Eric Botcazou wrote:
This doesn't make sense because the member function in question reads:
inline long double&
complex<long double>::real()
{ return __real__ _M_value; } // line 1296
And _M_value does have type __complex__ long double. Should I start a
binary search, or is this known to be some kind of recent breakage?
Could be Mark's latest patch to the parser.
AFAICT, yes - I was able to proceed with the bootstrap once
I reverted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg02268.html
(on i686-pc-linux-gnu)