re: Ada & JGNAT
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.devel
References: <1088805125.8635.26.camel@pc.site> <40EB38AF.4040506@specifixinc.com> <20040707104450.1f0aa36b@buddha.localdomain.de> <40EBEF57.4060108@gnat.com>

I think the confusion is that the concern is with taking java byte code as input, whereas the discussion in the context of JGNAT is about generating JBC as output.

The problem is that JBC being a valid output for Ada might cause rms to push against having a JBC front-end in GCC.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ada & JGNAT
  - From: Robert Dewar

References:
- Ada & JGNAT
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: Ada & JGNAT
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Ada & JGNAT
  - From: Matthias Benkmann
- Re: Ada & JGNAT
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]