This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: aggregate_value_p in the gimplifier

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:51:27 -0700
Subject: Re: aggregate_value_p in the gimplifier
References: <200407051645.23200.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <40EB5ED4.9030004@specifixinc.com> <20040707031114.GA32086@redhat.com> <200407070939.33130.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:43:15AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> So the test is not problematic from the pure C compiler's viewpoint?

I don't see why it is problematic.


r~

References:
- aggregate_value_p in the gimplifier
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: aggregate_value_p in the gimplifier
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: aggregate_value_p in the gimplifier
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: aggregate_value_p in the gimplifier
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]